[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-toolkit [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-toolkit [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-toolkit [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-toolkit [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-toolkit [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[01:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-toolkit [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[02:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.44.2-0ubuntu1]
[04:32] <RAOF> seb128: It's probably too early for you, but just in case - the xdg-desktop-portal SRU to Jammy has a confusing debian/changelog. It mentions updating `debian/patches/webextensions-portal.patch`, but the upload contains no such changes.
[04:34] <RAOF> It's also a *little* weird to use a `50 files changed, 6985 insertions(+), 5322 deletions(-)` diffstat to deliver a 10 line patch, but I can see the reasoning.
[05:02] <RAOF> For those playing at home, I've also posted a reply to https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/scope-of-gnome-mru/18041/39 in an attempt to get something finished there.
[05:02] <RAOF> (Before I noticed that it's on the agenda for the next SRU team meeting that I won't be waking up at 02:30 for)
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reprepro [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.1.1-1ubuntu18.04.1]
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nezha-boot0 (jammy-proposed/universe) [20220228+g0ad88bf-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 20220228+g0ad88bf-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg> has anybody any idea for this ghc failures? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/608541708/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-amd64.haskell-base-orphans_0.8.6-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg> fpic related
[10:39] <LocutusOfBorg> well, disabling lto works
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ do you think we should add all ghc packages to the lto-disabled list?
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-derive-builder [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.9.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-derive-builder [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-derive-builder [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-derive-builder [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-derive-builder [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-4] (no packageset)
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-derive-builder [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-4] (no packageset)
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openssl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.19]
[13:09] <sergiodj> ubuntu-archive: hi, could you please demote sssd-idp to universe?  it's a new binary package and it's been accepted into main, but it depends on libjose0 which is in universe
[13:20] <cjwatson> sergiodj: done
[13:20] <sergiodj> cjwatson: thanks
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-toolkit [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-toolkit [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-toolkit [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-derive-builder [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-4]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-derive-builder [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-4]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-derive-builder [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-4]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-toolkit [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-toolkit [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-derive-builder [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-4]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-toolkit [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.4000+dfsg-1]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-derive-builder [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-4]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-derive-builder [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-4]
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.3]
[14:13] <cpaelzer> vorlon: I was wondering about the right practise for avoiding a re-sync of adldap2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adldap2/+bug/1931315/comments/15
[14:13] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1931315 in adldap2 (Ubuntu) "Please drop php-laravel-framework (and movim and other associated components)" [Undecided, New]
[14:14] <cpaelzer> vorlon: if you are around later it would be nice if you could explain which way is right to do so (and why)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [1.187.32]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: dotnet6 (kinetic-proposed/primary) [6.0.106-0ubuntu1]
[15:09] <vorlon> cpaelzer: there is a blacklist for syncs, lp:~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/ it's unfortunately a bzr +junk branch so MPs are not possible; but when processing such bugs and the request is to keep it out of the archive, the AA should update the blacklist
[15:10] <vorlon> cpaelzer: also this should eventually move to git, it doesn't have to be an AA that drives this :)
[15:10] <vorlon> (and once moved to git, there's no +junk constraint anymore)
[15:11] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: lto-disabled> could this be handled in the ghc toolchain somehow instead of having to enumerate everything in the lto-disabled package?
[15:23] <cjwatson> +junk constraint> well sort of
[15:24] <cjwatson> You can do MPs between branches within an ~OWNER/+git/NAME repository, but that doesn't help all that much since only members of ~ubuntu-archive would normally be able to push branches in the first place
[15:24] <cjwatson> The better fix would be to move to a project, which could equally well be done with bzr
[15:26] <vorlon> oh, I didn't realize lp wouldn't let arbitrary users raise mps then, ok
[15:30] <paride> sil2100, hi!
[15:30] <sil2100> paride: hello o/
[15:30] <paride> sil2100, the iso images build failure are on your radar already?
[15:31] <paride> I saw some more strange failures, like https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/jammy/daily-live-20220618.log
[15:32] <paride> there the script didn't go ahead after the livefs builds, apparently?
[15:32] <sil2100> paride: well, this is something different
[15:32] <sil2100> paride: since the move of ancientminister, the cd-build-logs are not mirrored to the ubuntu-archive webserver
[15:33] <sil2100> That being said, I did see some failures, but didn't have time to take a look at those yet!
[15:35] <paride> sil2100, ok, thanks!
[15:35] <paride> let me know if there's anything I can help with
[15:57] <cjwatson> sil2100: have you raised that with IS yet as I suggested?
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, interestingly some packages are failing on armhf, some on amd64, some on s390x
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> should I disable it *everywhere*?
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> some packages are already in disabled-list
[16:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: armhf is not an LTO arch
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-settings-components [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-settings-components [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-settings-components [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3] (no packageset)
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-settings-components [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3] (no packageset)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-settings-components [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.0-3]
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-settings-components [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.0-3]
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-settings-components [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.0-3]
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-settings-components [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.0-3]
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hwloc [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.7.0-2ubuntu1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3-0ubuntu2]
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-keyring [source] (jammy-proposed) [40.0-3ubuntu3]
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-ui-extras [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.5-2] (no packageset)
[18:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.1]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (impish-proposed) [4.4.1-2.3ubuntu1.1]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5.20.04.3]
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (jammy-proposed/main) [2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5 => 2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:48] <jbicha> nageru 2.1.0-2ubuntu2 landed in kinetic release but without the ppc64el binaries https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nageru/+publishinghistory
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqb (jammy-proposed/main) [2.0.4-1build1 => 2.0.4-1ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[19:48] <jbicha> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/ppc64el/nageru
[20:21] <tsimonq2> jbicha: I can't confirm that.
[20:22] <tsimonq2> Version: 2.1.0-2ubuntu2 is from http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/kinetic/universe/binary-ppc64el/Packages.xz and the binaries are published, furthermore: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nageru/2.1.0-2ubuntu2/+build/24103697
[20:23] <jbicha> tsimonq2: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/madison.cgi?package=nageru
[20:24] <sarnold> is that service known to work after lillypilly was turned off?
[20:25] <cjwatson> people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive has been a proxy for a long time - it only involved lillypilly's apache to proxy to snakefruit
[20:25] <cjwatson> so should be fine
[20:26] <tsimonq2> Why would that tool show it in that manner but the archive metadata says otherwise? Perhaps ppc64el published last and that's when the cache was last refreshed?
[20:26] <tsimonq2> I mean, I can try in a porterbox unless someone else would like to...
[20:27] <sarnold> cjwatson: aha, thanks
[20:27] <jbicha> tsimonq2: your Packages link shows that nageru is still at the older version number for ppc64el
[20:28] <jbicha> or you can compare https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/ppc64el/nageru with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/amd64/nageru
[20:29] <tsimonq2> So Launchpad is out of date... still seeing it in the raw Packages file as 2.1.0-2ubuntu2 not 2.1.0-1ubuntu2
[20:31] <cjwatson> Launchpad can't be out of date, that's not a thing
[20:31] <tsimonq2> Then the real question is... what broke :)
[20:31]  * tsimonq2 looks at Britney logs
[20:31] <cjwatson> And jbicha is right, the Packages file you quoted says -1ubuntu2 _not_ -2ubuntu2
[20:32] <tsimonq2> wait no we're looking at different lines...
[20:32] <cjwatson> I'm not sure what happened, probably some horrible fiddly race somewhere; I've just run "copy-package --from ubuntu --from-suite kinetic --to-suite kinetic-proposed -b nageru" to copy it back to kinetic-proposed which should I hope cause proposed-migration to sort it out
[20:32] <tsimonq2> The source is that old version, yeah
[20:32] <tsimonq2> take a peek at that binary
[20:32] <cjwatson> I know what I'm doing!
[20:32] <cjwatson> $ curl -s http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/kinetic/universe/binary-ppc64el/Packages.xz | xzcat | grep-dctrl -PX nageru
[20:32] <cjwatson> Package: nageru
[20:32] <cjwatson> Architecture: ppc64el
[20:32] <cjwatson> Version: 2.1.0-1ubuntu2
[20:33] <tsimonq2> futatabi is the binary built from that though
[20:33] <tsimonq2> I apologize if I'm coming across as brash, btw - not my intent :)
[20:34] <tsimonq2> so half of the binaries migrated -very likely what you said about something being racey
[20:34] <cjwatson> oh!  nageru apparently stopped building the "nageru" binary _just_ on ppc64el
[20:34] <cjwatson> other architectures have it
[20:35] <cjwatson> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1326551/accepted-nageru-210-2-source-into-unstable/
[20:35] <tsimonq2> ahh there we are :)
[20:36] <cjwatson> and it shows up on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html, sort it
[20:36] <cjwatson> *sort of
[20:36] <cjwatson> I'm sure there used to be a report which showed this sort of architecture-specific mismatch
[20:38] <cjwatson> anyway, no reverse-depends and the intent is clear enough there, so I've removed that binary now
[20:38] <cjwatson> that should clear it out of the NBS report in a bit
[20:39] <jbicha> thank you! yeah, the nbs report was where I saw the issue
[20:39] <cjwatson> sorry for taking a little while to spot that ...
[20:41] <cjwatson> (also the above was a bit snippy of me, sorry)
[20:47] <tsimonq2> thanks for your help :)
[21:42] <vorlon> cjwatson: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/kinetic_outdate.txt search for nageru :)
[21:43] <vorlon> (it's a little bit noisy right now because of NBS, but eventually it all settles out...)
[21:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (jammy-proposed/main) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.2 => 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.3-3ubuntu0.8 => 2.2.3-3ubuntu0.9] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[22:07] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: your vtk9 sync over your own previous change now makes the opencv build-deps uninstallable (libtbb-dev vs libtbb2-dev)
[22:08] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: was that intentional, or should I re-add the delta?  opencv got built on most archs against the previous vtk9 but amd64 is stuck
[22:13] <cjwatson> vorlon: aha right, I was looking for `testing/` which I think is where it used to be, thanks
[22:45] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I think Debian is moving away from libtbb2-dev
[22:45] <LocutusOfBorg> opencv will probably get an RC bug soon there
[22:50] <LocutusOfBorg> let me revert what else has delta
[23:00] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I might have fixed opencv
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: device-tree-compiler [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2] (core)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eclib [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220621-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-test-interface-files [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: device-tree-compiler [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2] (core)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-workalendar [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [16.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-invopop-yaml [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: workflow [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: device-tree-compiler [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2] (core)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cloup [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: device-tree-compiler [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2] (core)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eclib [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220621-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: device-tree-compiler [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2] (core)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjph [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: workflow [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eclib [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220621-1] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eclib [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220621-1] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjph [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: workflow [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eclib [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220621-1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjph [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: workflow [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjph [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: workflow [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)