=== guruprasad changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: guruprasad (Indian Standard Time UTC+0530 hrs) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[05:55] <ciphrCat> what kind of markdown is supported in bug reports?  Does ~some text~ work for a strikethrough?
[07:27] <guruprasad> ciphrCat, markdown is not supported. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/391780
[07:27] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 391780 in Launchpad itself "Support Markdown 'stack overflow' style hyperlinks markup" [Low, Triaged]
[16:37] <ciphrCat> ah, thanks. At least it’ll be easy to remember
[16:41] <tobi> cjwatson: thank you very much, it is working now.
[21:00] <RikMills> DEBUG Considering changefile 91106/ubuntu/plasma-workspace_5.25.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04~ppa2_arm64.changes
[21:00] <RikMills> DEBUG Finding fresh policy
[21:00] <RikMills> INFO Processing upload plasma-workspace_5.25.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04~ppa2_arm64.changes
[21:00] <RikMills> INFO Rejection during accept. Aborting partial accept.
[21:00] <RikMills> INFO Upload was rejected:
[21:00] <RikMills> INFO 	[lplibrarian-public-upload.internal:10004]: [Errno -2] Name or service not known
[21:01] <RikMills> INFO Committing the transaction and any mails associated with this upload.
[21:01] <RikMills> huh?
[21:13] <cjwatson> RikMills: when was that from?  not today it seems ...
[21:14] <RikMills> cjwatson: yes, today at 21:59 
[21:14] <cjwatson> oh I see, somehow my grep missed that
[21:15] <RikMills> https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ninjas/+archive/ubuntu/plasma/+build/23846798
[21:15] <cjwatson> ah, because I can't type
[21:15] <cjwatson> I guess we have occasional internal DNS issues, but I'm off for the next two days so won't be something I'm looking at :)
[21:15] <cjwatson> simplest immediate workaround will just be to retry the build of course
[21:16] <RikMills> ok, kool. 2nd time that build did that, but it is superceded now anyway
[21:16] <cjwatson> somebody who isn't off should raise this with IS though
[21:16] <cjwatson> (who will probably need to escalate it to BootStack)
[21:17] <RikMills> I have a retry scrip that will just poke until it succeeds ;)
[21:17] <cjwatson> well yeah, but good to chase down this sort of cloud reliability issue
[21:17] <RikMills> indeed, hence my mentioning it
[21:19] <RikMills> anyway, thanks :)