[07:33] <ernstp> Do I have to be an official Ubuntu dev to follow the SRU process or can anyone do it? I got that impression from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates ...
[07:41] <seb128> ernstp, anyone can do, you will just need a dev to sponsor the actual package upload for you
[07:42] <ernstp> (jammy caught some bad luck with openconnect/network-manager-openconnect release timing...)
[16:05] <Guest2> hello, i have a question about a build failure i'm getting.
[16:06] <Guest2> i'm getting this error The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[16:06] <Guest2>  sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: python3-pyppeteer but it is not installable
[16:06] <Guest2> it seems like pyppeteer is not available
[16:10] <Guest2> hello
[16:10] <Guest2> i'm not sure if my question went through
[16:11] <schopin> Guest2: it did. Are you trying to build a package from the archive?
[16:12] <Guest2> thank you.  i'm trying to build a package from my ppa
[16:13] <schopin> Well, looks like your Python package depends on a package from pip that hasn't been package in Debian nor Ubuntu yet. You'll need to ship that package in your PPA as well.
[16:14] <Guest2> ahh... ok that makes sense.  not completely sure how to do that yet.
[17:46] <ahasenack> since chown -R is frowned upon in maintainer scripts (https://lintian.debian.org/tags/recursive-privilege-change), I'm unsure how one should go about changing ownership of an unknown amount of files in postinst
[17:46] <ahasenack> i.e., "chown /var/log/frr/* > /dev/null 2>&1 | ::"?
[17:46] <ahasenack> the lintian tag also frowns upon using find()
[17:52] <tumbleweed> my (uninformed) guess is that you could avoid the hardlink attack by restricting them with find (find -links 1)
[18:00] <ahasenack> debian codesearch has some hits on things like
[18:00] <ahasenack>         chown $USER:$GROUP /var/lib/vdr/* > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
[18:00] <tumbleweed> that lintian tag may be new
[18:00] <tumbleweed> I hadn't come across it before
[18:01] <ahasenack> it was renamed from another one, which was more verbose
[18:01] <ahasenack> but was still about the same thing: recursive chown/chmod
[19:37] <enr0n> vorlon: It doesn't look like bdr_ung was able to get to sponsoring LP: #1977320 today. Can you please take a look?
[20:04] <vorlon> enr0n: sure thing
[20:05] <enr0n> vorlon: thanks!
[21:01] <vorlon> enr0n: do we know why these tests are running more slowly on ppc64el than on other archs, and if there's something we should be doing to improve the autopkgtest infrastructure?