[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tesseract [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1]
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tesseract [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1]
[03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[03:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[03:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[13:40] <RikMills> ubuntu-archive: please accept kalander synced from debian. this is one of the few missing parts of KDE gear 22.04 (we had packaged and uploaded the rest ahead of debian)
[13:40] <RikMills> users have been requesting kalander a fair bit
[13:43] <tsimonq2> On a similar note, it's worth noting that when the LXQt 1.1 stack lands, there's two source NEW packages. Debian has become pretty inactive so if I don't see anything by late this cycle I'll make sure that we're making changes in Debian too (I'd like to give the existing maintainers the benefit of the doubt before I just upload over their stuff)
[14:17] <jbicha> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html is out of date again
[14:50] <bdmurray> jbicha: I'm looking on snakefruit and its up to date
[14:51] <bdmurray> and now its fine for me
[14:51] <bdmurray> oops, pending-sru vs phased-updates
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[14:57] <bdmurray> anyway, I'll look into it
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalendar [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1]
[15:33] <falcojr> sil2100 (or other vanguard for today?): cloud-init has an SRU for B, F, I, and J per <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1974235> . If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete
[16:33] <icey[m]> hey bdmurray - I've verified https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1883112 , but I'm not sure what to do about the Incomplete focal, it seems like it should still be fix-committed as it's in proposed?
[16:45] <bdmurray> icey[m]: I set it to Incomplete based on comment #11. So you were able to verify it despite the other bug Liam reported?
[16:46] <icey[m]> bdmurray: yeah I was, I'm kind of curious given that the linked bug is fixed in jammy, but not impish, but the test-case worked perfectly for me
[16:50] <bdmurray> slyon: I've updated the autopkgtest environment with the cross arch filtering
[17:02] <bdmurray> icey[m]: I'd feel better if we knew what happend with Liam's verification
[17:47] <icey[m]> bdmurray: indeed - I'm wonderinf if it's because I have nothing setting up TLS in my environment
[17:47] <icey[m]> wondering*
[18:16] <icey[m]> bdmurray: some digging around and i'm fairly confident (will bug gnuoy about it) that I'm not hitting that issue because I'm. not setting up Vault in my environment (so no certificates)
[18:19] <icey[m]> reading through the charm's setup, paired with the setup code referenced in ceph-iscsi suggests that we're skipping the affected code entirely
[18:26] <icey[m]> bdmurray: and I've commented on the bug about it as well now
[18:54] <jbicha> upstream keeps asking me about when the gnome-remote-desktop update will reach jammy, so I'm passing along the request to release it to jammy-updates
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalendar [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (no packageset)
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalendar [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (no packageset)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalendar [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalendar [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1]
[20:04] <tsimonq2> LXQt 1.1 incoming. source NEW packages are qtxdg-tools and xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt
[20:04] <tsimonq2> I'm a bit rusty on source NEW... please be patient :)
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cinder [source] (impish-proposed) [2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:06] <bdmurray> coreycb: there's an exisiting SRU of cinder for impish which is unverified
[20:07] <coreycb> bdmurray: the new one should include the existing one in its changes file
[20:09] <bdmurray> coreycb: Okay, I see that now
[20:09] <coreycb> ok, thanks bdmurray
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cinder [source] (impish-proposed) [2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:35] <seb128> is the autopkgtest infra comparing the architecture to the dpkg or target one?
[20:36] <seb128> in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604809772/espeak-ng_1.51+dfsg-7ubuntu1_1.51+dfsg-7ubuntu2.diff.gz I changed the fuzz test to be Architecture: amd64 arm64'
[20:36] <seb128> but the log on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/i386/e/espeak-ng/20220602_102529_0f2f4@/log.gz states
[20:36] <seb128> 'fuzz                 FAIL badpkg'
[20:36] <seb128> is there another way to filter out i386?
[20:37] <seb128> similarly the 'tests' one was marked !i386 but
[20:37] <seb128> tests                FAIL non-zero exit status 25
[20:41] <jbicha> seb128: I was thinking earlier today that maybe you should add back skip-not-installable
[20:41] <seb128> jbicha, that wouldn't solve the fact that tests is failing on i386
[20:42] <seb128> jbicha, I proposed https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/+git/britney/+merge/423674 but that didn't get accepted
[20:42] <seb128> I'm a bit stucked on what to do there
[20:43] <seb128> stuck
[20:49] <bdmurray> seb128: there was a very recent change regarding cross architecture testing https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development/+merge/423176
[20:51] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks, those test results are newer that the commit merge though. Unless the production system is lagging behind?
[20:51] <bdmurray> seb128: I manually updated the server a couple(?) of hours ago
[20:52] <bdmurray> the code isn't currently auto updated
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: qtxdg-tools (kinetic-proposed/primary) [3.9.1-0ubuntu1]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:11] <seb128> bdmurray, k, I will retry the test now, thanks
[21:12] <seb128> and calling it a day on that note
[21:29] <mwhudson> good morning
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]