[00:12] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: why did you restrict the architecture field when uploading dpf-plugins?+
[00:13] <Eickmeyer[m]> vorlon: Woah, that was a very long time ago, I'd have to go back and check.
[00:13] <vorlon> ok, well the package has been stuck in -proposed ever since because it regressed the architecture support
[00:15] <Eickmeyer[m]> Oh, nvm, that was a package upgrade. Let me figure out why.
[00:20] <Eickmeyer[m]> vorlon: Found the reason, this was sloppy packaging on my part as I didn't take the upstream packaging from Debian as, for some reason, I had it in my head that this was an Ubuntu package. I'll fix this in short order.
[00:20] <vorlon> Eickmeyer[m]: cheers
[09:06] <bdrung> ubuntu-archive, please drop the apport SRU from the jammy unapproved queue. I want to upload a version that fixes all autopkgtest issues.
[09:08] <tjaalton> bdrung: done
[09:09] <bdrung> tjaalton, thanks. can you also drop the focal SRU?
[09:11] <tjaalton> bdrung: done that too
[09:11] <tjaalton> *did
[09:13] <tjaalton> sil2100: meh, mesa backport jammy->focal would need a newer libva
[09:14] <tjaalton> this dep bump went below the radar, as sid/jammy already had that
[09:22] <bdrung> tjaalton, thanks
[09:38] <tjaalton> sil2100: and that's not the only one, wayland-protocols would also need to be updated
[10:47] <sil2100> tjaalton: hm, so to get the new mesa we'd have to have quite a big stack update?
[10:49] <tjaalton> sil2100: yeah :/
[10:50] <tjaalton> the libva change can be reverted
[10:55] <sil2100> tjaalton: so how many package updates are we thinking right now?
[10:56] <tjaalton> sil2100: llvm-13 (new), libdrm, wayland-protocols
[10:56] <tjaalton> for mesa, and mesa-amber (new) so that old dri drivers are still available
[10:57] <tjaalton> mesa-amber, llvm-13 and libdrm are on the queue
[10:57] <tjaalton> wayland-protocols is kinda a trivial one, since it's just xml files
[10:58] <tjaalton> it needs 1.24, jammy/kinetic has 1.25-1
[11:00] <sil2100> I think this still feels 'okay', especially if libva can be skipped
[11:00] <sil2100> Let me try looking at those in the queue too
[11:02] <tjaalton> llvm took a few iterations to build, but what has been reverted is to again avoid backporting more
[11:02] <tjaalton> uh
[11:02] <tjaalton> wayland-protocols needs newer meson..
[11:08] <tjaalton> I'll try to relax it, maybe 0.53.2 has subproject support backported
[11:09] <sil2100> All this starts sounding scary. What's your feeling, with all the changes you need to do to relax the dependencies and such, is it still relatively safe to update?
[11:10] <tjaalton> well, it could be done post .5
[11:11] <tjaalton> if at all
[11:13] <tjaalton> well, wayland-protocols built with 0.53.2
[11:16] <tjaalton> "egl/wayland: add initial dma-buf feedback support" would need to be reverted to avoid new wayland-protocols
[11:16] <tjaalton> should be doable I think
[11:23] <tjaalton> then again, that might open another can of worms
[11:25] <tjaalton> sil2100: safest to skip, and if someone later yells loudly, try again with more time?
[11:25] <tjaalton> post .5
[11:33] <tjaalton> pushed a build with the reverts to a ppa to see how it goes
[11:44] <tjaalton> bah, incomplete backport, build failed
[11:45] <tjaalton> will need to revisit this later in the evening
[16:39] <Eickmeyer[m]> tjaalton: If you've got an extra SRU cycle for a quick ack on quassel? bug 1980687, affects both lubuntu and ubuntu studio.
[17:25] <vorlon> sklearn/metrics/tests/test_dist_metrics.py::test_cdist[X11-X21-metric_param_grid0] Fatal Python error: Bus error
[17:25] <vorlon> <table flip>
[17:28] <Eickmeyer[m]> oof
[20:23] <Eickmeyer[m]> vorlon: RE: tjaalton 's message above, I've got people willing to test on standby.
[20:23] <Eickmeyer[m]> Rather, my message to him.