| schopin | o/ | 14:58 |
|---|---|---|
| ginggs | o/ | 14:58 |
| jawn-smith | o/ | 14:59 |
| dbungert | o/ | 14:59 |
| slyon | o/ | 14:59 |
| jawn-smith | o===|==========> | 14:59 |
| bdrung | \o | 14:59 |
| jawn-smith | oops, didn't leave my sword by the door | 14:59 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 15:00 |
| jawn-smith | #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team | 15:00 |
| meetingology | Meeting started at 15:00:41 UTC. The chair is jawn-smith. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | 15:00 |
| ogayot | o/ | 15:00 |
| juliank | o/ | 15:00 |
| meetingology | Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | 15:00 |
| jawn-smith | #topic Lightning Round | 15:00 |
| jawn-smith | The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundation-team-updates-thursday-30-june-2022/29123/10 | 15:01 |
| jawn-smith | Let's all take a few minutes to read and ask questions | 15:01 |
| jawn-smith | sil2100: It says you reviewed the --until/--thru PR | 15:01 |
| jawn-smith | should I merge it? | 15:01 |
| sil2100 | Aaaah, didn't press the button | 15:02 |
| ginggs | jawn-smith: i saw your libdigidoc fix, that package is orphaned in debian (QA maintained). if you're interested in getting an upload into debian, i'd be happy to sponsor | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | jawn-smith: done now o/ | 15:02 |
| jawn-smith | ginggs, sil2100 thanks! I did submittodebian the patch I created | 15:03 |
| schopin | libdigidoc? Isn't that obsoleted upstream too? | 15:03 |
| jawn-smith | should it be removed from Debian/Ubuntu then? | 15:03 |
| schopin | I'd be all for it, but that's mostly because I get spammed any time someone clicks the rebuild button on LP as I'm TIL | 15:04 |
| jawn-smith | well, now I'm TIL :) | 15:04 |
| schopin | \o/ | 15:04 |
| jawn-smith | No reverse dependencies... | 15:05 |
| mclemenceau | o/ | 15:05 |
| jawn-smith | Okay I'll investigate filing a removal bug as part of my +1 shift this week | 15:05 |
| schopin | Have a look at my initial RM bug, there should be some pointers there. | 15:06 |
| ginggs | libdigidoc-tools might still be useful | 15:06 |
| jawn-smith | I'll have a look this afternoon | 15:07 |
| jawn-smith | and ping ginggs if we decide it should stay, then we can remove the diff from Debian | 15:07 |
| jawn-smith | Any other questions? | 15:07 |
| slyon | enr0n: I didn't receive this oomd email, is it stuck in moderation? | 15:08 |
| enr0n | slyon: oof, possibly, let me check the list archive | 15:08 |
| enr0n | This one I think: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-June/042159.html | 15:09 |
| jawn-smith | The missing email has been found | 15:10 |
| slyon | thx, it went through after all :) | 15:10 |
| jawn-smith | Any other questions? | 15:10 |
| jawn-smith | #topic Release incoming bugs | 15:11 |
| jawn-smith | #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 15:11 |
| jawn-smith | bug 1980348 | 15:11 |
| ubottu | Bug 1980348 in gcc-12 (Ubuntu) "gcc ftbfs in kinetic (crypt.h not found in 32bit libsanitizer build)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980348 | 15:11 |
| jawn-smith | gcc is kinda important | 15:12 |
| doko | I figured that out an hour ago | 15:12 |
| doko | just closing | 15:12 |
| jawn-smith | oh excellent | 15:12 |
| jawn-smith | Thanks! | 15:12 |
| jawn-smith | Are you closing for both gcc-10 and gcc-12? | 15:12 |
| jawn-smith | Sounds like it's still building for both, so we'll discuss it next week if it comes back | 15:14 |
| jawn-smith | bug 1980195 | 15:14 |
| ubottu | Bug 1980195 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu desktop (canary) ISO & apport-collect, ubuntu-bug fail to run" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980195 | 15:14 |
| jawn-smith | Looks like a potential dependency/import issue? | 15:14 |
| jawn-smith | bdrung: Do you have an opinion? | 15:14 |
| bdrung | jawn-smith, that was a regression in apport, but already fixed with the latest kinetic version | 15:15 |
| jawn-smith | Excellent, thanks. Can you close the LP bug please? | 15:16 |
| bdrung | i'll do the paperwork and close it | 15:16 |
| jawn-smith | Thanks! | 15:16 |
| ginggs | could we have a look at LP: #1979297 and see if it's something we want carded please? | 15:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1979297 in pyopencl (Ubuntu) "pyopencl: please RM riscv64 binaries" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979297 | 15:16 |
| jawn-smith | xypron: Thoughts on carding this? | 15:17 |
| jawn-smith | We've agreed to let the removal go ahead, and therefore this does not need a card | 15:21 |
| jawn-smith | That's it for kk | 15:21 |
| jawn-smith | #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs | 15:21 |
| jawn-smith | bug 1979951 | 15:21 |
| ubottu | Bug 1979951 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "127.0.0.1/::1 removed from loopback interface if you configure extra IPs on lo (r104 regression/behaviour change)" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979951 | 15:21 |
| slyon | I tagged that one | 15:21 |
| jawn-smith | Is filed against both netplan.io and systemd | 15:21 |
| slyon | it's a regression, probably introduced by netplan switching to the "networkctl reload" command (instead of hard restart of sd-networkd) | 15:22 |
| slyon | I think we should double check the situation on NetworkManager vs sd-networkd backends | 15:22 |
| jawn-smith | Based on your last comment it seems this should be fixed in systemd, not netplan.io? Or do both need work? | 15:22 |
| slyon | and then probably apply the upstream fix to systemd that's mentioned in the bug | 15:22 |
| slyon | most probably systemd only | 15:22 |
| slyon | so +1 for carding it | 15:22 |
| jawn-smith | enr0n: Do you have the bandwidth to look into this? | 15:22 |
| enr0n | jawn-smith: Yeah I should now | 15:23 |
| jawn-smith | Okay so let's card it since someone has bandwidth to look into it. mclemenceau do you mind doing the carding? | 15:23 |
| mclemenceau | Ok | 15:24 |
| schopin | Do we want proper lo support in netplan, too? It does seem kinda hacky to use the ethernet type for it? | 15:24 |
| slyon | schopin: we have a feature-request/bug report about "dummy" devices, which would be a better match for loopback | 15:24 |
| slyon | we'll get to that eventually | 15:24 |
| xnox | it would help with default resolved configs of dns too. | 15:25 |
| schopin | nice, thanks :) | 15:25 |
| xnox | (to set that on lo) | 15:25 |
| jawn-smith | Okay excellent. It will be carded and the priority can be figured out in the future | 15:25 |
| jawn-smith | bug 1978125 | 15:25 |
| ubottu | Bug 1978125 in apt (Ubuntu Jammy) "apt ignoring pin/block/hold files in preferences.d for snapd" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978125 | 15:25 |
| jawn-smith | we discussed this last week but I don't remember where we landed | 15:25 |
| * jawn-smith reads logs | 15:25 | |
| schopin | carded already | 15:25 |
| jawn-smith | Okay so let's just remove the tag from the LP bug | 15:26 |
| jawn-smith | I'll do that real quick | 15:26 |
| ogayot | in iproute2, dummy and loopback type both exist | 15:26 |
| jawn-smith | tag removed | 15:26 |
| jawn-smith | rls-ii is empty | 15:27 |
| jawn-smith | rls-ff only has the 127.0.0.1 bug | 15:27 |
| jawn-smith | #topic Team proposed-migration report | 15:28 |
| jawn-smith | #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs | 15:28 |
| jawn-smith | no v_orlon today so I'll do this | 15:28 |
| jawn-smith | ubuntu-meta is still with desktop | 15:28 |
| slyon | we should probably ignore the systemd failures, as we've uploaded v251 today and all systemd related tests are currently re-run | 15:29 |
| jawn-smith | python3-stdlib-extensions was with doko I believe | 15:29 |
| jawn-smith | Any updates? | 15:29 |
| jawn-smith | slyon: ack, thanks. Will ignore systemd | 15:30 |
| jawn-smith | doko will look at python-bayespy and bdrung will look at apport. Thanks! | 15:31 |
| jawn-smith | usb-creator is waiting on an MIR | 15:31 |
| jawn-smith | mutt is also waiting on an MIR (which is waiting on security) | 15:31 |
| jawn-smith | systemd, skip | 15:31 |
| doko | is anybody working on these MIRs? | 15:31 |
| ginggs | i think python-bayespy just needs a retry with the new version | 15:31 |
| slyon | doko: yes, those are in progress | 15:32 |
| doko | ta | 15:32 |
| jawn-smith | doko: Yes, at least the two mutt related MIRs are waiting on security review | 15:32 |
| schopin | alexghiti is the one driving them from our side | 15:33 |
| jawn-smith | openssl | 15:33 |
| schopin | on it | 15:33 |
| jawn-smith | schopin: hooray, thanks | 15:33 |
| jawn-smith | llvm-toolchain-14 | 15:33 |
| schopin | missing builds are for the same reason as gcc, I believe. | 15:34 |
| jawn-smith | Excellent. Does i386 need to be re-triggered? | 15:34 |
| ginggs | jawn-smith: do it! | 15:35 |
| jawn-smith | done! | 15:35 |
| doko | and the autopkg test failure is a kill -9 | 15:35 |
| jawn-smith | the autopkgtests for this fenics-dofinx package look flakey | 15:35 |
| doko | so try on a machine with more memory? | 15:36 |
| schopin | there was a sigkill in the test suite, oom? | 15:36 |
| jawn-smith | Does it need to be added to big-packages? | 15:36 |
| jawn-smith | Anyone want to volunteer to look into that? | 15:36 |
| ginggs | i'll have a look at fenics-dofinx and add it to big_packages | 15:36 |
| jawn-smith | thanks! | 15:37 |
| ginggs | now, that I can :) | 15:37 |
| jawn-smith | moving on | 15:37 |
| jawn-smith | lintian appears to need MIR investigation | 15:37 |
| slyon | yay! new lintian depends. they're being introduced faster than we can process them :) | 15:37 |
| jawn-smith | or possibly just binary package demotion if we're lucky? | 15:37 |
| slyon | I'll do the initial investigation for lintian | 15:37 |
| jawn-smith | slyon: thanks! | 15:37 |
| jawn-smith | apport is with bdrung | 15:38 |
| jawn-smith | python-httplib2. One of those is apport and therefore already covered | 15:38 |
| jawn-smith | then python-httplib2 itself has an armhf regression | 15:38 |
| ogayot | I think the python-httplib2 vs apport needs a retry | 15:38 |
| jawn-smith | anyone here an expert in both python and the armhf architecture....? | 15:38 |
| waveform | erm... | 15:39 |
| jawn-smith | waveform: do you have bandwidth to look at that test? | 15:39 |
| waveform | yeah, I'll take that one | 15:39 |
| ogayot | E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cryptography' | 15:39 |
| jawn-smith | Thanks! | 15:39 |
| jawn-smith | well that should be an easy fix | 15:40 |
| jawn-smith | moving on, curl is missing builds on quite a few architectures | 15:40 |
| jawn-smith | I'll take that one | 15:40 |
| waveform | don't jinx it... | 15:40 |
| jawn-smith | pygments | 15:40 |
| jawn-smith | has an excuses bug already | 15:41 |
| jawn-smith | waiting on a new version of pytest | 15:41 |
| jawn-smith | so we can ignore that for now | 15:42 |
| jawn-smith | everything else is 0 days old so that's it for proposed migration | 15:42 |
| bdrung | https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pytest shows a lot of regressions | 15:42 |
| jawn-smith | #topic AOB | 15:42 |
| jawn-smith | Monday is a US holiday | 15:43 |
| * xnox 0/ | 15:43 | |
| xnox | a few ubiquity uploads to jammy & kinetic are missing from lp:ubiquity. Does anybody want to push their git tags / uploads? or should i synthesize those? | 15:44 |
| xnox | i.e. uploads from bdrung bdmurray and external person. | 15:44 |
| bdrung | the commits are here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+ref/master | 15:46 |
| xnox | bdrung: and tags? git push --tags | 15:49 |
| xnox | 22.10.3 | 15:49 |
| xnox | 22.04.16 | 15:49 |
| xnox | 22.04.15 | 15:49 |
| xnox | https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity?h=master => tags and jammy branch are missing. | 15:50 |
| xnox | i can tag 22.04.16 and push it to jammy branch, if that's what we are ok with. | 15:50 |
| xnox | but want to check if something unexpected happened. | 15:51 |
| xnox | also tsimonq2 upload is nowhere to be seen in git | 15:51 |
| bdrung | it's probably fine to add the missing tags (after checking that this tag actually is identical to the uploaded dsc) | 15:51 |
| xnox | also http://launchpadlibrarian.net/607553669/ubiquity_22.10.2_22.10.3.diff.gz chagnes the icon, which is not documented, and not expected? | 15:52 |
| xnox | i'll query that separately. | 15:53 |
| jawn-smith | This conversation seems to be resolved, so | 15:57 |
| jawn-smith | #endmeeting | 15:57 |
| meetingology | Meeting ended at 15:57:59 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-06-30-15.00.moin.txt | 15:58 |
| bdrung | for the apport autopkgtest failure we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1980390 now | 16:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1980390 in apport (Ubuntu) "test_core_dump_packaged test flaky on arm64 and ppc64el" [Undecided, New] | 16:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!