[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tesseract [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1] [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tesseract [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-osrf-testing-tools-cpp [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.5.1+ds-1] [03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset) [03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset) [03:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset) [03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset) [03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset) [03:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-performance-test-fixture [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset) [13:40] ubuntu-archive: please accept kalander synced from debian. this is one of the few missing parts of KDE gear 22.04 (we had packaged and uploaded the rest ahead of debian) [13:40] users have been requesting kalander a fair bit [13:43] On a similar note, it's worth noting that when the LXQt 1.1 stack lands, there's two source NEW packages. Debian has become pretty inactive so if I don't see anything by late this cycle I'll make sure that we're making changes in Debian too (I'd like to give the existing maintainers the benefit of the doubt before I just upload over their stuff) [14:17] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html is out of date again [14:50] jbicha: I'm looking on snakefruit and its up to date [14:51] and now its fine for me [14:51] oops, pending-sru vs phased-updates [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1] [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1] [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1] [14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1] [14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1] [14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-performance-test-fixture [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.8-1] [14:57] anyway, I'll look into it [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalendar [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] [15:33] sil2100 (or other vanguard for today?): cloud-init has an SRU for B, F, I, and J per . If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete [15:33] Launchpad bug 1974235 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.1-14 to 22.2) Bionic, Focal, Impish, Jammy" [Undecided, New] [16:33] hey bdmurray - I've verified https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1883112 , but I'm not sure what to do about the Incomplete focal, it seems like it should still be fix-committed as it's in proposed? [16:33] Launchpad bug 1883112 in ceph-iscsi (Ubuntu Focal) "rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError" [High, Incomplete] [16:45] icey[m]: I set it to Incomplete based on comment #11. So you were able to verify it despite the other bug Liam reported? [16:46] bdmurray: yeah I was, I'm kind of curious given that the linked bug is fixed in jammy, but not impish, but the test-case worked perfectly for me [16:50] slyon: I've updated the autopkgtest environment with the cross arch filtering [17:02] icey[m]: I'd feel better if we knew what happend with Liam's verification [17:47] bdmurray: indeed - I'm wonderinf if it's because I have nothing setting up TLS in my environment [17:47] wondering* [18:16] bdmurray: some digging around and i'm fairly confident (will bug gnuoy about it) that I'm not hitting that issue because I'm. not setting up Vault in my environment (so no certificates) [18:19] reading through the charm's setup, paired with the setup code referenced in ceph-iscsi suggests that we're skipping the affected code entirely [18:26] bdmurray: and I've commented on the bug about it as well now [18:54] upstream keeps asking me about when the gnome-remote-desktop update will reach jammy, so I'm passing along the request to release it to jammy-updates [19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalendar [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (no packageset) [19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalendar [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (no packageset) [19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalendar [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] [19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalendar [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] [20:04] LXQt 1.1 incoming. source NEW packages are qtxdg-tools and xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt [20:04] I'm a bit rusty on source NEW... please be patient :) [20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cinder [source] (impish-proposed) [2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1] [20:06] coreycb: there's an exisiting SRU of cinder for impish which is unverified [20:07] bdmurray: the new one should include the existing one in its changes file [20:09] coreycb: Okay, I see that now [20:09] ok, thanks bdmurray [20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cinder [source] (impish-proposed) [2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1] [20:35] is the autopkgtest infra comparing the architecture to the dpkg or target one? [20:36] in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604809772/espeak-ng_1.51+dfsg-7ubuntu1_1.51+dfsg-7ubuntu2.diff.gz I changed the fuzz test to be Architecture: amd64 arm64' [20:36] but the log on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/i386/e/espeak-ng/20220602_102529_0f2f4@/log.gz states [20:36] 'fuzz FAIL badpkg' [20:36] is there another way to filter out i386? [20:37] similarly the 'tests' one was marked !i386 but [20:37] tests FAIL non-zero exit status 25 [20:41] seb128: I was thinking earlier today that maybe you should add back skip-not-installable [20:41] jbicha, that wouldn't solve the fact that tests is failing on i386 [20:42] jbicha, I proposed https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/+git/britney/+merge/423674 but that didn't get accepted [20:42] I'm a bit stucked on what to do there [20:43] stuck [20:49] seb128: there was a very recent change regarding cross architecture testing https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development/+merge/423176 [20:51] bdmurray, thanks, those test results are newer that the commit merge though. Unless the production system is lagging behind? [20:51] seb128: I manually updated the server a couple(?) of hours ago [20:52] the code isn't currently auto updated [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: qtxdg-tools (kinetic-proposed/primary) [3.9.1-0ubuntu1] [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.2.0-0ubuntu1] [21:11] bdmurray, k, I will retry the test now, thanks [21:12] and calling it a day on that note [21:29] good morning [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset) [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset) [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: luajit2 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1-20220411-1] (no packageset) [23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coturn [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3.1] (no packageset) [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1] [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1] [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1] [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted luajit2 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1-20220411-1] [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coturn [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [4.5.2-3.1]