[12:28] <jbicha> please reject the earlier gnome-control-center 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 from jammy/unapproved . I just uploaded an updated SRU
[14:20] <dbungert> sil2100: if I push a subiquity snap to latest/stable/ubuntu-22.04.1, will that appear in the point release ISOs?
[15:31] <athos> Hi ubuntu-archive, could anyone have a look at LP: #1980695 regarding removing the pgloader armhf binary from the archive?
[15:31] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1980695 in pgloader (Ubuntu) "please remove pgloader binaries from armhf" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980695
[15:39] <sil2100> dbungert: hm, from what I know it might not be enough. I think livecd-rootfs takes the subiquity version from stable/ubuntu-$(release_ver) and release_ver is what we get from distro-info -r, which IIRC doesn't include the point version
[15:40] <sil2100> dbungert: so it would have to go to stable/ubuntu-22.04
[15:46] <cpaelzer> athos: it would be nicer if it would not even try to build it there instead of failing - do you happen to know if that was discussed?
[15:48] <cpaelzer> seems not to allow it to come back if every fixed
[15:48] <cpaelzer> I'll link the debian RM bug to your bug as well
[15:51] <cpaelzer> athos: I agree to your case, but since I haven't done this subcase of removal yet I've sent my command that I'd issue to doko for review
[15:54] <dbungert> sil2100: ah, thanks.  We shouldn't push to stable/ubuntu-22.04 yet for the untested things, as existing 22.04 ISO users would see that snap.  Would you be open to a livecd-rootfs enhancement here?
[16:14] <vorlon> athos: please subscribe ubuntu-archive to removal bugs
[17:52] <bdmurray> I'm looking into / sorting out the downed armhf autopkgtest workers.
[17:58] <jbicha> bdmurray: I see you're busy now. But if you have time, gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng has aged 7 days in jammy-proposed & is needed for oem partners
[17:59] <bdmurray> jbicha: I've added to my list of things to do after this indcident is resolved
[18:40] <bdmurray> jbicha: Have you done any testing of the gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng to see if it still works as expected?
[18:52] <jbicha> bdmurray: I verified that the extension seems to work & I verified bug 1978330. I don't have the hardware to complete the test cases for the other 2 bugs personally
[18:52] <ubottu> Bug 1978330 in gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng (Ubuntu Jammy) "Extension does odd things when other extension is disabled" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978330
[18:54] <bdmurray> jbicha: I saw that the SRU bugs were verified I was more concerned functional testing of it to avoid regressions.
[19:04] <bdmurray> arif-ali: I've replied in bug 1978465 regarding the microrelase update of python-os-brick
[19:04] <ubottu> Bug 1978465 in python-os-brick (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU] Stable point releases for python-os-brick" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1978465
[19:22] <Eickmeyer[m]> Quick question: In Kinetic, carla FTBFS. How long do I have to get this fixed before removal? I'm working with upstream to figure out what's going wrong.
[19:32] <bdmurray> sil2100: Reading https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/comments/25 do all the packages need to be released together or you concerned about only one of them being updated because of the EoL of Impish?
[19:32] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1972665 in nova (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU] Xena stable releases" [Undecided, Fix Committed]