[12:27] so https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1979917 is tagge [12:27] Launchpad bug 1979917 in nginx (Ubuntu) "libnginx-mod-http-fancyindex is using outdated version with missing html escaping" [Medium, New] [12:27] marked as security bug. should we do a security upload patch or just SRU? [12:27] also i hate typing on phones >.< [12:29] teward: hmm in general we prefer to suggest in these cases to get CVEs assigned then we can just follow the usual process (which I see you have already done) - but an SRU would also be okay (although it wouldn't end up in the security pocket without special attention) [12:30] amurray: i havent gone the cve issuance route nor checked if one was issued [12:30] i have enough to do without breaking my back with MITRE rules :P [12:31] teward: oh I thought I had seen you ask them if a CVE had been assigned... perhaps I was thinking of some other bug (I wasn't suggesting that you go through that process, more that we suggest to the reported to go and do that) [12:31] given fancy_index is not included in the main nginx-core and only default-ships in universe nginx-extras i'm not tooooooo concerned. yet :P [12:33] ahh ok - I always get confused about packages which have different binaries split across main vs universe [12:36] yep [12:36] amurray: re: nginx thats a question you can always poke me on :P [20:29] sbeattie: hi, I'm doing an nfs-utils merge for kinetic, and while going over bugs I could perhaps close with the update I found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1918312 [20:29] Launchpad bug 1918312 in nfs-utils (Ubuntu) "group changes don't show up in kerberizedd mounts" [Undecided, Confirmed] [20:29] I think that is something that should be fixed upstream [20:30] if you agree, maybe could you add a comment asking the reporter to try to revive the upstream thread?