[00:04] <rbasak> u-d-a@ moderation please
[00:07] <bdmurray> can do
[00:31] <rbasak> Thanks!
[08:07] <schopin> locutusofborg: am I wrong in thinking that your recent force-sync of llvm-toolchain-13 dropped the LP: #1973041 patch?
[08:09] <cpaelzer> lvoytek: have you submitted the combined swtpm apparmor changes to upstream already?
[08:09] <cpaelzer> I just came by the pkg and there are quite a few things that need to go to upstream and/or debian before we can merge/sync it
[08:10] <cpaelzer> this is one of the
[08:10] <cpaelzer> m
[08:44] <cpaelzer> vorlon: FYI as you see above I've asked lvoytek today to have a look at upstreaming the swtpm apparmor content
[08:45] <cpaelzer> vorlon: but there is much more and now that upstream AND debian have diverging packaging I think it would be time to align a bit more with each other
[08:46] <cpaelzer> I have started to take a look, probably autopkgtest to debian (https://salsa.debian.org/paelzer-guest/swtpm/-/tree/ubuntu-to-debian-draft)
[08:46] <cpaelzer> and also apparmor (as mentioned above) and the tss user change to Upstream? https://salsa.debian.org/paelzer-guest/swtpm/-/commits/ubuntu-to-upstream-draft
[08:47] <cpaelzer> but while it was great to have an initial overview, I realized this is too much of a rabbit hole to pick up "along the way"
[08:47] <cpaelzer> I've also seen that https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/pull/620 kind of straved to death
[08:47] <cpaelzer> vorlon: So I wanted to ask is there anyone in foundations with some dedicated time this cycle to merge and reduce delta?
[10:22] <locutusofborg> schopin, yes you are?
[10:22] <locutusofborg> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/604400563/llvm-toolchain-13_1%3A13.0.1-4ubuntu1_1%3A13.0.1-5.diff.gz
[10:22] <locutusofborg> look at the diff
[10:22] <locutusofborg> why do you say that?
[10:32] <schopin> no mention of it in the Debian changelog entry
[10:33] <schopin> locutusofborg: ^
[10:34] <schopin> Thanks for checking, it was on my TODO for today but I thought I'd ask first :)
[10:34] <locutusofborg> llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
[10:34] <locutusofborg>   * Backport D115098 for Rust 1.59 (Closes: #1010150)
[10:34] <locutusofborg>  -- Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>  Mon, 09 May 2022 20:47:26 +0200
[10:34] <locutusofborg> it is mentioned here
[10:34] <locutusofborg> correct?
[10:35] <schopin> No, it's not the same patch. That one is about a regression in some merge function thingy, whereas the one I'm worried about is for some risc asm instruction.
[10:35] <locutusofborg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010150
[10:38] <locutusofborg> schopin, ok, I missed the fact that the issues were separate, so I didn't mention in changelog
[10:38] <locutusofborg> but the patch is here yes
[10:38] <locutusofborg> I would SRU to jammy the whole release
[11:48] <didrocks> sil2100: hey, do you mind having a look why pinging the ISO tracker failed? https://github.com/ubuntu/WSL/runs/6687638976
[12:48] <sil2100> didrocks: looking!
[12:49] <sil2100> didrocks: uh, looks like the tracker is down
[12:52] <sil2100> didrocks: ok, yeah, so the tracker machine is being moved today, so the tracker is unavailable. Should be good once it's back up
[13:16] <didrocks> sil2100: ack, at least, expected. Thanks for checking out!
[15:09] <vorlon> cpaelzer: "is there someone on Foundations" - sorta seems like you should make me do it :)
[16:20] <bdmurray> didrocks: The iso tracker should be back now, let me know if you have any issues with it
[16:22] <didrocks> bdmurray: thanks! I’ll let run tomorrow’s daily build in this case as it didn’t prevent the WSL upload to be made on Microsoft Store