[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backintime (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3 => 1.2.1-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[01:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[02:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:51] <locutusofborg> hello, is auto-sync dead?
[06:52] <locutusofborg> or launchpad fails to look for new packages in sid...
[07:12] <seb128> locutusofborg, hey, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/
[07:12] <locutusofborg> seb128, this is why I put the second sentence
[07:12] <seb128> locutusofborg, was there a specific package you are considering?
[07:13] <locutusofborg> libsdl2/llvm-toolchain-13, 14 and 12
[07:14] <seb128> locutusofborg, https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/llvm-toolchain-13 so yes, sounds like worth asking on #launchpad
[07:14] <seb128> locutusofborg, speaking about libsdl2 did you see my ping from yesterday?
[07:19] <locutusofborg> yes
[07:19] <locutusofborg> this is why I want to sync :)
[07:20] <seb128> locutusofborg, I still didn't see a report of why or how that test is failing in Ubuntu, on what basis do we skip?
[07:20] <seb128> locutusofborg, I think that's also what Simon was asking on the report, to get specific and try to resolve the problem rather than skip over it without explanation
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.48.3 => 2.55.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.3 => 2.55.5+20.04] (core)
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.2 => 2.55.5+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (impish-proposed/main) [2.54.3+21.10.1ubuntu0.3 => 2.55.5+21.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[07:26] <locutusofborg> seb128, it was a new test, so probably it failed since the begin?
[07:26] <seb128> locutusofborg, still, if it assert it would be nice to have a stacktrace of the error
[07:27] <seb128> or at least get a report with the details of how it's not working
[07:27] <seb128> also to back-up the claim that it needs really hardware
[07:27] <locutusofborg> I think we did the same for ~5 packages already on arm64?
[07:27] <locutusofborg> I remember that xvb-run failing on arm64 since forever...
[07:28] <seb128> so we did it wrong once and now we use it as a justification to keep doing it wrong? :p
[07:28] <locutusofborg> (I remember probably some xcb haskell tool)
[07:28] <locutusofborg> seb128, that one, indeed!
[07:28] <locutusofborg> but maybe its just because the analysis was done long time ago and I don't remember where
[07:28] <seb128> anyway, Simon would probably help us to figure out the issue if we reported the actual error with details
[07:29] <seb128> do you think you can do that?
[07:29] <seb128> or if you are not interrested I put that on my backlog
[07:32] <seb128> bbl
[07:47] <seb128> locutusofborg, k, I'm back, so are you interested to get the debug info or should I give it a try instead?
[08:06] <locutusofborg> seb128, I fix llvm-14 and come back to this :)
[08:08] <seb128> locutusofborg, thx
[08:23] <locutusofborg> DPI: failed to query (That operation is not supported)
[08:23] <locutusofborg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/600059998/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-arm64.libsdl2_2.0.22+dfsg-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[08:23] <locutusofborg> sorry but I don't see any kind of crash
[08:24] <locutusofborg> its just failing to query the dummy device?
[08:25] <locutusofborg> oh... got it
[08:26] <locutusofborg> I know why I did ignore it, I read the wrong failure (again)
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (jammy-proposed/main) [0.99.22.1 => 0.99.22.2] (core)
[10:06] <locutusofborg> seb128, it doesn't segfault on my pbuilder kinetic arm64 environment (on top of qemu and amd64 host)
[10:06] <locutusofborg> so, I'm out of ideas
[10:06] <locutusofborg> INFO: Readers read 4000000 total events
[10:06] <locutusofborg> testatomic: OK
[10:12] <seb128> locutusofborg, I didn't mean to imply that it should be segfaulting, just that we should do a report of the failure to launchpad/debian/upstream with details in case someone want to consider fixing the issue rather than ignoring it as we did
[10:17] <locutusofborg> seb128, I mean, I cant generate a coredump locally to open an issue
[10:18] <seb128> locutusofborg, how do you trigger the test? just build doing a build? let me try on a porter box
[10:18] <locutusofborg> yes I did a full build :)
[10:18] <locutusofborg> iwth version 3ubuntu1
[10:18] <locutusofborg> *with
[10:19] <locutusofborg> (the build won't fail, because of the || true
[10:19] <locutusofborg> but you can see in log
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xlnx-firmware (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [0.1ubuntu18 => 2022.1-1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:50] <seb128> locutusofborg, do we expect clang to be installable on i386?
[10:50] <seb128> I wonder if https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/espeak-ng/kinetic/i386 should be ignored now
[10:51] <locutusofborg> The following packages will be REMOVED:
[10:51] <locutusofborg>   binutils build-essential dpkg-dev g++ g++-11 gcc gcc-11
[10:52] <seb128> Debian added a new test that depends on clang, https://salsa.debian.org/a11y-team/espeak-ng/-/commit/b9b3f94cf
[10:53] <locutusofborg> it is installable, just not together with g++...
[10:53] <seb128> locutusofborg, right, I'm asking if we should skip that test now or wait for clang to be fixed
[10:53] <locutusofborg> but honestly I don't care about it being installable
[10:53] <seb128> so we should probably skip espeak-ng/i386
[10:54] <locutusofborg> yes, as long as reverse-dependencies for llvm-toolchain-14 on i386 still build :)
[10:54] <locutusofborg> seb128, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/603541418/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-i386.ffmpeg_7%3A4.4.2-1ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz
[10:54] <locutusofborg> for some reasons, clang is installable on i386
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-log [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset)
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed guile-2.2 from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libfreeaptx to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added sphinx-copybutton to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.5 => 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apbs [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-serde [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.136-1] (no packageset)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (impish-proposed/main) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4 => 2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xlnx-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022.1-1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rcppml [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.7-2] (no packageset)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (jammy-proposed/main) [3.44.1-0ubuntu2 => 3.44.2-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.2-0ubuntu1.2 => 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:01] <seb128> vorlon, hey, do you have any opinion on adding ccache to the i386 whitelist? (it's a new build-depends from webkitgtk in Debian, which is in sync for Ubuntu atm)
[15:02] <vorlon> seb128: ccache seems like it should be an easy enough thing to add, it shouldn't have tentacly build-depends of its own
[15:02] <vorlon> the only thing I've said 'no' to recently was adding the qt5 stack to the whitelist
[15:03] <vorlon> locutusofborg: temporarily removing biosig 2.4.0-1 from -proposed to let us rebuild for the octave transition
[15:05] <seb128> vorlon, it adds hiredis which adds redis which adds lua-bitop-dev and liblzf-dev and I stopped poking there to ask ... do we have an helper to tell us what adding one package would bring?
[15:05] <vorlon> seb128: hmm ISTR redis hasn't built on i386 for a very long time....
[15:05] <vorlon> but no, no helpers for this
[15:07] <vorlon> locutusofborg: ah; however, I already *had* done a no-change rebuild of biosig 2.3.3-1 for the new octave, and it had ftbfs in kinetic: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biosig/2.3.3-1build3
[15:08] <vorlon> locutusofborg: so my next step is to revert the temporary removal from -proposed, but remove biosig and sigviewer from kinetic release
[15:09] <seb128> vorlon, which I guess build ccache on i386 isn't going to be that easy :/
[15:11] <vorlon> seb128: if it requires redis, then no.
[15:12] <seb128> :-(
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (focal-proposed/main) [1.445.1 => 1.445.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (jammy-proposed/main) [1.470 => 1.470.1] (desktop-core)
[15:33] <locutusofborg> thanks vorlon
[15:33] <locutusofborg> vorlon, adabrowse please kick out? its out from testing and blocks gnat migration
[15:33] <locutusofborg> ∙ ∙ Updating adabrowse would introduce bugs in testing: #1008980
[15:34] <vorlon> once I get the bzr server to answer me, yes
[15:34] <locutusofborg> :) thanks!
[15:35] <locutusofborg> and for ocaml migration we are waiting some decision about z3 mir right?
[15:35] <vorlon> I didn't realize someone had proposed a z3 MIR
[15:35] <locutusofborg> I would like to let ocaml migrate and re-evaluate it
[15:35] <vorlon> I think that's absurd and we should not promote z3
[15:35] <locutusofborg> vorlon, read backlog, its suggested by some ruby-* I don't remember
[15:35] <vorlon> cargo was pulling in llvm-dev
[15:36] <vorlon> I thought we were going to correct that
[15:36] <locutusofborg> in any case, if we move llvm-13-dev to universe, we let ocaml migrate, then we can try to promote once the z3 mir is closed?
[15:37] <locutusofborg> also, LP: #1975898 if possible :)
[15:37] <vorlon> fwiw I also have a fix here for the biosig 2.3 FTBFS, it's small, I think I might just upload it too
[15:40] <locutusofborg> btw you pinged me about biosig, but I don't think I had uploaded it, didn't I?
[15:41] <locutusofborg> oh yes I did :D
[15:50] <vorlon> ntp: now that ntpsec is in, this should just be process-removals
[15:50] <vorlon> yep, done
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: biosig (kinetic-proposed/primary) [2.3.3-1ubuntu1]
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted biosig [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.3-1ubuntu1]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: kalendar (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.04.1-1]
[16:57] <vorlon> locutusofborg: rustc has just migrated to kinetic release with llvm-13 dropped to suggests; this should unblock things without any ill-conceived MIR for z3?
[16:57] <vorlon> ftr there is no MIR bug open for z3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/z3
[17:49] <bdmurray> vorlon: there is bug 1971128 though
[17:49] <vorlon> bdmurray: seems like that can be closed
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oxygen-sounds (kinetic-proposed/primary) [4:5.24.90-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-omegaconf [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0~rc1-3] (no packageset)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-faq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [11.1] (no packageset)
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-omegaconf [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0~rc1-3]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-faq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [11.1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-log [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apbs [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.4.1-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rcppml [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.7-2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-serde [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.136-1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mir [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:40] <locutusofborg> vorlon, shouldn't we know move libllvm-13-dev to universe?
[22:14] <vorlon> locutusofborg: per https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html, yes
[22:14] <vorlon> (done)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk-vnc [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu1]
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sphinx-reredirects [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-castellan [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.10.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.log [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.6.1-0ubuntu1.1]