| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| rbasak | u-d-a@ moderation please | 08:02 |
|---|---|---|
| rbasak | !no dmb-ping is rbasak, sil2100, teward, bdmurray, kanashiro, seb128, utkarsh2102: DMB ping | 08:33 |
| utkarsh2102 | \o | 08:34 |
| seb128 | rbasak, yes? | 08:34 |
| seb128 | ah, testing the updated list right? | 08:35 |
| Unit193 | !no dmb-ping is <reply> bdmurray, kanashiro, rbasak, seb128, sil2100, teward, utkarsh2102: DMB ping | 08:35 |
| ubottu | I'll remember that, Unit193 | 08:35 |
| rbasak | Just updating the list to add Utkarsh | 08:35 |
| Unit193 | rbasak: Needs more sort. | 08:35 |
| rbasak | I didn't think the DMB members needed sorting? | 08:36 |
| rbasak | But sure, thanks :) | 08:36 |
| Unit193 | https://ubottu.com/ubottu.html#_editing_factoids in case you like the sed method, fwiw. | 08:36 |
| rbasak | I don't do it often enough. | 08:37 |
| rbasak | Unit193: is <reply> required here? Should I document that? | 08:37 |
| rbasak | I need to fix https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Checklist_after_a_DMB_election | 08:37 |
| Unit193 | Depends on how you want it to respond, it was there before. Try !+dmb-ping to see the literal factoid. | 08:45 |
| rbasak | OK, thanks | 08:47 |
| === gpiccoli_ is now known as gpiccoli | ||
| garga | Hey! I need to create a custom kernel based on focal hwe-5.13 adding one extra builtin item to support a new hardware and I'm failing to get it done. IS there any documentation with needed steps to get it done? | 11:30 |
| garga | I managed to create the new release and build it but I'm getting a "disagrees about version of symbol module_layout" error when I try to load modules. I already updated debian.netgate-5.13/abi/amd64/generic file with new ABI information but error persists | 11:32 |
| === ginggs_ is now known as ginggs | ||
| jawn-smith | packaging question: | 19:18 |
| jawn-smith | override_dh_auto_install: | 19:18 |
| jawn-smith | dh_auto_install | 19:18 |
| jawn-smith | does that have any effect? It seems to me like it wouldn't | 19:18 |
| seb129 | jawn-smith, should no, maybe there was another line and someone deleting it and didn't notice they could remove the section? | 19:29 |
| jawn-smith | seb129: that was my thought as well. I looked into a previous release and found exactly that. I was just trying to make sure I understood correctly | 19:35 |
| jawn-smith | thanks! | 19:35 |
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!