[00:04] u-d-a@ moderation please [00:07] can do [00:31] Thanks! [08:07] locutusofborg: am I wrong in thinking that your recent force-sync of llvm-toolchain-13 dropped the LP: #1973041 patch? [08:07] Launchpad bug 1973041 in llvm-toolchain-13 (Ubuntu Kinetic) "llvm-toolchain-13: please backport Risc-V .insn directive support" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1973041 [08:09] lvoytek: have you submitted the combined swtpm apparmor changes to upstream already? [08:09] I just came by the pkg and there are quite a few things that need to go to upstream and/or debian before we can merge/sync it [08:10] this is one of the [08:10] m [08:44] vorlon: FYI as you see above I've asked lvoytek today to have a look at upstreaming the swtpm apparmor content [08:45] vorlon: but there is much more and now that upstream AND debian have diverging packaging I think it would be time to align a bit more with each other [08:46] I have started to take a look, probably autopkgtest to debian (https://salsa.debian.org/paelzer-guest/swtpm/-/tree/ubuntu-to-debian-draft) [08:46] and also apparmor (as mentioned above) and the tss user change to Upstream? https://salsa.debian.org/paelzer-guest/swtpm/-/commits/ubuntu-to-upstream-draft [08:47] but while it was great to have an initial overview, I realized this is too much of a rabbit hole to pick up "along the way" [08:47] I've also seen that https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/pull/620 kind of straved to death [08:47] Pull 620 in stefanberger/swtpm "Openssl not certtool" [Closed] [08:47] vorlon: So I wanted to ask is there anyone in foundations with some dedicated time this cycle to merge and reduce delta? [10:22] schopin, yes you are? [10:22] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/604400563/llvm-toolchain-13_1%3A13.0.1-4ubuntu1_1%3A13.0.1-5.diff.gz [10:22] look at the diff [10:22] why do you say that? [10:32] no mention of it in the Debian changelog entry [10:33] locutusofborg: ^ [10:34] Thanks for checking, it was on my TODO for today but I thought I'd ask first :) [10:34] llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium [10:34] * Backport D115098 for Rust 1.59 (Closes: #1010150) [10:34] -- Sylvestre Ledru Mon, 09 May 2022 20:47:26 +0200 [10:34] it is mentioned here [10:34] correct? [10:35] No, it's not the same patch. That one is about a regression in some merge function thingy, whereas the one I'm worried about is for some risc asm instruction. [10:35] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010150 [10:35] Debian bug 1010150 in src:llvm-toolchain-13 "llvm-toolchain-13: please backport upstream D115098 for rust" [Normal, Open] [10:38] schopin, ok, I missed the fact that the issues were separate, so I didn't mention in changelog [10:38] but the patch is here yes [10:38] I would SRU to jammy the whole release [11:48] sil2100: hey, do you mind having a look why pinging the ISO tracker failed? https://github.com/ubuntu/WSL/runs/6687638976 [12:48] didrocks: looking! [12:49] didrocks: uh, looks like the tracker is down [12:52] didrocks: ok, yeah, so the tracker machine is being moved today, so the tracker is unavailable. Should be good once it's back up [13:16] sil2100: ack, at least, expected. Thanks for checking out! === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g [15:09] cpaelzer: "is there someone on Foundations" - sorta seems like you should make me do it :) [16:20] didrocks: The iso tracker should be back now, let me know if you have any issues with it [16:22] bdmurray: thanks! I’ll let run tomorrow’s daily build in this case as it didn’t prevent the WSL upload to be made on Microsoft Store === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand