[14:59] <jawn-smith> o/
[14:59] <dbungert> o/
[15:00] <bdrung> \o
[15:00] <slyon> o/
[15:00] <schopin> o/
[15:00] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <sil2100> \o
[15:00] <juliank> o/ (meet tbd)
[15:00]  * sil2100 (still in a meeting)
[15:01] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:01] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:01:02 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:01] <ginggs> o/
[15:01] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:01] <jawn-smith> #topic Lightning Round
[15:01] <jawn-smith> The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundation-team-updates-thursday-23-june-2022/28994
[15:01] <jawn-smith> Let's take our usual time to read and ask questions
[15:02] <jawn-smith> sil2100: Your status isn't long enough! You forgot that you reviewed some other PRs
[15:03] <mclemenceau> o/
[15:03] <jawn-smith> Should paride join these meetings?
[15:03] <bdmurray> He is in a server meeting now
[15:05] <sil2100> jawn-smith: uh oh! I blame that on writing this during meetings!
[15:05] <slyon> waveform: have there already been some preliminary results from your sd-oomd testing?
[15:05] <sil2100> ;)
[15:06] <slyon> (other than what was posted on the mailinglist)
[15:06] <waveform> slyon, not yet -- unfortunately my desktop has been bouncing between my "usual" desktop (on an SSD) and SD cards all week as part of the ff optimization work
[15:06] <slyon> ok. I guess it would be best to update the LP bug report whenever you get some additional results. TIA
[15:06] <enr0n> slyon: I have also been running with ManagedOOMSwap=auto on `-.slice`, and it has been a better experience so far.
[15:07] <waveform> will do
[15:07] <paride> bdmurray, actually server team meeting is in +25m from now, I confused it with cloud-init standup (too many of those!)
[15:07] <paride> bdmurray, so I'm around
[15:08] <jawn-smith> Okay, any other questions?
[15:08] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:09] <jawn-smith> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:09] <jawn-smith> Just one
[15:09] <sil2100> ...shit, I did forget quite a lot from my status, so updating it now still
[15:09] <jawn-smith> bug 1978487
[15:09] <ubottu> Bug 1978487 in apport (Ubuntu) "attach_journal_errors is causing a ValueError crash" [Medium, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978487
[15:09] <sil2100> ;)
[15:09] <bdrung> Already fixed upstream, the upload to kinetic will follow shortly
[15:10] <jawn-smith> Okay great. If work is being done on it then it deserves a card
[15:10] <sil2100> \o/
[15:10] <jawn-smith> bdrung: does it already have one?
[15:10] <bdrung> no. not this apport bug.
[15:11] <bdmurray> sil2100: I guess that's an advantage to discourse - the ability to continue editing!
[15:11] <slyon> it's tagged fr-2483...
[15:11] <jawn-smith> Indeed it is
[15:11] <bdrung> ups
[15:11] <jawn-smith> excellent, let's just remove the rls-kk tag then
[15:12] <jawn-smith> I'll do that real quick
[15:12] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:12] <jawn-smith> bug 1970402
[15:12] <ubottu> Bug 1970402 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "Initrd out of memory error after upgrade to 22.04" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1970402
[15:13] <bdmurray> remove the tag and target it to kineitc
[15:13] <bdmurray> which I'm doing
[15:13] <jawn-smith> Thanks!
[15:13] <jawn-smith> bug 1978125
[15:13] <ubottu> Bug 1978125 in apt (Ubuntu) "apt ignoring pin/block/hold files in preferences.d for snapd" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978125
[15:13] <jawn-smith> This was discussed last week, but we wanted to hear juliank's opinion on it
[15:13] <jawn-smith> before carding it
[15:13] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: that isn't snapd specific is it?
[15:14] <juliank> ah yes I need to fix that too, I should touch that with the other thing
[15:14] <sil2100> Let's card it then
[15:14] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: that was my understanding, yes
[15:14] <jawn-smith> so mclemenceau would you mind carding that one?
[15:15] <mclemenceau> sure no problem
[15:15] <jawn-smith> thanks!
[15:15] <jawn-smith> rls-ii is empty
[15:15] <jawn-smith> so is rls-ff
[15:16] <slyon> I feel like we should also card #1970402
[15:16] <jawn-smith> oh we had a miscommunication
[15:16] <bdmurray> I agree
[15:16] <jawn-smith> let's go back to discussing bug 1970402
[15:16] <ubottu> Bug 1970402 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "Initrd out of memory error after upgrade to 22.04" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1970402
[15:17] <slyon> This feels relevant for 22.04.1 so I think we should card it
[15:17] <bdmurray> Do we have an idea of how to recreate it?
[15:17] <juliank> initrd out of memory is that a dup?
[15:18] <juliank> Same as LP: #1842320
[15:18] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1842320 in OEM Priority Project "Out of Memory on boot with 5.2.0 kernel" [Critical, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1842320
[15:18] <juliank> ?
[15:19] <bdmurray> so come to find out it is carded but not targetted to Jammy
[15:19] <jawn-smith> So shall we card it jammy and mark 1970402 as a duplicate?
[15:20] <juliank> do that
[15:20] <jawn-smith> err, I mean "target it to jammy"
[15:20] <jawn-smith> Who is investigating it?
[15:20] <jawn-smith> Sounds like someone on the OEM team
[15:20] <jawn-smith> schopin: you mentioned another bug you wanted to discuss
[15:20] <schopin> I also have LP: #1979639 for Jammy which was intended to show up on the report
[15:20] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1979639 in nodejs (Ubuntu Kinetic) "openssl 3.0.3-7 needs port from sid to jammy" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979639
[15:21] <slyon> I targeted it to Jammy and updated the labels on the initrd bug
[15:21] <jawn-smith> slyon: thanks!
[15:22] <schopin> so, that's a regression affecting any user of libssl1.1 on a Jammy system (due to recent changes to the default config file)
[15:23] <schopin> IMHO should be carded and selected for dev, as it not only affects packages outside of the archive, but also nodejs due to our embedded libssl1.1 there.
[15:24] <jawn-smith> So the work for this is done in kinetic
[15:24] <jawn-smith> But needs an SRU for jammy
[15:25] <jawn-smith> vorlon: opinions on fixing openssl vs fixing nodejs in jammy?
[15:25] <vorlon> oh no
[15:25] <vorlon> reading quickly
[15:26] <schopin> note that Debian has patched this because I think they still have some libssl1.1 rdeps in unstable
[15:27] <vorlon> one argument is that if we are ever going to have empty etc in Ubuntu Core, openssl should have sensible defaults that don't depend on contents of /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
[15:27] <vorlon> (though perhaps the openssl package is not in Core)
[15:27] <vorlon> (it is)
[15:28] <vorlon> so that's an argument for fixing this in libssl3
[15:28] <schopin> I'm fairly sure libssl does not *depend* on the /etc config and can happily live without.
[15:28] <vorlon> right; it's only the openssl package which ships it
[15:28] <vorlon> of course the standard way of fixing that for empty-etc would be to ship the defaults under /usr and change the code to look there
[15:29] <vorlon> which would solve the problem for libssl1.1 in jammy but is also not a particularly SRUable change
[15:30] <vorlon> from reading the bug it's not clear to me what the bits are that are incompatible with libssl1.1, can that be laid out explicitly?
[15:31] <vorlon> the Debian bug mentions 'providers'
[15:31] <schopin> yeah, the notion of providers is new to 3.0
[15:31] <vorlon> and the in-library defaults should be sane there I think?
[15:31] <schopin> Yes they are the same as what's in the config file.
[15:32] <vorlon> opinions about libraries that choke on unknown fields in an .ini style config file notwithstanding, it seems appropriate to comment them out by default in the config file in an SRU of the openssl package
[15:33] <schopin> Alright, will do :)
[15:34] <schopin> mclemenceau: could you card this?
[15:34] <bdrung> but if you only patch openssl, then users can run into this bug when changing their openssl configuration
[15:35] <vorlon> bdrung: so you're arguing to patch both nodejs's libssl1.1 and openssl?
[15:35] <bdrung> yes, that would be the cleanest solution
[15:35] <vorlon> I think patching openssl is the priority.  I wouldn't say no to an SRU for nodejs also
[15:35] <schopin> they'll still get bit if they have another libssl1.1 hanging around anyway.
[15:35] <vorlon> ^ exactly
[15:35] <mclemenceau> thx schopin , done!
[15:36] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:36] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:36] <jawn-smith> vorlon:
[15:36] <vorlon> this should be quick and easy, a short list
[15:36] <vorlon> ubuntu-meta is with the desktop team
[15:37] <vorlon> python3-stdlib-extensions is not built on i386 because it's dep-wait on python3.11 which doko is presumably still working on since the new build failure is a symbols file mismatch which is what his last upload purported to fix
[15:37] <xypron> o/ greetings from Nürnberg were I visited the Embedded World fair
[15:37] <vorlon> vim is with jawn-smith
[15:37]  * vorlon waves to xypron 
[15:37] <jawn-smith> Yes. I have it building, but autopkgtests still need work
[15:37] <vorlon> binutils vs gcc-12 is an autopkgtest regression.  doko I assume you will follow this through also
[15:37] <doko> yep, I have a work-around now. that's on me
[15:37] <vorlon> and usb-creator is the in-progress MIR, with excuses bugs linked in the report
[15:37] <doko> yes, analyzed, and fix pending
[15:38] <vorlon> so that's everything for right now
[15:38] <slyon> I can take care of ubs-creator, to sponsor things that are needed to get the MIR moving
[15:38] <jawn-smith> Thanks everyone for keeping that list nice and short
[15:38] <vorlon> no new tasks to assign, everybody go pick something off of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html to fix instead ;)
[15:38] <doko> please have a look at the gcc-12 build regressions
[15:38] <vorlon> ^ that too!
[15:39] <slyon> https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220617-kinetic-kinetic.html
[15:40] <jawn-smith> vorlon: do we want to hand out some of those packages in the FTBFS report?
[15:40] <vorlon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220617-kinetic-kinetic.html#foundations-bugs-team
[15:41] <vorlon> there's 10 packages here, so sure
[15:42] <ginggs> i think those are all retrying right now
[15:42] <vorlon> oh
[15:42] <vorlon> ok then let's not do any assignments here
[15:42] <doko> the gcc issues, for me
[15:44] <vorlon> jawn-smith: back to you
[15:44] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[15:44] <jawn-smith> any holidays coming up?
[15:45] <sil2100> Not for me o/
[15:45] <enr0n> I am out tomorrow (swapped this past Monday's US holiday)
[15:47] <bdmurray> Paride and I posted our status last week on Friday-ish but we'll switch to Thursday so the Foundations status can link to the Ubuntu QA one
[15:51] <bdmurray> I think that's it jawn-smith
[15:51] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[15:51] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:51:36 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-06-23-15.01.moin.txt