| === not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy | ||
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| seb128 | slyon, thanks for the MIR review! it does feel a bit weird to see update-maintainer called out in those reviews though, it doesn't feel like something that should make a difference in support level even if it's standard practice, but if that's something the MIR team care about maybe it should be mentioned on the wiki checklist? | 09:57 |
|---|---|---|
| slyon | seb128: Yes. I don't see that as a blocker, but only mentioned it as a common packaging practice, so it can be fixed "whenever the next upload happens". But indeed, we might want to add that to the wiki checklist. I will prepare a proposal about that | 10:00 |
| seb128 | slyon, thanks, I wonder if we could have dpkg-buildpackage call it for us or something to avoid even having to talk about those changes :) | 10:01 |
| slyon | seb128: IIRC foundations (jawn-smith) did some work on this a few months ago, I'm not sure which packages we landed this checks in... let me check if I find some references. But sbuild fails for me locally, if `update-maintainer` wasn't run | 10:03 |
| slyon | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1951988 | 10:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1951988 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "dpkg-source should fail if maintainer is not ubuntu and DEBEMAIL contains @canonical.com" [Low, Fix Released] | 10:04 |
| slyon | So that should already be in place IMO | 10:08 |
| seb128 | slyon, I've a DEBEMAIL set with a @debian.org which bypass that check basically :p | 10:09 |
| seb128 | I usually do the update-maintainer thing only when really diverging from Debian | 10:10 |
| slyon | ah! that's why it didn't catch it for you. | 10:10 |
| seb128 | not when cherry picking changes from the Debian vcs or when including delta I intend to see merged in the next upload | 10:10 |
| seb128 | but maybe I should try to be more consistent and think about doing the update-maintainer anyway | 10:11 |
| slyon | okay. I'm not sure if we have any formal policy written down about this anywhere. This is probably the closest we can get: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField and it's not really specific about the "expected to be merged" changes special case | 10:14 |
| slyon | I always try to apply that rule as: whenever we diverge in any way, update the maintainer field. But you're probably more senior than me to make a call about that. It's a recommended TODO in the MIR anyway, so feel free to ignore it | 10:15 |
| seb128 | slyon, right, thanks. And for the record I'm probably the one being wrong there, I've just been lazy about adding one manual step to my package updates | 10:20 |
| seb128 | I will do the update-maintainer of I do another upload, but if things go according to plan we will rather sync and have no delta ;) | 10:20 |
| slyon | yes, that sounds like a good plan. a sync will solve the issue for good, without any additional upload needed. Thanks! | 10:21 |
| slyon | FTR: https://github.com/cpaelzer/ubuntu-mir/pull/10 | 10:31 |
| ubottu | Pull 10 in cpaelzer/ubuntu-mir "mention update of d/control when a Ubuntu delta was introduced" [Open] | 10:31 |
| cpaelzer | slyon: did you check if the base content of the repo was still up to date? | 10:51 |
| cpaelzer | I haven't synced back in a while since the wiki didn't let me edit for weeks | 10:52 |
| cpaelzer | it is fine to discuss the change, but we can't copy&paste all of it to update eventually | 10:52 |
| slyon | cpaelzer: nope. I didn't | 10:52 |
| slyon | so maybe we can discuss the change in today's meeting and I can copy the two sections into the wiki manually | 10:53 |
| cpaelzer | yep that would be my plan as well | 10:53 |
| slyon | ok | 10:53 |
| slyon | well.. I can't login to the wiki neither. let's see if we have somebody during today's meeting who is still logged in. otherwise I guess we can't deploy that change to the wiki for now | 10:58 |
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| seb128 | hum, annoying, webkitgtk started to build-depends on ccache which isn't in the i386 whitelist but build-depends on other things that aren't available either :/ | 12:27 |
| seb128 | jbicha, ^ fyi | 12:27 |
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
| jawn-smith | bdmurray, enr0n: thanks for getting u-r-u uploaded | 15:09 |
| Guest8108 | Hello, is there any documentation on how the current Ubuntu 22.04 LTS installer image is built? | 16:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!