| Furna_ | tomreyn: yes I tried to set explicitly set nameservers https://pastebin.com/fvwYkc6L | 15:55 |
|---|---|---|
| Furna_ | sadly the resulting conf in /run/systemd/network/10blah.network didn't contain the "[IPv6AcceptRA]" section with "UseDns=no" | 15:56 |
| Furna_ | solution for me was to remove the netplan file /etc/netplan/ and create /etc/systemd/network/50-static-eth0.network | 15:57 |
| Furna_ | I would say netplan need a new IPv6AcceptRA mapping | 16:00 |
| slyon | Furna_: could you please file a feature request about that at https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+filebug ? | 16:01 |
| Furna_ | *ipv6acceptra-overrides | 16:02 |
| slyon | maybe just ra-overrides... but that is to be discussed during implementation phase I guess | 16:02 |
| Furna_ | sylon: sure to both | 16:03 |
| slyon | thank you! | 16:04 |
| Furna_ | https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1982010 | 16:15 |
| Furna_ | You are welcome | 16:15 |
| Furna_ | tomreyn: combining explicitly set nameservers with "accept-ra: true" results in all DNS addresses to be available ... resulting in non consistent behaviour (my ISP DNS obviously doesn't have my private LAN records). Anyway I see some corner cases where having all DNS (both manually set and from RA) is desired ... so new mapping in netplan is preferred and it doesn't change current behaviour | 16:21 |
| tomreyn | Furna_: hmm, yes, I was afraid this could be the outcome. It's good that you filed the feature request, I think the situation you describe should really be supported. | 17:31 |
| tomreyn | But I'm just another user, unlike slyon, I think. | 17:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!