[00:02] i think shotwell will [00:10] how to upgrade from Xubuntu 20.04 to 22.04? [00:12] the option for notification of lts upgrades is checked in software updates but no update is offered [00:14] The LTS jump is usually offered on the first point release. [00:59] is there a way to trigger the LTS jump (a specific command perhaps)? [01:11] RoadRunner, do-release-upgrade -d [01:13] ravage: can't seem to look up this command in man [01:13] no need to specify the number of the release? and what does the -d switch do? [01:14] it will tell you the release. it should be jammy [01:14] d is usually developent [01:17] so 22.04 is still considered 'in development' rather than 'stable'? [01:20] it is stable. just upgrades from 20.04 are not open for public yet [01:22] do you know what the delay is due to (if it was released in April...)? [01:27] RoadRunner: Upgrade path opens up with the 22.04.1 release - as is usuaual with the LTS releases. [01:29] Bashing-om: if the .1 release is the last chance to pick up bad bugs, do you know when the .1 release is expected then? [01:36] RoaadRunner, someone here said .1 is slaated for August [01:40] ravage: Ah, thanks for mentioning that, I was sort of quietly wondering why I hadn't been offered an upgrade. Heh, I assumed I borked something somewhere. [01:42] so, from April to August is 4 month, is this a typical schedule for finalizing an LTS or is it taking longer due to Covid, etc? [01:47] RoadRunner: 4 months cadens is nornal; 22.04.01 >> Expected: 2022-08-04 -- See: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-22.04.1 . [01:48] which is the best file system type for postgresql now adays? === ootput5 is now known as ootput [02:10] Bughunting is a continuous process. Ubuntu never sleeps. [02:11] torniq: A table-optimized all RAM system (none are public yet). [02:11] torniq: I would recommend a filesystem that you're familiar with and for which you know how to use recovery and modification tools. [02:17] so, since there's a snap in ubuntu that apparently manages its own upgrades and cannot be disabled, i should ps| grep snap before every shutdown? [02:19] deego: for what? [02:27] https://bpa.st/UXNQ something weird is happening on the Ubuntu 2204. I have setup proxmox 7 latest. PVE can ping google, has name resolution, fine. LXC container inside, can ping 1.1.1.1/8.8.8.8 and can ping PVE, but even with the correct IP in /etc/resolv.conf I can't get any resolution. Please advise. Ubuntu 22.04 in LXC on Proxmox [02:28] Ubuntu 22.04, /etc/resolv.conf has `nameserver 1.1.1.1` and `nameserver 8.8.8.8` [02:28] I can ping 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8 from Ubuntu 22.04. But I have no name resolution. [02:28] Thank you. [02:30] Hash: I think you want ##proxmox [02:30] Does DNS resolution require that any port 53 or 59 be forwarded or something to the containers? [02:31] !info proxmox | Hash : you probably want to /join ##proxmox for support with proxmox and it's networking [02:31] Hash : you probably want to /join ##proxmox for support with proxmox and it's networking: Package proxmox does not exist in jammy [02:32] Yeah, I'm not asking for prox mox help [02:32] I only gave that information as background. [02:32] Where the Ubuntu 22.04 is running. the Ubuntu OS can ping the name server, has the correct nameserver entry, but no name resolution. [02:32] I can manualy ping google ips, but no name resolution. [02:33] I would help, but you have me on ignore ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [02:34] Even if it was a VPS, I wouldn't go to my VPS provider. I'm using Ubuntu, and it can ping the nameserver ip, but I can't get any resolution. [02:34] After installaion, I find /etc/resolv.conf as well as /etc/resolvconf/* [02:34] I'm not sure what that second directory is about [02:34] And I have no idea who just used the bot to takl to me. [02:34] I don't see any nicks talking here [02:35] I'll come back another time when some other folks are around. [02:35] Hash: Looking... [02:35] Sunday night, not much activity [02:35] Patience is virtue! :D [02:35] Hey arraybolt3[m] howdy ho [02:36] https://bpa.st/V6YA arraybolt3[m] better log. [02:36] arraybolt3[m]: the first thing I would look at is where proxmox is getting it's Ubuntu 22.04 images from. If they're not official ubuntu cloud images, they're modified in some way and aren't supported [02:36] Hash: I see your problem, I'll look at it. [02:36] Take your time. [02:36] And thank you very much [02:37] Hash: Where are you getting the Ubuntu 22.04 image from? Proxmox? Or are you getting them from an official source? [02:37] Yes, the templates available in there. [02:37] I'm now assuming, since you said, it's not an official source. [02:37] Ok. Np. [02:37] I will try an official source ISO. Np. [02:37] I will report back on that new install. [02:37] Hash: OK. [02:38] arraybolt3[m]: but funny though, right? Curious issue. [02:38] How can networking be correctly configured and yet have no resolution but can ping the name server ips. [02:39] Hash: Yeah, Proxmox shouldn't be letting that happen. Even if the official ISO does work, you might want to still bring it up on the Proxmox channel so that they can fix it for other users. [02:39] I have another data center in another server, and there I'm using ubuntu 20 LTS image template, and that works fine. [02:39] (Maybe your nameserver isn't properly configured? 🤷‍♂️_ [02:39] I gotcha. [02:39] It's google. [02:39] And cloudflare. 1111/8888. inside /etc/resolv.conf as in the paste. [02:39] LOL well that had better be configured right! [02:39] Correct format [02:39] Correct sytnax,. [02:41] Hash: One last possibility, maybe you need to turn on the networking service in Ubuntu. I know Arch won't let you connect to the Internet even if everything's configured right unless you turn the service on. Not sure if Ubuntu Server in LXC will treat you the same way or not, but if the official image fails, that's something to check. [02:42] If I try to do /etc/init.d/netwoTAB I get nothing. [02:42] No service like that. prehaps systemd- [02:44] Restarted it and no dice. [02:44] service is active. [02:44] `systemd-networkd` [02:44] Hash: What about netplan? [02:44] hmm [02:44] nothing in /etc/netplan [02:45] 'netplan apply' might do something. [02:45] Not if there is nothing to apply [02:45] But let's find out [02:46] There's nothing in /etc/netplan? That might be your problem right there. [02:46] https://bpa.st/2CLQ [02:46] Well it's using /etc/network/interfaces [02:46] Netplan isn't needed [02:46] then it's not a supported 22.04 image [02:46] Which wasn't even installed on it by this image/template thing in pve [02:46] it's modified [02:47] hash: If Netplan isn't involved, then this isn't an official image, and it's probably the problem. Try an official image - that may solve everything. [02:47] Really? [02:47] (Netplan is part of the heart of Ubuntu Server's networking, so if it's not working, it's no wonder things are broken.) [02:47] Hmm ok [02:49] It's a dedicated server [02:49] Oh wrong window [05:14] OK making a boot-usb (liveUSB) and forgot how to do the integrity check. I ranthe sha256sum but dont have anything to compare it to. (instructions unclear=For Linux, simply run the command below in terminal and compare the output with the “SHA256SUMS” file in previous download link.) [05:16] wait wait dont tell me: I found it on the download page [05:17] isnt there a program to compare the two strings too? === xenial is now known as Guest4019 [05:19] I pasted them into textedit ok the bogus version, gedit or something, yeah text editor [05:21] making it. thanks for the space to think. === Guest8232 is now known as Daniel === _--_ is now known as Guest9227 === feelingsreal is now known as Guest6966 === Blohsh is now known as Guest4772 [06:38] !md5 | morganu [06:38] morganu: To verify your Ubuntu ISO image (or other files for which an MD5 checksum is provided), see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM or http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/answers/LQ_ISO/Checking_the_md5sum_in_Windows [06:39] morganu: recent ubuntu releases also have an auto integrity check on booting up the usb/media === xenial is now known as Guest5507 === diskin is now known as Guest476 === diskin_ is now known as diskin [08:03] Hi there, I accidentally poured tea over my laptop and it was working fine for a few weeks... However now the wifi does not work anymore. I am wondering whether this is a hardware or software problem. Any idea how to confirm whether the hardware is fried? [08:04] chmd: you could boot a live usb and see if it works [08:04] dmesg keeps looping on "authentication with [mac address of the wifi router] timed out === ootput0 is now known as ootput [08:05] EriC^^: not a bad idea. However it would be great if there was a way to obtain logs for my IT department [08:06] chmd: you just did obtain the logs [08:06] you just said dmesg is looping [08:06] that's a log === alucardromer0-l2 is now known as alucardromero-l2 === Probie964 is now known as Probie96 [08:26] using try ubuntu22.04 [08:27] apt cant locate package chrome. what's the procedure? webapge? [08:28] opuntia: chrome is not an official ubuntu package [08:28] opuntia: try chromium browser as ubuntu alternate instead [08:28] opuntia: You can install Chromium from the Snap store - it's the open-source version of Chrome and has almost all the same features. [08:30] opuntia: "sudo snap install chromium" should do the trick. [08:30] ok I'll do that. ff scrolls in the wrong direction. i cant be bothered to learn it while I am just trying. [08:30] kk [08:30] opuntia: That sounds like a touchpad problem, not a browser problem. [08:30] opuntia: Try opening your mouse settings, and disable anything called "Reverse scrolling", "Natural scrolling", or something like that. [08:31] liste, I want to shrink my partition from 325G to say 200 gigs, bigger than the amount I am using. - Will gparted arrange to have the files scattered around the drive all neatly packaged into the smaller space? Or not? (OC I will backup.) [08:32] I just hate to have to erinstall everything [08:32] opuntia: You should be able to just shrink the partition AFAIK. I've shrunk partitions before with OK results. [08:32] re-install [08:33] nice. Now I have tomorrows work all cut out for me. [08:33] usa 1am [08:35] thanks and good night. this seems pretty zippy. New versions have a lot worked out better. I really want to see if it can handle a lot of chrome tabs without freezing the computer like 20.04 does. [08:35] opuntia: Heads-up, the computer probably won't freeze, but Chromium will probably vanish once you open too much stuff. [08:35] (Welcome to systemd-oomd, they're working on it.) [08:35] or it might be my memory. maemtest doesnt work on this. it locks in the first second. [08:36] opuntia: If you're talking about the memtest that comes with the ISO, I've never gotten it to test beyond 4096MB, I think that's a limitation of the tester itself. It fails on machines that work just fine, and it always fails right there. [08:36] when I do the installation I will be prolly using chrome. [08:37] ah, thanks arraybolt3[m] I have 8G. and the Dell tests come out just fine. -- But I ONLY have 82 tabs open. (I counted today) [08:49] ubuntu dual boot [08:49] how to do it [08:49] I booted usb, free space done then ? [08:52] arraybolt3[m] mouse scroling natural, adjusted in system settings (not chrome) [08:52] MR_R0B0T I think I can help you. What system do you have on your computer now? [08:53] Assuming it is windows you should first partition your hard drive with windows so that windows doestn see anything unexpected. [08:54] After that you will have a partition to install ubuntu in. [08:54] yes .I made a free space in windows and made a bootable usb now I'm on boot menu [08:54] opuntia: thanks [08:54] choose install ubuntu [08:55] do I need to turn on efi , something like that in boot menu? last time I tried to install it says no efi like that error msg [08:55] and keep going. The confusing part is when you get to the partition the hard drive part. Nowadays you dont need to do anything special with swp and all like in the old days. [08:55] swp should have been swap [08:56] oh yes. to be certan ask someone else. As I remember you have to run off something LIKE safe boot too. [08:57] or ask the google. There are several forums like askubuntu ubuntuforums etc that answer these standard questions. Just PAY ATTENTION to the year. [08:57] it asks for two options , one is legacy ,other one is UEFI [08:57] I am too tired not USA to be trusted on detail like this. [08:57] legacy [08:57] ok [08:58] I forgot about that till you mentioned. [08:58] and safe boot too. I think that's it. [08:58] ok now in install Ubuntu page [08:59] great to have the page plus a person [08:59] I have to do the same for my PIA HP laptop. [09:00] When I started I broke the entire hard drive into partitions to prepare for newer versions or distros. Now I dont care about distros, just ubuntu. [09:01] I think I deleted the windows :( [09:02] I selected the entire disk option [09:02] will it delete or what [09:04] it says windows repairing mode [09:06] I rebooted now I'm back on ubuntu installation [09:09] now the uefi not showing === diskin_ is now known as diskin [09:16] now the pendrive is not showing in the boot menu [09:16] Does your windows install still boot when the flash drive isn't plugged in? [09:18] MR_R0B0T: selecting the entire disk option wipes the whole hard drive [09:19] MR_R0BOT: Did you back up your data before doing this? [09:19] If not, STOP USING THE SYSTEM IMMEDIEATELY. [09:19] you should have selected install ubuntu next to windows [09:19] It may be possible to recover any files you lost. [09:19] (At least, it may be possible to recover some of them.) === c0li- is now known as c0li [09:21] Does the ubuntu installer let you try to install to the installer usb? He mentions the usb doesn't boot anymore [10:02] is there a means of rectifying that ghosted desktop icon you get in gnome? === Bencraft14198 is now known as Bencraft1419 === gdb_ is now known as gdb [10:43] i've installed ubuntu on a 2TB nvme, .. by default it only gave me 100GB. Unsure why, but .... how can you bump the amount of disk space available for this? [10:48] default install only does 100GB, crazy. Figured it out [11:06] Hi [11:08] I'm doing kernel cleanup. Which packages should I uninstall per kernel version? I see linux-headers-*, linux-image, linux-modules, linux-modules-extra, linux-hwe... anything else? [11:11] ...and what the hell is hwe? [11:11] cousteau: You shouldn't have to do that, just run "sudo apt autoremove", and that should take care of it. (If it looks like it's about to uninstall a ton of stuff other than just kernels, don't do that.) [11:12] !hwe | cousteau [11:12] cousteau: The Ubuntu LTS enablement stacks provide newer kernel and X support for existing LTS releases, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack [11:12] cousteau: HWE is the Hardware Enablement Stack. An HWE kernel basically is a newer Linux kernel on an older version of Ubuntu. It gives older but supported Ubuntu versions compatibility with more hardware. [11:13] arraybolt3[m]: well, at least in this Ubuntu version, `apt -s autoremove` doesn't say it will uninstall any kernel image/header/modules [11:14] cousteau: Hmm. I've experienced that on Kubuntu before. I had success following a particular guide, let me see if I can find it... [11:15] arraybolt3[m]: I see, so I guess I should uninstall unused linux-hwe versions as well? [11:15] cousteau: I think? (someone correct me if I'm wrong here) that HWE kernels show up just like any other kernels in Ubuntu, and you can remove them the same way. [11:15] Here's the guide I followed: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RemoveOldKernels [11:16] arraybolt3[m]: there's RemoveOldKernels in the Ubuntu wiki, if that's what you mean [11:16] I used the "Other methods" part of the guide. [11:16] Yeah that one [11:16] I'll do it manually for now [11:17] I got bitten by "separate and ridiculously small /boot partition because the disk is encrypted" issue === Bahhumbug is now known as el-bot === el-bot is now known as Bahhumbug [11:29] Weird. /boot/initrd.img was pointing to initrd.img-5.13.0.52-generic, but that file didn't exist because the disk was full. Nevertheless, after removing old kernels and freeing up space, that file has appeared. What is this sorcery [11:30] Sounds like unattended-upgrades doing its magic at just the right time to be noticable, to me. [11:30] Did it get installed automatically? Or was it already present and just didn't show up before because of disk issues? Maybe I should reinstall it just in case [11:31] It probably got installed automatically. You might want to run a quick "sudo apt update && sudo apt full-upgrade" just for good measure, though. [11:32] Hm. The output of the previous apt purge doesn't show anything about installing anything... [11:33] But yeah, an update is in order, just in case [11:36] Hey guys stupid question asked it before what software can I use to stream audio from home to vlc for rdmaple kind of hoe Winamp allowed streams back in day === soju-test-user_ is now known as soju-test-user [11:37] Psil0: Are you trying to listen to music saved at home while you're abroad, like from your phone or laptop? [11:43] how do you ask ubuntu to show a little minimap of your workspaces? [12:12] Psil0[m]: VLC allows streaming [12:12] But I forgot how [12:14] But if you stream through a port and open that port on your router then you can open your IP:port remotely and listen to your music. I've done that before [12:16] If you want something more like a "file server", there's software for that. PLEX comes to mind, but that's more for movies I think [12:33] Is there a way to make apt -s ask me to confirm what is going to (simulately) delete? Just to have the real experience [12:37] Hmm, man 2 getrandom() says it was introduced in version 3.17 of the Linux kernel. However, on linux 3.10 getrandom syscall also works. Why? [12:51] cousteau: what is -s with apt? [12:52] cousteau: did you try -u with apt? [13:03] deego: -s = Simulate, or dry run, i.e., only print which packages will be installed or removed, but do not actually install or remove them [13:04] cousteau, aptitude will ask for confirmation [13:04] (and it can be run without sudo, since it's not actually installing nor removing anything) [13:04] I don't have aptitude installed anyway [13:04] (I really do miss `aptitude why` though) [13:05] Petition to add a similar capability to `aptitude why` to `apt`! [13:05] (who maintains the `apt` executable? Is it an Ubuntu thing? [13:05] Debian thing [13:06] Aw [13:06] (just to clarify I meant the `apt` command that acts as a front end to `apt-get` and others, not the APT system in general) [13:07] apt-get is the old way, it is apt now, as intelligent as aptitude. [13:07] Not as intelligent. It doesn't provide an `apt why` command! [13:08] https://launchpad.net/apt gives the maintainer. [13:08] .. apt why? [13:09] oerheks: in any case, apt is not exactly a replacement for apt-get; it just calls apt-get under the hood, if I understand correctly [13:09] no, it does not call apt-get [13:10] it does more with apt-cache AFAIK [13:11] It just acts as a front-end to a variety of commands, including apt-get and apt-cache. Or that's what I thought (and the manpage seems to imply, but this isn't clear) [13:12] launchpad.net/apt seems to refer to the whole APT suite, not the apt command specifically [13:13] i used to swear by aptitude, but apt is on the same level now [13:13] Yeah, aptitude was the real deal back in the day [13:14] But my understanding was that apt was developed merely as a front end. And it would make sense too, why repeat the work rewriting a tool that already exists? [13:15] it's not a front-end to apt-get [13:17] cousteau: use apt-get for scripting, use apt for everything else [13:17] oh yes, that is the downside of apt, not good scriptable. [13:17] The apt binary is only 18K; the apt-get binary is 47K. They either really did a nice job optimizing it for size, or it's just a front end to other tools. (Maybe not apt-get, but definitely other tools.) [13:17] * for now [13:18] cousteau: both apt and apt-get are front-ends for dpkg (sort of) [13:19] Well yeah, but they do more than what dpkg does [13:19] hence the "sort of" [13:19] They handle software repositories, dependencies... [13:20] I mean, they not only install software, but also download it and check for updates. I think dpkg doesn't do that, although it does do all the "heavy lifting" when installing a package [13:22] Basically apt is the boss and dpkg is the intern, which really bothers dpkg because he's been around for WAY longer than his boss [13:25] But it was my understanding that apt-get and apt-cache were the managers, and apt was the CEO [13:25] no [13:25] (like, the chain of command went apt -> apt-get -> dpkg, not directly apt -> dpkg) [13:26] cousteau: it's easy to test. Rename /bin/apt-get and use apt to update, install, remove some things [13:26] actually, /usr/bin/apt-get as well [13:27] I considered doing that, but decided not to do such thing since I don't want to mess with this machine [13:27] Even if it's easy to undo [13:27] 👍️ [13:27] But OK, I believe you [13:27] cousteau: feel free to use a container to test it [13:28] * arraybolt3[m] uses virtual machines when I want to do something dangerous on Linux to see what happens [13:28] It's just weird that they made a redundant tool. Doesn't feel like the UNIX way. [13:28] cousteau: it's verymuch the OSS way. Feel free to discuss more in #ubuntu-offtopic [13:29] OK [13:33] https://unetbootin.github.io/ is missing in the repo [13:36] dust: It would be nice to have. Make a suggestion - I'll vote for it. :) === hasley is now known as mahler [14:15] hi, after installing timeshift on ubuntu, can't apt update because it says filesystem is read-only [14:16] dust: UNetbootin doesn't actually work with a lot of ISOs. [14:16] has not been updated in years === ootput1 is now known as ootput [14:17] alright atleast 1 year [14:17] arraybolt3[m], u can use any iso... [14:17] never had one which didnt work... [14:18] dust: Yes, but many of them will fail in some way. At least I've seen some distros specifically warn to not use UNetbootin. [14:18] which? [14:19] Can't remember off the top of my head, will dig it up. [14:21] dust: openSUSE. [14:22] i remember unetbootin used to work then it didnt so i stopped using it [14:22] arraybolt3[m], link to that info? [14:22] like years ago [14:23] dust: https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Live_USB_stick "Warning: Do not try to apply procedures found on the internet for other distributions to convert the images into bootable sticks (unetbootin). Doing that will break the images. The openSUSE images are already prepared for being used directly on usb sticks, and can persist filesystem changes without further steps." [14:24] https://en.opensuse.org/Create_installation_USB_stick [14:24] here they offer the info how UNetbootin should be used with opensuse... [14:25] Odd. OK, then maybe it's not such a bad idea to include it after all. [14:26] arraybolt3[m], ur info is about not to apply procedures for other distros... not about UNetbootin itself... [14:27] Why would the "setup wizard" start everytime I log in, like I don't have a user created? [14:27] Makes sense. [14:27] After a fresh install [14:27] Hi all [14:27] hello, I have a question about "ufw", I have that: https://termbin.com/d63p, how can I remove rules "22 on eth1 anywhere" and "22 (v6) on eth1 anywhere" ? [14:28] because I tried "ufw delete allow from any to any port 22" or "ufw delete allow from any to any port 22 on eth1" [14:28] nothing work... [14:30] gufw is easier. it has gui [14:31] I work with automation, so gui in my case is unusable [14:32] and also I can delete rule by the number but same, I am not interested about that [14:36] i imported an openvpn config with nmcli, and it works fine (except for not honoring static-challenge), but for some reason it insists on adding a default route through the vpn which shouldnt happen [14:36] is there a lock-screen on ubuntu server [14:37] if anyone has an idea about this.. [14:39] jedorf, sudo ufw status numbered # gives a numbered list, sudo delete 1 # deletes rule 1 [14:39] jedorf, i hope you have some manual now... [14:40] without number I said [14:40] jedorf, then read some manual, i am not going to type out all [14:40] .. really [14:40] also I think I found how to do it [14:41] but really ufw is unstable [14:42] good, have fun [14:43] ufw delete allow in on eth1 from any to any port 22 [14:51] Hrrm... I think I'm hitting https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2475740 [14:51] Intel NUC DC53427HYE and Ethernet not recognized [14:52] dmidecode shows onboard Ethernet enabled, but not in ifconfig etc. [14:52] enyc: what version of ubuntu? [14:52] leftyfb: 22.04... checking kernel updates/versions now [14:52] enyc: ifconfig (not installed by default) only shows active interfaces with no added parameters === VIA is now known as twodudes [14:53] enyc: ip -c a [14:53] leftyfb: GUI network manager similar [14:53] leftyfb: ip -c a only shows 1: lo info [15:02] enyc, have you tried to load the mosule manually ? [15:02] *module [15:09] enyc: if thats your case, also make sure your nuc firmware updates are up to date, those matter on nucs [15:10] lotuspsychje +1 === twodudes is now known as threedudes === descent is now known as fourdudes === fourdudes is now known as descent [15:32] lotuspsychje oerheks : yes, updated to 2020 version ;o [15:32] lotuspsychje oerheks : F7 bios wouldn't updated, needed dos formatted hard disk to run bios update, then reset to defaults etc... now updated, F7 bios update function works but needless as already updated ;O [15:33] now test your networking [15:33] in any case, even on updated, UEFI or Legacy booting kernel 5.15.0-39-generic and no network device === threedudes is now known as VIA [15:33] it is a grey area, bios settings and updates.. [15:33] copying update debs via USB in a mo and will try updated kernel [15:33] oerheks: have tried bios, definitely network enabled, tried uefy and legacy, tried PCIe native function etc... no luck [15:34] enyc, load the module manually with the verbose option [15:34] ioria: most notably I don't see Ethernet device in "lspci" nor "lsusb" [15:34] enyc, lspci -nnk | nc termbin.com 9999 [15:34] ioria: no network to nc termbin ;o [15:35] enyc, use wifi [15:35] ioria: not present ;o [15:35] but will copy to text file 1mo [15:36] enyc, sudo modprobe -v e1000e === drkokandy_ is now known as drkokandy [15:55] ioria: both modprobe -v e1000e and modprobe -v e1000 simply report the module loaded and announce, no more info. Info you requested and more in https://ec2.sheer.us/~enyc/noidx/NUC-DC53427HYE/ [15:56] dmidecode has Status: Enabled [15:56] Description: Intel(R) 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet Device [15:59] enyc, boot with the 'noapic' kernel parameter === Guest4772 is now known as Blohsh [16:04] ioria: no difference. tried also pci=bios, also no difference. [16:05] enyc, do you confirm that the card is not detected by 'lshw -c network ' ? [16:08] ifconfig -a shows unconfigured devices. [16:09] it's not detected at all , according to this : https://ec2.sheer.us/~enyc/noidx/NUC-DC53427HYE/lspci-nnk.txt [16:38] ... and in all the middle of the intel-NUC-ethernet-questions, powercuts! [16:38] enyc: Fun. [16:38] Appears to be all back now, though the Distributor say by 2.5 hours from now aim to have sorted [16:38] Previous experience suggests may go off and on [16:39] enyc: Yeah, that's what I would expect. What grid are you on? [16:39] Quote Engineer en Route [16:39] jhutchins: SSE in UK National Grid [16:39] from a "reverse" BSP [16:39] Are they having load problems? [16:39] "reserve" [16:39] jh potentially [16:40] jhutchins: too much aircon? ;-O [16:40] too much heat :-O [16:40] Yeah, where I grew up nobody had AC in their cars, few houses. Now it's a necessity. [16:40] Oh well, I hear vinyards are doing well in Britain these days. [16:41] same in NL [16:41] Who was givening me answers about NUC ethernet?!!?!? [16:41] We've had a heat index of 136F (Kansas City, center of the U.S.) [16:42] ioria: [16:42] enyc: ioria was. [16:42] enyc: I presume the network controller is imbedded in the motherboard? Chips are soldered in? [16:42] That's super warm. What was the actual temperature? What's his "heat index" nonsense? [16:42] Is that like wind chill? [16:43] enyc: Humidity 50-70% makes a big difference, I think the actual temp was ~101F. [16:43] jhutchins: Good... what? OK, we've had some hot days here in Missouri, but golly. [16:43] jhutchins: embedded on the NUC mini-computer motheboard [16:44] enyc: I would say the next thing to try would be different bootable images with different kernels. [16:44] enyc: It's really surprising to see the hardware not detected at all. [16:44] jhutchins: I was thinking the same, but wanted to ask first, some might say "oh yes all 22.04/derivatives have this on some machines". [16:44] jhutchins: I linked a post about this earlier... [16:45] when does 20.04 get a do-release-upgrade for 22.04 ? [16:45] hans: August 4th. [16:45] hans_: You can update early if you want. [16:45] (Back your data up first thought!) [16:45] hans_: when 22.04.1 released, August 4, 2022 unless you do-release-upgrade -d [16:45] There should be incremental package updates before the official point release. [16:46] Only if you're already on 22.04 tho.... [16:46] there is no incremental package updates from 20.04 to 22.04 [16:46] theyre just normal updates for 20.04 [16:46] Or if you switch to 22.04, then you'll also get the incremental updates to 22.04.1 (unless something is deadly wrong in Ubuntu). [16:47] enigma9o7[m]: Right, but there should be updates of the earlier releases as well. [16:47] enigma9o7[m]: Especially if there's a broken kernel. [16:47] if an 18.04 does do-release-upgrade after 4 august, will it attempt to upgrade to 20.04 or 22.04 ? [16:47] hans_ It should go to 20.04 IIRC. [16:48] There were a lot of Cannonical staff who deferred their Summer vacations until after the release - which is now. [16:48] thanks [16:48] hans_: I would expect it to go to 20.04 now. [16:49] well since release was in april... i.e. the spring.... waiting til afterwards for a summer vacation seems ok... [16:49] i always wait til after spring for my summer vacations anyway [16:49] hey guys, just installed 22.02, where is the printer setting dialog, it isn't in settings. [16:50] you searched for printer? [16:50] yes [16:50] i did search [16:50] great scott [16:51] That's weird. [16:51] jwash: What flavour of Ubuntu are you using? [16:51] https://imgur.com/ViNOWeP.png [16:51] xubuntu [16:51] 22.02? [16:51] yes [16:52] jhutchins: please scrollback -- I quoted a link of a report about this [16:52] jhutchins: on an ubuntu forum or similar, please quote link back to me [16:52] cmon jh, you know what he means [16:52] Ah, Xubuntu. That makes sense. [16:52] what is the name of the applet so i can install? [16:52]