[11:57] <athos> good morning :)
[12:05] <ahasenack> morning athos
[12:06] <athos> ahasenack: \o
[13:51] <coreycb> jamespage: yes, I'm working on that now (jaraco.context)
[14:20] <ahasenack> sergiodj: any idea why debian's samba decided to do this?
[14:20] <ahasenack> `    point [printers] to /var/tmp/, stop shipping /var/spool/samba
[14:20] <ahasenack> `
[14:20] <ahasenack> there is no reasonin in the commit message
[14:21] <ahasenack> and I haven't seen this brought up in the mailing list discussions started by the new maintainer
[14:33] <coreycb> jamespage: done
[14:33] <jamespage> ta
[17:29] <athos> I am proposing to drop all the nss delta based on the comments in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss/+bug/1971299; Since there will be no MP for that, it would be nice to get another pair of eyes there before we proceed with the sync :)
[17:32] <ahasenack> athos: you can still file an MP with all dropped
[17:33] <ahasenack> "Remaining changes" in the changelog will be empty, and the rest will be the "Dropped" lines
[17:33] <ahasenack> but it's good for analysis
[17:33] <sergiodj> agreed :)
[17:33] <sergiodj> I like to do that for complex merges, too
[17:35] <sergiodj> ahasenack: let me take a look at the samba change you've mentioned above
[17:35] <ahasenack> it's just one of many many many
[17:36] <sergiodj> ugh
[17:36] <sergiodj> I'd suggest getting in touch with the new maintainer, then
[17:36] <ahasenack> yep
[17:36] <sergiodj> assuming you can't find anything in the changelog/salsa
[17:37] <sergiodj> I see he's done *a lot* of uploads in April/May
[17:40] <ahasenack> we went ahead of debian in terms of upstream source 3x in jammy
[17:41] <ahasenack> 4.13.5 was the last source we shared with debian
[17:41] <ahasenack> then we went to 4.13.14 (security), 4.13.17 (security), and finally 4.15.5 (non-security)
[17:42] <ahasenack> sounds like the security team applied the MRE idea there
[17:42] <sergiodj> I glanced over the changes done these last months (superficially), and some of them seem a bit...  experimental
[17:42] <ahasenack> agreed
[17:42] <ahasenack> at least the rate of changes slowed down
[17:43] <ahasenack> last one I saw in the mailing list was an attempt to do another build to run tests I think
[17:43] <ahasenack> which required enabling some compile-time options not suitable for production, hence the separate build
[17:43] <ahasenack> iirc
[17:43] <sergiodj> hm
[17:44] <sergiodj> well, on the one hand we're talking about a non-LTS release here, so I think we have some leeway to bring in more experimental changes.  OTOH, I don't know if I'm entirely comfortable with everything the new maintainer has been doing
[17:45] <ahasenack> this means watching over this package in this cycle will demand a lot more time
[17:45] <ahasenack> and testing, experimentation
[17:45] <sergiodj> yes
[17:46] <sergiodj> we could keep the divergence with Debian during this cycle while we wait and see if things will settle down on their side
[17:46] <sergiodj> I'd be +1 with that
[17:46] <sergiodj> (especially because I know how busy you are with other stuff)
[17:47] <ahasenack> I'll give it a try this week still I think
[17:47] <ahasenack> one day and a half remaining
[17:47] <sergiodj> +1