[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backintime (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3 => 1.2.1-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [02:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [05:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:51] hello, is auto-sync dead? [06:52] or launchpad fails to look for new packages in sid... [07:12] locutusofborg, hey, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/ [07:12] seb128, this is why I put the second sentence [07:12] locutusofborg, was there a specific package you are considering? [07:13] libsdl2/llvm-toolchain-13, 14 and 12 [07:14] locutusofborg, https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/llvm-toolchain-13 so yes, sounds like worth asking on #launchpad [07:14] locutusofborg, speaking about libsdl2 did you see my ping from yesterday? [07:19] yes [07:19] this is why I want to sync :) [07:20] locutusofborg, I still didn't see a report of why or how that test is failing in Ubuntu, on what basis do we skip? [07:20] locutusofborg, I think that's also what Simon was asking on the report, to get specific and try to resolve the problem rather than skip over it without explanation [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.48.3 => 2.55.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.3 => 2.55.5+20.04] (core) [07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.2 => 2.55.5+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (impish-proposed/main) [2.54.3+21.10.1ubuntu0.3 => 2.55.5+21.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [07:26] seb128, it was a new test, so probably it failed since the begin? [07:26] locutusofborg, still, if it assert it would be nice to have a stacktrace of the error [07:27] or at least get a report with the details of how it's not working [07:27] also to back-up the claim that it needs really hardware [07:27] I think we did the same for ~5 packages already on arm64? [07:27] I remember that xvb-run failing on arm64 since forever... [07:28] so we did it wrong once and now we use it as a justification to keep doing it wrong? :p [07:28] (I remember probably some xcb haskell tool) [07:28] seb128, that one, indeed! [07:28] but maybe its just because the analysis was done long time ago and I don't remember where [07:28] anyway, Simon would probably help us to figure out the issue if we reported the actual error with details [07:29] do you think you can do that? [07:29] or if you are not interrested I put that on my backlog [07:32] bbl [07:47] locutusofborg, k, I'm back, so are you interested to get the debug info or should I give it a try instead? [08:06] seb128, I fix llvm-14 and come back to this :) [08:08] locutusofborg, thx [08:23] DPI: failed to query (That operation is not supported) [08:23] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/600059998/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-arm64.libsdl2_2.0.22+dfsg-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz [08:23] sorry but I don't see any kind of crash [08:24] its just failing to query the dummy device? [08:25] oh... got it [08:26] I know why I did ignore it, I read the wrong failure (again) [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (jammy-proposed/main) [0.99.22.1 => 0.99.22.2] (core) [10:06] seb128, it doesn't segfault on my pbuilder kinetic arm64 environment (on top of qemu and amd64 host) [10:06] so, I'm out of ideas [10:06] INFO: Readers read 4000000 total events [10:06] testatomic: OK [10:12] locutusofborg, I didn't mean to imply that it should be segfaulting, just that we should do a report of the failure to launchpad/debian/upstream with details in case someone want to consider fixing the issue rather than ignoring it as we did [10:17] seb128, I mean, I cant generate a coredump locally to open an issue [10:18] locutusofborg, how do you trigger the test? just build doing a build? let me try on a porter box [10:18] yes I did a full build :) [10:18] iwth version 3ubuntu1 [10:18] *with [10:19] (the build won't fail, because of the || true [10:19] but you can see in log [10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xlnx-firmware (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [0.1ubuntu18 => 2022.1-1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [10:50] locutusofborg, do we expect clang to be installable on i386? [10:50] I wonder if https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/espeak-ng/kinetic/i386 should be ignored now [10:51] The following packages will be REMOVED: [10:51] binutils build-essential dpkg-dev g++ g++-11 gcc gcc-11 [10:52] Debian added a new test that depends on clang, https://salsa.debian.org/a11y-team/espeak-ng/-/commit/b9b3f94cf [10:52] Commit b9b3f94 in a11y-team/espeak-ng "tests/: Add fuzzing test" [10:53] it is installable, just not together with g++... [10:53] locutusofborg, right, I'm asking if we should skip that test now or wait for clang to be fixed [10:53] but honestly I don't care about it being installable [10:53] so we should probably skip espeak-ng/i386 [10:54] yes, as long as reverse-dependencies for llvm-toolchain-14 on i386 still build :) [10:54] seb128, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/603541418/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-i386.ffmpeg_7%3A4.4.2-1ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz [10:54] for some reasons, clang is installable on i386 [11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset) [11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset) [11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset) [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-log [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.1-2] (no packageset) [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset) [11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed guile-2.2 from i386-whitelist in kinetic [11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libfreeaptx to i386-whitelist in kinetic [11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added sphinx-copybutton to i386-whitelist in kinetic [11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.5 => 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset) [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset) [12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset) [12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset) [12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset) [12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset) [12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (impish-proposed/main) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4 => 2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xlnx-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022.1-1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] [13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset) [13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset) [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (jammy-proposed/main) [3.44.1-0ubuntu2 => 3.44.2-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) === mfo_ is now known as mfo [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.2-0ubuntu1.2 => 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.3] (core, i386-whitelist) [15:01] vorlon, hey, do you have any opinion on adding ccache to the i386 whitelist? (it's a new build-depends from webkitgtk in Debian, which is in sync for Ubuntu atm) [15:02] seb128: ccache seems like it should be an easy enough thing to add, it shouldn't have tentacly build-depends of its own [15:02] the only thing I've said 'no' to recently was adding the qt5 stack to the whitelist [15:03] locutusofborg: temporarily removing biosig 2.4.0-1 from -proposed to let us rebuild for the octave transition [15:05] vorlon, it adds hiredis which adds redis which adds lua-bitop-dev and liblzf-dev and I stopped poking there to ask ... do we have an helper to tell us what adding one package would bring? [15:05] seb128: hmm ISTR redis hasn't built on i386 for a very long time.... [15:05] but no, no helpers for this [15:07] locutusofborg: ah; however, I already *had* done a no-change rebuild of biosig 2.3.3-1 for the new octave, and it had ftbfs in kinetic: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biosig/2.3.3-1build3 [15:08] locutusofborg: so my next step is to revert the temporary removal from -proposed, but remove biosig and sigviewer from kinetic release [15:09] vorlon, which I guess build ccache on i386 isn't going to be that easy :/ [15:11] seb128: if it requires redis, then no. [15:12] :-( [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (focal-proposed/main) [1.445.1 => 1.445.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (jammy-proposed/main) [1.470 => 1.470.1] (desktop-core) [15:33] thanks vorlon [15:33] vorlon, adabrowse please kick out? its out from testing and blocks gnat migration [15:33] ∙ ∙ Updating adabrowse would introduce bugs in testing: #1008980 [15:34] once I get the bzr server to answer me, yes [15:34] :) thanks! [15:35] and for ocaml migration we are waiting some decision about z3 mir right? [15:35] I didn't realize someone had proposed a z3 MIR [15:35] I would like to let ocaml migrate and re-evaluate it [15:35] I think that's absurd and we should not promote z3 [15:35] vorlon, read backlog, its suggested by some ruby-* I don't remember [15:35] cargo was pulling in llvm-dev [15:36] I thought we were going to correct that [15:36] in any case, if we move llvm-13-dev to universe, we let ocaml migrate, then we can try to promote once the z3 mir is closed? [15:37] also, LP: #1975898 if possible :) [15:37] Launchpad bug 1975898 in ntp (Ubuntu) "RM: ntp from kinetic?" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1975898 [15:37] fwiw I also have a fix here for the biosig 2.3 FTBFS, it's small, I think I might just upload it too [15:40] btw you pinged me about biosig, but I don't think I had uploaded it, didn't I? [15:41] oh yes I did :D [15:50] ntp: now that ntpsec is in, this should just be process-removals [15:50] yep, done [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: biosig (kinetic-proposed/primary) [2.3.3-1ubuntu1] [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.3-1ubuntu1] [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: kalendar (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.04.1-1] [16:57] locutusofborg: rustc has just migrated to kinetic release with llvm-13 dropped to suggests; this should unblock things without any ill-conceived MIR for z3? [16:57] ftr there is no MIR bug open for z3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/z3 [17:49] vorlon: there is bug 1971128 though [17:49] Bug 1971128 in rustc (Ubuntu Jammy) "z3 is incorrectly marked as a MIR candidate" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971128 [17:49] bdmurray: seems like that can be closed [17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oxygen-sounds (kinetic-proposed/primary) [4:5.24.90-1] [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-omegaconf [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0~rc1-3] (no packageset) [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-faq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [11.1] (no packageset) [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-omegaconf [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0~rc1-3] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-faq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [11.1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-log [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] [21:40] vorlon, shouldn't we know move libllvm-13-dev to universe? [22:14] locutusofborg: per https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html, yes [22:14] (done) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk-vnc [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu1] [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] [23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sphinx-reredirects [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) [23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-castellan [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.0-0ubuntu1.1] [23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.log [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.6.1-0ubuntu1.1]