[08:08] <EduGomezE> Hi, I'm working on ubuntu-bug to change where the bugs are uploaded when reported from Windows Subsystem for Linux. Since Ubuntu WSL is hosted on Github, we were thinking about reporting the bugs as Github Issues.
[08:10] <EduGomezE> I was wondering if anyone has done something similar, it seems easy enough to implement with Github's API but I want to make sure I'm not reinventing the wheel before starting.
[08:11] <schopin> ubuntu-bug is apport, isn't it?
[08:11] <EduGomezE> yes
[08:12] <schopin> bdrung: bdmurray ^
[08:20] <seb128> EduGomezE, for other projects we registered also an upstream project on launchpad and report there rather than github, which is suboptimal but apport collecting for depends/versions/env etc is launchpad specific today, we would need a github backend
[08:22] <EduGomezE> Ok, my idea was to implement that backend, I was just making sure no one else had done it already
[08:32] <seb128> EduGomezE, you probably want to wait for bdmurray or bdrung for that yes
[08:33] <EduGomezE> Ok, thanks!
[12:29] <enr0n> Can a core dev please trigger the PPA autopkgtests listed here? https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/jzTjnMwX2H/
[12:35] <kanashiro> enr0n, done
[12:36] <enr0n> kanashiro: thanks!
[18:05] <jawn-smith> Is it normal for it to take a couple of hours to publish binaries for a package after it finishes building?
[18:07] <cjwatson> jawn-smith: no, which package?
[18:08] <cjwatson> (though it can happen in normal-ish circumstances if there's a large backlog for some reason)
[18:09] <cjwatson> I don't see any obvious blockages at the moment
[18:23] <jawn-smith> cjwatson: golang-github-masterminds-sprig
[20:21] <cjwatson> jawn-smith: it's in NEW
[20:21] <cjwatson> needs manual review
[20:22] <jawn-smith> ah of course, sorry to trouble you!
[20:23] <jawn-smith> I thought it wouldn't have attempted building until it had been reviewed