[14:58] <jawn-smith> o/
[14:59] <mclemenceau> o/
[14:59] <dbungert> o/
[14:59] <bdrung> \o
[15:00] <ginggs> o/
[15:00] <slyon> o/
[15:00] <enr0n> o/
[15:00] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <bdmurray> o/
[15:00] <juliank> o/
[15:00] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:55 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:01] <jawn-smith> #topic Lightning Round
[15:01] <jawn-smith> The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundation-team-updates-thursday-09-june-2022/28788
[15:01] <jawn-smith> Let's all take some time to review and ask questions
[15:02]  * bdmurray reads
[15:02] <jawn-smith> ginggs: were those FTBFS reports for jammy or kinetic?
[15:02] <jawn-smith> or both?
[15:03] <bdmurray> woo usb-creator
[15:03] <ginggs> jawn-smith: these are for amd64-v2 and amd64-v3
[15:03] <ginggs> in jammy
[15:04] <jawn-smith> ah cool. I uploaded a fix for icu's FTBFS yesterday
[15:04] <bdmurray> Wehn will systemd be uploaded?
[15:04] <jawn-smith> to the unapproved queue
[15:04] <doko> I'll start the kinetic ones next week.
[15:05] <enr0n> Targeting the end of the month for systemd 251
[15:05] <jawn-smith> Any other questions?
[15:06] <bdmurray> Not from me
[15:06] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:06] <jawn-smith> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:06] <jawn-smith> bug 1977564
[15:06] <bdmurray> ubuntu-meta is a shared custody package and that looks handled
[15:07] <jawn-smith> okay, so nothing to do here? Should we remove the tag?
[15:07] <vorlon> no, it's not our tag to remove
[15:07] <bdmurray> no, because its useful for other teams too
[15:07] <vorlon> the desktop team needs to triage it
[15:07] <jawn-smith> Right, I didn't know if they had already triaged it
[15:08] <jawn-smith> moving on then
[15:08] <jawn-smith> bug 1977644
[15:08] <bdmurray> This bug report is the result of some deep investigation into bug 1922342
[15:09] <bdmurray> Oh, I'm supposed to do something here
[15:10] <jawn-smith> Okay, let's card and assign to bdmurray then
[15:10] <jawn-smith> We'll assign to bdmurray for the test, then someone else can do the fix
[15:10] <jawn-smith> Perhaps mwhudson
[15:11] <jawn-smith> mclemenceau: do you mind carding this one?
[15:11] <mclemenceau> sure thing
[15:11] <jawn-smith> thanks!
[15:11] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:11] <jawn-smith> bug 1977493
[15:12]  * jawn-smith reads the long discussion
[15:13] <jawn-smith> vorlon: looks like you marked this as triaged for u-r-u
[15:13] <jawn-smith> and based on comment 9 it seems there is work to be done on this
[15:13] <jawn-smith> so let's card it and move on
[15:13] <vorlon> thanks
[15:14] <jawn-smith> The other jj bug is the casper bug we discussed earlier
[15:15] <jawn-smith> rls-ii and rls-ff are empty
[15:15] <jawn-smith>  #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:16] <jawn-smith> oof, extra whitespace
[15:16] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:16] <jawn-smith> vorlon:
[15:16] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:16] <vorlon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:16] <vorlon> not looking terrible!
[15:16] <vorlon> doko: any progress on dash?
[15:18] <doko> ahh, crap
[15:18] <vorlon> :)
[15:18] <vorlon> doko: will you get it in the next week?
[15:19] <doko> yes
[15:19] <vorlon> licensecheck has an MIR in progress; per side discussion I've just added a task on licensecheck itself to LP: #1972853 so that it gets linked from the report
[15:19] <schopin> for licensecheck, the MIR should be shortly unblocked (polishing a patch right now), but the sphinx part is a bit more complicated
[15:21] <vorlon> sphinx is also in progress; schopin, it looks like you're still on this so I'll open a task in your name to get it on the report
[15:21] <slyon> I also linked LP: #1972853 to sphinx update-excuse
[15:21] <vorlon> ah great thanks
[15:21] <vorlon> and mutt also has an MIR in progress
[15:21] <jawn-smith> two of them!
[15:22] <vorlon> enr0n: I see you've provided a patch for paramiko vs libcloud, what is still needed for this to land and clear?
[15:23] <vorlon> I see you've said you're sending the patch upstream - do you need sponsorship?
[15:23] <enr0n> vorlon: I believe bdrung is going to take another look, and hopefully sponsore, later today.
[15:23] <vorlon> ok
[15:23] <bdrung> that's the plan
[15:23] <vorlon> should be close to bdrung's EOD, so if he doesn't get to it today feel free to ping me
[15:24] <enr0n> vorlon: ack, thanks
[15:24] <vorlon> oh weird, I had just refreshed the report and python-httplib2 was showing as a candidate but wasn't on update_output, refreshed again and it's resolved
[15:25] <vorlon> usb-creator is an MIR, alexghiti can you open a task on the MIR bug so that it gets linked from the report?
[15:25] <alexghiti> Yes, I just did it
[15:25] <vorlon> thanks
[15:26] <vorlon> now we're into the new stuff, and not much of it
[15:26] <vorlon> jawn-smith: can you take libjson-perl?
[15:26] <jawn-smith> sure
[15:26] <vorlon> aptdaemon vs iso-codes - bdrung ?
[15:27] <bdrung> okay
[15:27] <slyon> I retriggered systemd against -release. as I suppose the tinyssh failure is from -proposed
[15:28] <vorlon> slyon: ok, I'll consider this yours to follow up on
[15:28] <slyon> sure!
[15:28] <vorlon> and then ubuntu-meta was discussed above, it's basically the desktop team's to resolve
[15:28] <vorlon> so that's it for this week
[15:28] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[15:28] <vorlon> everybody else can do +1 maintenance work in lieu ;p
[15:29] <jawn-smith> ginggs: do you need to talk about FTBFS reports at all?
[15:29] <jawn-smith> any prolonged absences coming up?
[15:29] <enr0n> I will be out tomorrow
[15:29] <schopin> Ah, à propos de FTBFS!
[15:30] <schopin> openssl currently FTBFS < jammy, should I fix it now or wait to bundle it with something else?
[15:30] <ginggs> jawn-smith: retries still ongoing
[15:32] <jawn-smith> oh, DMB voting is open
[15:32] <slyon> schopin: at very least you could fix it and get the SRU into -proposed. using a 'block-proposed-jammy' tag
[15:32] <jawn-smith> vote if you're eligible
[15:32] <schopin> slyon: ooooh, I like that!
[15:32] <slyon> this way it would not hold back any potential security updates that might or might not pop up
[15:33] <bdmurray> schopin: also the autopkgtest queues are rather empty so getting it tested sooner would be better
[15:34] <schopin> sure, I was mostly worried about forcing users to download libssl3 again for no gain from their PoV
[15:35] <bdmurray> Right that's a valid concern.
[15:35] <vorlon> indeed, that's why we implemented support for block-proposed-* tags on SRUs :)
[15:36] <jawn-smith> Sounds like the openssl issue is settled then.
[15:36] <jawn-smith> Anything else?
[15:37] <bdmurray> When a card is added for a bug a release task should be added and the rls-XX- tag removed
[15:38] <bdmurray> This is something I've done behind the scenes
[15:38] <jawn-smith> mclemenceau: is that something lp-to-jira could do?
[15:39] <mclemenceau> possibly ;) would have to look at this, would be nice indeed
[15:40] <jawn-smith> Okay anything else?
[15:43] <bdmurray> nope
[15:43] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[15:43] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:43:13 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-06-09-15.00.moin.txt