[15:55] <Furna_> tomreyn: yes I tried to set explicitly set nameservers https://pastebin.com/fvwYkc6L
[15:56] <Furna_> sadly the resulting conf in /run/systemd/network/10blah.network didn't contain the "[IPv6AcceptRA]" section with "UseDns=no"
[15:57] <Furna_> solution for me was to remove the netplan file /etc/netplan/ and create /etc/systemd/network/50-static-eth0.network
[16:00] <Furna_> I would say netplan need a new IPv6AcceptRA mapping
[16:01] <slyon> Furna_: could you please file a feature request about that at https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+filebug ?
[16:02] <Furna_> *ipv6acceptra-overrides
[16:02] <slyon> maybe just ra-overrides... but that is to be discussed during implementation phase I guess
[16:03] <Furna_> sylon: sure to both
[16:04] <slyon> thank you!
[16:15] <Furna_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1982010
[16:15] <Furna_> You are welcome
[16:21] <Furna_> tomreyn: combining explicitly set nameservers with "accept-ra: true" results in all DNS addresses to be available ... resulting in non consistent behaviour (my ISP DNS obviously doesn't have my private LAN records). Anyway I see some corner cases where having all DNS (both manually set and from RA) is desired ... so new mapping in netplan is preferred and it doesn't change current behaviour
[17:31] <tomreyn> Furna_: hmm, yes, I was afraid this could be the outcome. It's good that you filed the feature request, I think the situation you describe should really be supported.
[17:32] <tomreyn> But I'm just another user, unlike slyon, I think.