[00:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:42.2-0ubuntu1]
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.9]
[01:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sphinx-reredirects [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0+dfsg1-1]
[02:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.22]
[09:28] <sil2100> rbasak: hey! I'll look into reviewing the snapd SRUs today, if anything, as those are needed for the UC22 release we're working on right now
[09:28] <sil2100> So just a heads-up
[09:40] <xnox> vorlon:  i hope we don't need qt on i386. i thought in the past something rather wanted it, like cmake? and then it spiralled into a massive chain of deps. Unless this has been resolved and we have gui-less cmake now.
[09:40] <xnox> on i386
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.13 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.14] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.55.5+22.04]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (impish-proposed) [2.55.5+21.10]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.55.5+20.04]
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.55.5+18.04]
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texlive-bin [i386] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.20220321.62855-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texlive-bin [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.20220321.62855-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:32] <rbasak> sil2100: thank you for checking in! There was no conflict - I've had various interrupts this morning :-/
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texlive-bin [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.20220321.62855-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texlive-bin [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.20220321.62855-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:42] <seb128> sil2100, hey, anything we can do to move bug #1965901 forward? we have seen no report of regression from the staging period
[11:42] <ubottu> Bug 1965901 in modemmanager (Ubuntu) "SRU the new 1.18 serie to focal for hwe" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1965901
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texlive-bin [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.20220321.62855-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:44] <sil2100> seb128: hey! Ah, yeah, wanted to consult this with someone first, because essentially this will regress users with locked radios (...but regress it with good intentions and 'needed')
[11:44] <sil2100> Let me think about it tomorrow during my SRU shift
[11:45] <seb128> sil2100, ok, oem team pinged me again about it. I agree with you on the regression, on the other side we need to consider the argument that the vendors are going to regress users anyway through firmware update and we need to address that problem also
[11:45] <seb128> I mean that's one of the reason for the update
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cups [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.1-9ubuntu1.2]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2.11]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsdl2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1]
[12:06] <locutusofborg> please consider accepting virtualbox too ??
[12:08] <rbasak> Sorry I don't have very much time on my shift today. I'm just running through the quick and easy ones.
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texlive-bin [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [2022.20220321.62855-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lvm2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.03.07-1ubuntu1.1]
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.21.2-1~bpo22.04.1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2022.05.18-1~bpo22.04.1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.22.0-1~bpo22.04.1]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gallery-dl [source] (focal-backports) [1.21.2-1~bpo20.04.1]
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.99.22.2]
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (focal-backports) [1.22.0-1~bpo20.04.1]
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencpn [source] (focal-backports) [5.6.2+dfsg-1~bpo20.04.1]
[13:41] <locutusofborg> seb128, I honestly don't understand the libsdl2 block proposed tag... is it something I should care?
[13:41] <locutusofborg> I did the testing and its good now
[13:46] <seb128> locutusofborg, ? there is no tag, it's waiting for autopkgtest results according to excuses
[13:47] <seb128> locutusofborg, if you are talking about the SRU bug #1976198 you need to ask rbasak since I don't understand his point
[13:47] <ubottu> Bug 1976198 in libsdl2 (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Possible missing dependencies of libsdl2-dev in Jammy" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1976198
[13:48] <seb128> > I wonder though if we can stage it to bundle it with an update that directly impacts users
[13:48] <seb128> I would say that missing depends on a -dev impact users since it gives you a non working lib unless you figure out you need to install extra binaries the deb isn't pulling for you
[13:49] <seb128> I'm going to write that on the bug
[13:50] <locutusofborg> yes wrong ping sorry
[13:50] <seb128> np
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted texlive-bin [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.20220321.62855-3]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted texlive-bin [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.20220321.62855-3]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted texlive-bin [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.20220321.62855-3]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted texlive-bin [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.20220321.62855-3]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted texlive-bin [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.20220321.62855-3]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted texlive-bin [i386] (kinetic-proposed) [2022.20220321.62855-3]
[14:56] <rbasak> locutusofborg: I suppose it just depends on assessment of priority. A workaround being available without eg. needing a new patched binary built makes it lower priority. Requiring all users, most of whom are unaffected, to download extra updates isn't good for them. Bundling together with an essential security update would be ideal. So it's just a case of the trade-off between all of those.
[14:58] <rbasak> If the use case is only building from an upstream git branch tip, then there's also the possibility of temporarily workaround around from that end.
[14:58] <rbasak> Otherwise we end up with users downloading gigs of updates every few days for relatively trivial issues, and that's also suboptimal.
[15:18] <rbasak> seb128: you missed my comment if you care: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/06/01/%23ubuntu-release.html#t14:56
[15:35] <RikMills> ubuntu-archive: please accept oxygens-sounds from Debian. needed for the full new plasma source stack
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk4 (jammy-proposed/main) [4.6.3+ds1-0ubuntu1 => 4.6.5+ds-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:16] <vorlon> RikMills: why are you manually syncing a package from unstable?
[16:16] <vorlon> ah because it's currently built from a source that has a delta so won't autosync
[16:16] <vorlon> accepted
[16:17] <RikMills> yep, and thanks
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oxygen-sounds [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [4:5.24.90-1]
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (focal-backports/main) [13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1 => 13.6ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (bionic-backports/main) [13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo18.04.1 => 13.6ubuntu1~bpo18.04.1] (core)
[16:50] <ddstreet> mapreri if you have time, can you review debhelper in b/f-backports queues?
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memtest86+ (focal-backports/main) [5.01-3.1ubuntu2.1 => 5.31b+dfsg-4~bpo20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freerdp2 (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu2 => 2.6.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[19:49] <coreycb> bdmurray: hello, if you get a chance could you take a look at cinder in the impish unapproved queue?
[19:56] <bdmurray> coreycb: I'll see what I can do
[19:56] <coreycb> bdmurray: thanks
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.1 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orcania [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orcania [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orcania [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tesseract [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tesseract [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tesseract [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tesseract [i386] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orcania [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orcania [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orcania [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orcania [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orcania [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orcania [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tesseract [i386] (kinetic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tesseract [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orcania [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tesseract [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1]
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tesseract [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orcania [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1]
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orcania [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backintime (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3 => 1.2.1-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected backintime [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.1-3ubuntu0.1]
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+ds-1] (no packageset)