[00:39] <KGB-0> gnome-font-viewer Janitor 312463 * commented merge request !2 * https://deb.li/3qjEx
[05:35] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[06:00] <duflu> Hi seb128 
[06:20] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:22] <duflu> Morning oSoMoN 
[06:38] <oSoMoN> hey duflu 
[06:51] <seb128> hey duflu, oSoMoN, how are you?
[06:55] <duflu> seb128, going OK though now I've just figured out there's a spider in the vent above my head. Wonder if I can stay calm till EOD and solve it then. How are you?
[06:56] <seb128> I'm not feeling great today, I think I got a stomach bug from the kids, let's see how the day is going
[06:57] <duflu> :(
[07:04] <lissyx> oSoMoN, thanks, also for the bugzilla portal answer, I guess I can start fixing that point
[07:05] <lissyx> oSoMoN, one thing I was wondering is how you want to handle bugs that are 100% packaging / snap, like the one about system-package-doc
[07:07] <lissyx> next thing I'll have to  tacke is building a snap using my local git cinnabar tree ...
[07:07] <didrocks> good morning
[07:07] <seb128> lut didrocks, en forme ?
[07:09] <didrocks> salut seb128, ça va, et toi ?
[07:16] <duflu> Morning didrocks 
[07:19] <didrocks> hey duflu 
[07:26] <seb128> didrocks, bof, je crois que j'ai une gastro, me suis réveillé avec un mal de ventre et ça ne s'améliore pas
[07:28] <didrocks> argh, bon courage !
[07:40] <seb128> 'ci
[08:17] <oSoMoN> seb128, repose-toi, c’est ce qu’il y a de mieux à faire dans ces cas-là
[08:18] <oSoMoN> lissyx, I don't think there's a generic answer to snap-specific bugs that cannot be fixed in firefox itself, in the case of the system-packages-doc one, I'd say the conversation needs to continue with the snapd team, hence the suggestion to open a PR
[08:18] <oSoMoN> (against snapd)
[08:35] <lissyx> oSoMoN, an issue you mean I guess ?
[08:36] <oSoMoN> lissyx, I think a PR that adds the required path to the existing interface is likely to get more immediate feedback from the snapd team than an issue, but a post on the snapcraft forum or a bug on launchpad (against the snapd project) would also work
[08:37] <lissyx> I always feel a PR too intrusive, from the maintainer perspective, that's why I was asking
[08:53] <lissyx> oSoMoN, besides a full rebuild from your firefox-snap/snapcraft.yml, there is no quick way to test some change?
[09:05] <lissyx> (replacing the hg clone with a git clone from my local repo seems to do the trick :) )
[13:01] <lissyx> oSoMoN, now my telemetry is fixed, it looks like there was a few buidid mismatch reports on snap package
[13:01] <lissyx> 20th-21st of may as well as 28
[16:40] <lissyx> oSoMoN, I'm starting to have something working for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1772063
[16:42] <lissyx> oSoMoN, I guessy you can apply it on your stable/beta builds ?
[17:16] <lissyx> oSoMoN, ready for you review, it works well for me https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D148782
[17:30] <oSoMoN> lissyx, excellent, I'll have a look later tonight, thanks
[18:11] <lissyx> oSoMoN, I have some fix pending, emilio already did some review, I'm rebuilding the package and verifying, and I'll finish the PortalKind requested changes tomorrow morning
[18:15] <oSoMoN> great!
[18:19] <lissyx> looks like it's working locally
[18:19] <lissyx> I guess it's  a good time to sign off :)