[07:00] <RAOF> Huh. What has caused https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/kinetic/update_excuses.html#mir to leave old riscv and s390x binaries behind?
[07:01] <seb128> RAOF, NBS binaries are not autocleaned, so my guess would be whoever did a NBS round did it before the new version had built on those archs yet
[07:01] <RAOF> Those binaries are indeed not built by the new package, but why only complain about riscv & s390x?
[07:02] <seb128> RAOF, on fact, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/2.7.0-0ubuntu4 explain it
[07:02] <seb128> that version only built on those architectures
[07:03] <RAOF> !!! I didn't notice that, because how would it only build there 🤪
[07:03] <seb128> RAOF, because we ignore test results on those archs?
[07:04] <seb128> RAOF, anyway, just clean the NBS binaries from proposed now :)
[07:04] <RAOF> Yeah, will do.
[07:05] <RAOF> Huh. I thought we ran wlcs on all (little-endian) archs. 🤷‍♀️
[07:07] <RAOF> Oh! Does *launchpad* build with `DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck` on riscv?
[07:08] <RAOF> The More You Know!
[07:09] <seb128> RAOF, yes, since the arch was added, it would have make really difficult to start the port otherwise
[07:09] <RAOF> Fair!
[07:09] <cpaelzer> And it is already slow, might as well have been partially a capacity/speed reason
[07:10] <seb128> also I don't think we have the builders to keep up otherwise
[07:10] <seb128> what cpaelzer said
[07:47] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I've added the arguments/details I mentioned to 1890263 - let me know if that is enough to reconsider (we will re-upload to SRU queue then) or not (fine as well - keep it on Won't Fix but untag server-todo then)
[10:52] <mwhudson> actually focal was built with tests enabled for riscv, they were only disabled in gutsy (which makes for a surprise or two when SRUing things)