| Khepra | Hello. Debian recently had a regular kernel security upgrade which was actually a rebase to 5.10.120 which includes the massive changes in the random subsystem. I don't see this change in current ubuntu LTS kernels (regular or HWE). How can I find out whether this change is planned? Other than auditing changelogs before upgrade? | 09:44 |
|---|---|---|
| tjaalton | Khepra: it is in 5.15.44, which jammy will eventually get | 11:29 |
| Khepra | tjaalton: k, thanks. btw, what's ubuntu kernel's team's opinion on such a radical change mid-LTS? | 13:59 |
| Khepra | (LTS kernel I mean) | 13:59 |
| tjaalton | I doubt we'll revert upstream decisions | 14:04 |
| Khepra | then that makes RHEL the only enterprise friendly distro, unfortunately. | 14:12 |
| tjaalton | because? | 14:24 |
| xnox | rhel applies humoungous amount of changes to their kernels during its life, well above and beyond what is even acceptable for regular linux-stable trees =/ | 16:49 |
| Sylwah | Hello, quick question. I believe I am impacted by a kernel bug: encrypted zfs read/write on 5.15.0-37 is about 10x slower than on 5.15.0-27. I can 100% repro across several machines, with the only change being booting a different kernel. This includes writing to a mirror zfs pool backed by a ramdisk (in tmpfs). Is this the right forum to discuss, | 20:13 |
| Sylwah | or Launchpad? | 20:13 |
| sarnold | probably launchpad, irc doesn't get nearly the use it once did | 20:14 |
| Sylwah | I will, thank you. Finally, should I report to zfs, or linux-generic? | 20:15 |
| sarnold | I think linux is probably better, but I'm not positive on that one | 20:17 |
| Sylwah | I'll figure it out. Thank you, have a great day/evening/night :) | 20:17 |
| sarnold | you too :) thanks! | 20:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!