[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: device-tree-compiler [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.6.1-2] (core)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eclib [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220621-1] (no packageset)
[03:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjph [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[03:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: workflow [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[03:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (impish-backports/universe) [264-1~bpo21.10.1 => 271-1~bpo21.10.1] (no packageset)
[03:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-backports/universe) [264-1 => 271-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (impish-backports) [271-1~bpo21.10.1]
[04:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [271-1~bpo22.04.1]
[05:12] <cpaelzer> vorlon: I knew about lp:~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/ already (as I said in the bug update that I had linked), my question was about using sync-blacklist.txt or extra-removals.txt in this case
[05:13] <cpaelzer> vorlon: I thought the latter would be appropriate and had linked an example change, but being unfamiliar with the mechanism I wanted to get an ack beofre pushing that
[05:14] <cpaelzer> vorlon: This is the proposed change (since one can't do real MRs) that I had linked https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~paelzer/+junk/sync-blacklist-adldap2-1931315/revision/906
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted device-tree-compiler [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-2]
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted device-tree-compiler [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-2]
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted device-tree-compiler [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-2]
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted device-tree-compiler [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-2]
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted device-tree-compiler [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-2]
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted device-tree-compiler [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.1-2]
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-test-interface-files [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cloup [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.15.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.18-2] (no packageset)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.18 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04]
[08:03] <sil2100> jibel: hey! Looking at golang-1.18 in focal NEW - accepted, but we need to make sure .3 is in jammy as well (right now it's on .1), as per my comment in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.18/+bug/1977860/comments/2
[08:03] <sil2100> didrocks: ^
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.18 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.18 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset)
[08:16] <tjaalton> sil2100: hey, about 20.04.5; mesa 22.0.x in jammy dropped some old drivers, which are now provided by a forked mesa-amber based on 21.3.7. so we could either skip the userspace hwe backports, or backport both mesa and mesa-amber. WDYT?
[08:17] <tjaalton> also, I don't think backporting the new xorg-server makes sense
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.18 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset)
[08:28] <sil2100> tjaalton: so to make sure we don't regress existing users, we'd have to make sure mesa-amber is pulled in with the new mesa in focal, right
[08:28] <sil2100> ?
[08:29] <sil2100> tjaalton: is there a lot of goodness in the mesa from jammy compared to what we have in focal?
[08:29] <seb128> RAOF, I replied to your question on bug #1975638, let me know if you want me to reupload without that changelog entry
[08:30] <sil2100> tjaalton: since as it's the final point-release for focal, I'd like users to get the latest of the latest, since there will be no other HWE stack updates of this scale. But if it doesn't give users too much merit, then it would be just a waste of effort
[08:33] <tjaalton> sil2100: right. vulkan 1.3 support is probably the biggest new thing there
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nezha-boot0 [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220228+g0ad88bf-0ubuntu2~22.04.1]
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools-signed (impish-proposed/main) [2.17.0-0ubuntu2.1 => 2.17.0-0ubuntu2.2] (core)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (impish-proposed/main) [2.17.0-0ubuntu2.1 => 2.17.0-0ubuntu2.2] (core)
[08:38] <tjaalton> sil2100: ok I'll prep both for focal then, thanks!
[08:40] <tjaalton> and 20.0.5 point release for jammy
[08:40] <tjaalton> err. 22.0.5
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools-signed (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.5 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.6] (core)
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.5 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.6] (core)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.18 [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.18 [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset)
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.764.1]
[08:50] <schopin> sil2100: if you have the time today could you have a look at the various s390-tools(-signed) packages in the SRU queues for focal, impish and jammy? The Jammy one is relatively big, but impish and focal should be relatively painless.
[08:50] <sil2100> schopin: will do o/
[08:50] <schopin> Many thanks :)
[08:51] <schopin> fheimes: ^
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot-nezha [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022.04+git20220405.7446a472-0ubuntu0.1]
[09:25] <sil2100> schopin, fheimes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1971959/comments/4 <- as per my comment, this bug is missing a test case
[09:25] <sil2100> Would need someone to tweak it so that it's verifiable
[09:26] <sil2100> schopin, fheimes: same for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1978323 plz
[09:27] <sil2100> I see there is like a testcase in the description, but I need to be sure it's the steps that need to be performed for verification
[09:36] <schopin> ACK
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: toil [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.6.0-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.0-0ubuntu3.1]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools-signed [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.0-0ubuntu3.1]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.18 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.18 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.18 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.18 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.18 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.18.3-1ubuntu1~20.04]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [20220621-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [20220621-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [20220621-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-invopop-yaml [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [20220621-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [20220621-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [20220621-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-ui-extras [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-2]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjph [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjph [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openturns [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.18-2]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cloup [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.15.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-test-interface-files [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted workflow [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted workflow [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjph [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjph [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-workalendar [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [16.3.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted workflow [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted workflow [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.25+dfsg1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cloup [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.14.0-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted workflow [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjph [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted workflow [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.1-1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ros2-test-interface-files [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.10.0-2]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [2.20.0-0ubuntu3.1 => 2.20.0-0ubuntu3.1] (core)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.20.0-0ubuntu3.1]
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (bionic-proposed/main) [1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.6 => 1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.7] (core)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.6.7-1ubuntu2.3 => 1:1.6.7-1ubuntu2.4] (core)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdump-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [1:1.6.10ubuntu1 => 1:1.6.10ubuntu2] (core)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdump-tools (impish-proposed/main) [1:1.6.9ubuntu1 => 1:1.6.9ubuntu1.1] (core)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: dotnet6 (kinetic-proposed/primary) [6.0.106-0ubuntu1]
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dotnet6 [source] (kinetic-proposed) [6.0.106-0ubuntu1]
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-rosidl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-rosidl [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-rosidl [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-rosidl [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gocc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20211213.7ea6993-1] (no packageset)
[17:41] <Eickmeyer> Hi all! lsp-plugins will not build for armhf (nor any 32-bit arch). I've excluded it as an arch in d/control so Britney probably needs to be hinted (?) as such. I've made Debian aware in a bug report, but it doesn't look like they really care, so I'm back to maintaining it, I guess.
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ros2-rosidl [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[19:52] <kanashiro> I got an email to ubuntu-release mailing list stuck in moderation, could anyone please accept it?
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fabric-manager-515 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [515.48.07-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnvidia-nscq-515 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [515.48.07-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [515.48.07-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [515.48.07-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.3-1ubuntu3 => 2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/multiverse) [515.48.07-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/multiverse) [515.48.07-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:34] <sergiodj> ginggs: hey, is there a PPA with gcc 12 that I can use as a dependency to test a fix for an FTBFS?
[21:35] <sergiodj> ah, I think I found it: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/volatile/+packages
[21:38] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Did anybody see my message above RE: lsp-plugins? Should be rather trivial.
[23:08] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: what determines that it doesn't build on 32-bit archs?  The upload history goes straight from the version I uploaded to fix the armhf build, to a version which drops armhf from the arch list
[23:08] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: the armhf beginning in 1.2.0 completely ftbfs.
[23:08] <Eickmeyer> Upstream doesn't care.
[23:09] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: it failed to build in 1.1.31 and it was trivial to fix
[23:09] <Eickmeyer> How did you fix? Debian didn't seem to know how.
[23:10] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: er did you look at the existing packaging in Ubuntu before uploading a new version?  the patch is there
[23:10] <Eickmeyer> I'm downloading the source right now.
[23:11] <Eickmeyer> I went from the Debian source.
[23:11] <vorlon> how's that exactly? Debian doesn't have 1.2, it only has 1.1.31
[23:12] <Eickmeyer> I upgraded based on their source and added the bits required to make 1.2 build, sans armhf.
[23:13] <Eickmeyer> I see your patch, I'll see if it can apply to 1.2
[23:17] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Yeah, the code changed significantly enough that the patch doesn't apply anymore.
[23:17] <Eickmeyer> I'll see if I can find if the code simply moved.
[23:20] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, nothing.
[23:28] <Eickmeyer> Ok, found where it is, but I'll have to redo the patch. Thanks for the pointer, vorlon. :)
[23:29] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ok.  my earlier patch wasn't about 32-bit support at all, it was an armhf-specific fix that was needed.  was there something else that made you think 32-bit in general was unsupported?
[23:31] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Nevermind, misread the github. I thought I saw i586 as N but it's an F. My memory just recalled incorrectly.
[23:31] <vorlon> ok
[23:32] <Eickmeyer> They list armv7 as experimental. I'll apply your findings and upload with a patch equivalent to what you made before.
[23:38] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: the code would build just fine if they were just not trying to pass a bunch of -m flags to the compiler to override the defaults
[23:38] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Yeah, no clue why they're trying to do that.
[23:39] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: They seem to be primarily developing for Arch Linux.
[23:39] <vorlon> because they're trying to be clever and make their build system give users targeted options
[23:40] <Eickmeyer> Actually, yes, that would explain a lot.
[23:44] <vorlon> fwiw I've tried a test build here and this seems harder to fix than before
[23:44] <vorlon> previous error: cc1plus: error: ‘-mfloat-abi=hard’: selected architecture lacks an FPU
[23:44] <vorlon> new error: /var/tmp/ccXx5zkQ.s:58: Error: thumb conditional instruction should be in IT block -- `clzne r2,r2'
[23:45] <vorlon> so yeah, for now I'll remove the old binaries
[23:46] <Eickmeyer> Ok, that works.
[23:46] <Eickmeyer> I won't bother with the patch then.