=== rs20091 is now known as rs2009 [03:11] good morning [11:39] EVening lotuspsychje! How are you tonight? [11:40] all good wez tnx and you? [11:41] Great! Finished work, sitting back to a cheese platter and a single malt [11:41] yummy [11:42] It is :) How's the morning so far? Are you working or studying? [11:44] im in holiday wez its afternoon here [11:46] \o/ [11:46] Nice work [11:49] * wez hands lotuspsychje a water cracker with a nice blue vein cheese on top. [14:02] lotuspsychje: Why on earth did you create a new team to duplicate the work of the #ubuntu-bugs-announce:libera.chat bot? [14:02] to see them all in a list [14:03] Eickmeyer: They did it to keep track of the bugs so that they aren't just totally missed and can be fully "made fixable", rather than just given one short comment and then ignored for the rest of forever. (Yeah, I got my inbox flooded at first, too...) [14:03] I think it was a good idea, but the sudden onslaught of emails was a bit "whoa" at first. [14:03] i can change to regular user instead of admin if you dont want the mails [14:04] It also looks like it's gotten multiple people in on suggesting various fixes. [14:04] My thing is I go into #ubuntu-bugs-announce:libera.chat when I have spare time and can take care of it, but I don't need a constant torrent of emails. I'm way too busy with my dayjob (Ubuntu related), Ubuntu Studio, and family life to have that hit me. [14:04] allrighty [14:12] Oh hey wait, I actually liked getting the bug email. lotuspsychje [14:12] (I just got my email all set up to work well with it and everything.) [14:12] ok ill change back to admin for you, i should have asked everyone in front [15:11] Discussion topic: Most computers are either 32-bit or 64-bit. However, there are some systems that have a 64-bit CPU but a 32-bit UEFI firmware. The result is that these laptops are capable of booting and running a 64-bit OS, but the bootloader must be 32-bit. (I believe Debian calls this "mixed-mode UEFI".) [15:11] Ubuntu is currently unable to be installed on a mixed-mode UEFI device, despite the fact that at least one flavour (Lubuntu) attempts to support it. This is because Ubuntu does not ship the required 32-bit bootloader. What would you think about trying to get the Ubuntu devs to add mixed-mode UEFI support in Kinetic? [15:12] (BTW, I've figured out how to create a mixed-mode UEFI VM on a normal system - it's a bit buggy for some reason, but it's sufficient to boot a multiarch Debian ISO, while rejecting the Ubuntu ISOs.) [17:03] jelly: Real mature mate [17:03] g' [17:03] g [17:03] ? [17:04] leftyfb: gg = Good Game [17:05] wez: I understand what gg means. jelly has never said a word here. What are you referring to? [17:08] leftyfb: I was refering to: jelly [jelly@user/jelly] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded] [17:08] What nerve [17:08] Exceeding Max SendQ [17:10] 2 months ago [17:10] again, I don't understand the callout [17:11] It was like it was yesterday, there is no expiration of offending someone [17:12] it was May 07 [17:13] why do you care? [17:13] leftyfb: Because I was offended... Didn't I state that before? [17:13] why were you offended by someone getting booted off a server due to too many users? [17:14] leftyfb: They should have known better, and too many users? You mean they were flooding the server with alts? [17:15] Sounds serious [17:15] that quit message has nothing to do with anything the user has control over [17:15] wez: are you just here to troll? [19:21] sarnold: they've been "quieted" before [19:22] they're honestly not here to do anything but troll [19:22] TY [19:23] leftyfb: sigh. I wish these people would get a hobby or read a book or something [19:25] sarnold: i've been on IRC about over 25 years. Not going to happen [19:25] leftyfb: at least they're mostly annoying people on facebook or twitter these days..