| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (jammy-proposed/main) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 03:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fenicsx-performance-tests [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fenicsx-performance-tests [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fenicsx-performance-tests [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fenicsx-performance-tests [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fenicsx-performance-tests [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fenicsx-performance-tests [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.4.0-1] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fenicsx-performance-tests [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.4.0-1] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fenicsx-performance-tests [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.4.0-1] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fenicsx-performance-tests [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.4.0-1] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fenicsx-performance-tests [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.4.0-1] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.3 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 08:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (jammy-proposed) [249.11-0ubuntu3.4] | 09:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xlnx-default-bitstreams (jammy-proposed/primary) [2022.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 09:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xlnx-default-bitstreams [source] (jammy-proposed) [2022.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 09:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xlnx-default-bitstreams [arm64] (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [2022.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) | 09:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xlnx-default-bitstreams [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2022.1-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 09:49 | |
| === Mirv__ is now known as Mirv | ||
| ricotz | hello, please re-try the failed archs of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-14/1:14.0.6-1 | 10:07 |
|---|---|---|
| seb128 | ricotz, retried | 10:14 |
| ricotz | seb128, thanks | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ricotz, why should i386 succeed now? | 10:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I ask because in Debian i386 is failing the same way | 10:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-14 | 10:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so if something got fixed in toolchain, please let me know and I can retry | 10:39 |
| ricotz | LocutusOfBorg, hi, I see, I assumed it got stuck by some race caused by the stressed builders farm | 10:44 |
| ricotz | LocutusOfBorg, looks like the builders are still quite grumpy today :( | 10:46 |
| ricotz | LocutusOfBorg, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-14/1:14.0.6-1/+build/24112253 | 11:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mdh | 11:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng (jammy-proposed/main) [43-2 => 43-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:59 | |
| paride | bdmurray, hey, https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/auto-upgrade-testing-specifications/set-debian-frontend/+merge/425732 should fix the remaining flavor upgrade tests | 14:04 |
| jbicha | bdmurray: good morning, please review gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng/jammy since it's urgent for OEM | 14:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brltty (jammy-proposed/main) [6.4-4ubuntu2 => 6.4-4ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng [source] (jammy-proposed) [43-2ubuntu1] | 15:51 | |
| bdmurray | jbicha: approved / accepted | 15:54 |
| ricotz | LocutusOfBorg, :( https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-14/1:14.0.6-1/+build/24112253 | 16:41 |
| ricotz | bdmurray, hi :), could you restart llvm ? ^ | 17:05 |
| bdmurray | ricotz: yes, given that there is no build log | 17:06 |
| ricotz | thx | 17:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (impish-proposed/main) [1:21.10.9 => 1:21.10.10] (core) | 18:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdigidoc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdigidoc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdigidoc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdigidoc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdigidoc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdigidoc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:21 | |
| Eickmeyer | Could I get a rebuild of the ubuntustudio kinetic image? The test tracker won't let me due to a previous failure. | 21:39 |
| Eickmeyer | Unless there's another method I don't know about. | 21:41 |
| tsimonq2 | <Eickmeyer> "Could I get a rebuild of the..." <- That's something to get fixed... | 22:14 |
| tsimonq2 | Wdym by "previous failure"? | 22:15 |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: I had earlier used the same tool to request a rebuild. That rebuild failed, resulting in the same button being "stuck" and unable to request anotehr rebuild. | 22:15 |
| tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: How sure are you that it isn't just iso.q.u.c showing it as stuck while it's still building? Do you know how to check your livefs builds? | 22:17 |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: I'm very familiar: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntustudio/ | 22:18 |
| Eickmeyer | It's been stuck like that for days now. | 22:18 |
| tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: So the QA tracker won't let you rebuild? What errors are you getting? | 22:18 |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: It doesn't give me an error, it just doesn't do anything at this point. It noops. | 22:19 |
| tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: It's a cronjob on the backend unless something has changed in the last 5 years or so... it simply won't work even after a few hours? | 22:21 |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: Not if 1) my rebuild request fails to build, and 2) each subsequent build fails to build. | 22:21 |
| * tsimonq2 wonders if someone with SSH access can pull some logs | 22:22 | |
| Eickmeyer | Usually someone with ssh access can easily just activate a rebuild and if everything goes right it's all OK. But, honestly, being unable to request a rebuild myself is rather inconvenient for everyone if a rebuild request fails. | 22:23 |
| tsimonq2 | I agree. I'm willing to throw a patch at some code if the log catching is thorough :) | 22:24 |
| === mfo_ is now known as mfo | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!