=== stgraber_ is now known as stgraber
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
[08:02] <rbasak> u-d-a@ moderation please
[08:33] <rbasak> !no dmb-ping is rbasak, sil2100, teward, bdmurray, kanashiro, seb128, utkarsh2102: DMB ping
[08:34] <utkarsh2102> \o
[08:34] <seb128> rbasak, yes?
[08:35] <seb128> ah, testing the updated list right?
[08:35] <Unit193> !no dmb-ping is <reply> bdmurray, kanashiro, rbasak, seb128, sil2100, teward, utkarsh2102: DMB ping
[08:35] <ubottu> I'll remember that, Unit193
[08:35] <rbasak> Just updating the list to add Utkarsh
[08:35] <Unit193> rbasak: Needs more sort.
[08:36] <rbasak> I didn't think the DMB members needed sorting?
[08:36] <rbasak> But sure, thanks :)
[08:36] <Unit193> https://ubottu.com/ubottu.html#_editing_factoids in case you like the sed method, fwiw.
[08:37] <rbasak> I don't do it often enough.
[08:37] <rbasak> Unit193: is <reply> required here? Should I document that?
[08:37] <rbasak> I need to fix https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Checklist_after_a_DMB_election
[08:45] <Unit193> Depends on how you want it to respond, it was there before.  Try !+dmb-ping to see the literal factoid.
[08:47] <rbasak> OK, thanks
=== gpiccoli_ is now known as gpiccoli
[11:30] <garga> Hey!  I need to create a custom kernel based on focal hwe-5.13 adding one extra builtin item to support a new hardware and I'm failing to get it done.  IS there any documentation with needed steps to get it done?
[11:32] <garga> I managed to create the new release and build it but I'm getting a "disagrees about version of symbol module_layout" error when I try to load modules.  I already updated debian.netgate-5.13/abi/amd64/generic file with new ABI information but error persists
=== ginggs_ is now known as ginggs
[19:18] <jawn-smith> packaging question:
[19:18] <jawn-smith> override_dh_auto_install:
[19:18] <jawn-smith>         dh_auto_install
[19:18] <jawn-smith> does that have any effect? It seems to me like it wouldn't
[19:29] <seb129> jawn-smith, should no, maybe there was another line and someone deleting it and didn't notice they could remove the section?
[19:35] <jawn-smith> seb129: that was my thought as well. I looked into a previous release and found exactly that. I was just trying to make sure I understood correctly
[19:35] <jawn-smith> thanks!
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie