[14:31] <cpaelzer> o/
[14:31] <sarnold> good morning
[14:31] <slyon> hello \o
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:31] <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:31:21 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[14:31] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[14:31] <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage
[14:31] <cpaelzer> hello everyone
[14:31] <joalif> o/
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #topic Review of previous action items
[14:31] <cpaelzer> none
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
[14:31] <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:32] <didrocks> hey
[14:32] <cpaelzer> libcaca->freeglut seems new
[14:32] <didrocks> it’s a packaging mistake apparently, will be fixed by next sync with Debian
[14:32] <cpaelzer> ok goo, we'll ignore it then
[14:32] <cpaelzer> aisleriot->guile-3.0 as well
[14:32] <sarnold> usb-creator -> libisoburn -> libisofs -> jigit feels new
[14:32] <cpaelzer> and finally tk -> xterm (was that a false positive, it feels known to me)
[14:33] <slyon> usb-creator has been discussed (and assigned) during last week's foundations metting. will be handled by foundations
[14:33] <sarnold> woo
[14:33] <cpaelzer> ok - thanks slyon considering that handled then
[14:33] <didrocks> tk/xterm rings a bell to me too
[14:33] <didrocks> I guess aisleriot will be on me to figure out
[14:34] <cpaelzer> ok didrocks
[14:34] <slyon> yes, tk has been around for a while
[14:34] <cpaelzer> I'm looking after tk/xterm right now if it was aknown false positive
[14:34] <sarnold> Tue 05 14:48:13 < cpaelzer> tk -> xterm was the newest false positive last week
[14:35] <cpaelzer> ok then
[14:35] <cpaelzer> we all did remember a bit, next time we will remember it better
[14:35] <sarnold> :D
[14:36] <cpaelzer> ok all assigned then
[14:36] <cpaelzer> great
[14:36] <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
[14:36] <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
[14:36] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:36] <cpaelzer> three
[14:36] <cpaelzer> bug 1977551
[14:36] <cpaelzer> bug 1972866
[14:36] <cpaelzer> bug 1976405
[14:36] <cpaelzer> let us cross review those
[14:37] <cpaelzer> two are from foundations (the last two)
[14:37] <cpaelzer> let me pick libntlm
[14:37] <cpaelzer> anyone up for gsasl?
[14:37] <slyon> I can do lerc. It's related to the other BT codec MIR that I did 2 weeks ago
[14:37] <cpaelzer> and slyon could look at lerc
[14:37] <didrocks> I will pick lerc then
[14:37] <cpaelzer> awesome
[14:37] <cpaelzer> wait
[14:37] <didrocks> ah ok :)
[14:37] <cpaelzer> lerc = slyon, libntlm = me, gasal = didrocks ?
[14:37] <didrocks> as this was desktopish, I was on the starting block :)
[14:37] <cpaelzer> ?
[14:37] <didrocks> ack on gasal
[14:37] <sarnold> lerc is an image thing, not bluetooth?
[14:38] <slyon> sarnold: ah.. possibly :) anyway it's the only non-Foundations MIR, so its mine
[14:38] <sarnold> \o/
[14:39] <cpaelzer> good all assigned
[14:39] <cpaelzer> jamespage: joalif: you got the easy week this time :-)
[14:39] <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[14:39] <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:39] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:39] <joalif> :D
[14:39] <cpaelzer> thw IWD comment is interesting
[14:39] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iwd/+bug/1971739
[14:40] <cpaelzer> TL;DR bringing in IWD will not discontinue wpa_supplicant
[14:40] <cpaelzer> which I guess is fine - one still wants the better things of IWD
[14:40] <cpaelzer> but Desktop+Security needs to be aware they will most likely end up supporting both
[14:40] <slyon> ACK
[14:40] <cpaelzer> carry that to the teams please for awareness
[14:41] <didrocks> I will do
[14:41] <sarnold> ack
[14:41] <cpaelzer> and keep it in mind when reviewing - as we usually require the demotion of the alternative
[14:41] <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
[14:41] <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
[14:41] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:41] <sarnold> ell and telegraf are in progress :D
[14:41] <cpaelzer> \o/
[14:42] <slyon> wrt. iwd: It was one of the review TODOs: "#1: descibe how/when we will be able to demote src:wpa (wpa_supplicant)"
[14:42] <cpaelzer> this is great sarnold, but ...
[14:42] <cpaelzer> Nevertheless this is filling faster than it gets drained
[14:42] <cpaelzer> have you reached out to the team to help you now instead of any panic late in the cycle
[14:43] <sarnold> yes; others have been assigned, but not yet started; I'm hopeful we will get some traction on additional ones soon
[14:43] <cpaelzer> slyon: yeah this TODO is essentially invalid by the update we got
[14:43] <cpaelzer> sarnold: ok, thanks for the info
[14:43] <cpaelzer> and now something new - first time
[14:43] <cpaelzer> This link is "internal" so not all can open it
[14:43] <slyon> yes. the "how" would be: "not at all"
[14:43] <cpaelzer> but still it will be helpful for those in the MIR team that are here
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Internal link
[14:44] <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
[14:44] <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
[14:44] <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
[14:44] <cpaelzer> we will check this weekly
[14:44] <cpaelzer> and each of us can ensure that our teams items are in there and ranked accoridng to our needs
[14:44] <cpaelzer> helping sarnold and friends even more to pick those we need mst desparately
[14:44] <cpaelzer> -e
[14:45] <cpaelzer> if there is anything, ask sarnold here or comment on the cards
[14:45] <cpaelzer> with that being said I'd go on to
[14:45] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[14:45] <cpaelzer> I have one topic
[14:45] <sarnold> apparently they can't just be dragged and dropped around like the old trello cards, but the little bars or chevrons etc indicate priority
[14:45] <cpaelzer> I can't even count the number of times I said "Review of previous action items" -> "None"
[14:46] <cpaelzer> We are no more using those kind of actions - we use LP bugs and GH PR reviews for all that happened in the last few months
[14:47] <cpaelzer> the question I have is
[14:47] <cpaelzer> should we keep that for when it will be needed?
[14:47] <cpaelzer> or should we get rid of this - semingly useless - 10 second interrupt
[14:47] <sarnold> i'm guessing not, it feels a bit redundant for this section
[14:47] <didrocks> or maybe we can keep any questions to the AOB, yeah
[14:47] <sarnold> I think we can remove it without missing anything
[14:47] <didrocks> even if that was from previous meetings
[14:47] <didrocks> agreed
[14:47] <cpaelzer> yep
[14:47] <cpaelzer> that would be my preference
[14:47] <slyon> +1
[14:48] <cpaelzer> joalif: opposing opinions?
[14:48] <slyon> (for removing it)
[14:48] <sarnold> (sorry meetingbot)
[14:48] <joalif> nope i'm good with that
[14:48] <slyon> I have one topic, too: https://github.com/cpaelzer/ubuntu-mir/pull/11/files – suggested a small update to the wording
[14:48] <cpaelzer> action items removed - thanks everyone
[14:48] <slyon> WDYT?
[14:48] <cpaelzer> now to the PR of slyon
[14:49] <didrocks> slyon: +1 for me, especially the second line :)
[14:49] <joalif> +1
[14:49] <sarnold> +1
[14:49] <cpaelzer> sorry dleay, I still need to translate what sarnold menat with chevrons, only makes sense for me in stargate "lock in chevron six, ..."
[14:49] <cpaelzer> ok, now looking at the PR :-)
[14:50] <cpaelzer> fine for me slyon
[14:50] <cpaelzer> it is interesting that after the explanations we had you now more add further text in the RULE section above
[14:50] <cpaelzer> but I'm fine
[14:50] <cpaelzer> +1
[14:50] <cpaelzer> we have enough +1 - I'm merging this right away then
[14:51] <slyon> thanks! cpaelzer could you merge it and update the wiki, using your precious token?
[14:51] <didrocks> (do they have the 9th chevron though?)
[14:51] <sarnold> I hope our queue doesn't get deep enough to need a ninth chevron!
[14:51] <didrocks> :p
[14:52] <cpaelzer> sarnold: but if 8 gets you another galaxy where does 9 lead you
[14:52] <didrocks> or it means that you can spin of your team, but I’m sidetracking :p
[14:52] <cpaelzer> back to business - I have merged the PR
[14:52] <cpaelzer> in wiki and git
[14:52] <cpaelzer> thanks slyon
[14:53] <sarnold> oh if we could fork off a clone of the team we'd really be cooking with induction :)
[14:53] <cpaelzer> We had an induction sprint in CPH, not much cooking involved :-P
[14:53] <sarnold> lol
[14:53] <slyon> :D
[14:53] <cpaelzer> anything else or should we close for today?
[14:54] <sarnold> nothing from me
[14:54] <joalif> nothing
[14:54] <didrocks> nothing
[14:54] <cpaelzer> good
[14:54] <cpaelzer> thank you all - as always!
[14:54] <cpaelzer> #endmeeting
[14:54] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 14:54:21 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-06-07-14.31.moin.txt
[14:54] <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :)
[14:54] <joalif> thanks cpaelzer, all
[14:54] <didrocks> thanks!
[14:54] <slyon> thanks!