[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[03:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[03:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (jammy-proposed/main) [42.2-0ubuntu0.2 => 42.3.1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[06:30] <jbicha> please reject gnome-shell 42.3.1-0ubuntu1 from jammy. I uploaded an updated version instead
[08:09] <laney> ✅
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:43] <ricotz> doko, hi, python3-stdlib-extensions 3.10.5-2 introduced python 3.9 again?
[08:45] <ricotz> seems it is not installable as well :(
[09:15] <ricotz> -MIN_VER = 3.10.4-0ubuntu2~
[09:15] <ricotz> +MIN_VER = 3.10.4-1~
[10:01] <ricotz> please could someone take a look at python3-stdlib-extensions in kinetic-proposed, preferably removing it to allow builds relying on python to proceed?
[10:02] <ricotz> ubuntu-archive, hello ^
[10:04] <luis220413> I sent a no-change rebuild request to doko on June 26 and I did not receive a reply.
[10:05] <luis220413> The package is varnish-vmod-digest in Kinetic.
[10:05] <luis220413> See bug 1979893
[10:07] <doko> ricotz: oops, updating it again
[10:08] <apw> ricotz, looking
[10:10] <ricotz> doko, thanks
[10:10] <ricotz> apw, hi, I guess doko is fixing it
[10:13] <ricotz> doko, this still won't work with "MIN_VER = 3.10.4-1~"
[10:13] <ricotz> doko, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults
[10:18] <doko> also fixed
[10:18] <ricotz> doko, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/613553412/python3-stdlib-extensions_3.10.5-2_3.10.5-2ubuntu1.diff.gz ?
[10:19] <ricotz> ok
[10:19] <ricotz> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/613553835/python3-stdlib-extensions_3.10.5-2ubuntu1_3.10.5-2ubuntu2.diff.gz
[10:19] <ricotz> thanks!
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: raspi-config (jammy-proposed/universe) [20201027ubuntu1 => 20220506-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (raspi)
[10:50] <waveform> argh, can someone reject that raspi-config upload to jammy-proposed? I forgot it needs the orig tar force-included as I'm converting it from native to quilt (for the sake of my sanity)
[10:50] <waveform> oh ... actually, ignore me ... apparently it included the orig tar after all
[11:50] <laney> pretty sure you'll get a rejection even if it gets queued if the orig is missing
[11:50] <laney> ...kind of sure...
[11:57] <luis220413> doko: I sent you a no-change rebuild request via email on June 26 and I did not receive a reply.
[11:58] <luis220413> I want varnish-vmod-digest to be rebuilt to allow varnish to migrate from the proposed pocket to the release pocket. Note that two other packages are blocking the migration and I have requested fixes through Debian bugs.
[11:58] <luis220413> See bug 1979893
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7823 entries have been added or removed
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (jammy-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7 => 1:4.7.0-1ubuntu8] (ubuntu-server)
[13:34] <vorlon> jbicha: do you have insight into why remmina-plugin-spice was allowed to become uninstallable in kinetic, and is a fix in progress?
[13:35] <jbicha> vorlon: it is temporarily no longer built by the remmina source package. Do you use that plugin?
[13:35] <vorlon> jbicha: no, I monitor devel uninstallables ;D
[13:36] <vorlon> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/kinetic_uninst.txt
[13:36] <vorlon> so looks like this is NBS and should be manually removed
[13:36] <vorlon> thanks
[13:36] <jbicha> I don't know why it didn't show up on NBS automatically
[13:37] <vorlon> jbicha: it actually did but the NBS and uninstallable reports update at different cycles
[13:37] <vorlon> so I didn't notice this is an uninstallable package that I already removed
[13:37] <kanashiro_> SRU team: could anyone please reject the resource-agents upload to jammy-proposed? this is wrong
[13:37] <jbicha> the plugin was a casualty of the libsoup3-in-main transition. There is a good chance it won't come back in time for Kinetic but I haven't looked into how much coding work is necessary
[13:40] <vorlon> jbicha: no worries, uninstallables cleaned up so no particular action needed from my side
[13:41] <jbicha> I figured out the virt-viewer situation earlier that I was inquiring about. The phodav transition was complex but finished now & virt-viewer still works ok :)
[13:42] <vorlon> huzzah
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[14:37] <fheimes> hi SRU team, could you please have a look at s390-tools(-signed) packages in the focal unapproved queue and ideally approve? (it's stuck in the queue for quite a while) - many thx
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (bionic-proposed/main) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu4 => 2:17.0.13-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (jammy-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7 => 1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7.1] (ubuntu-server)
[14:58] <Eickmeyer[m]> Hi SRU team! Trying to get ubuntustudio-meta (bug 1980901) in before 22.04.1 freeze. Just adds libreoffice-calc back to the meta, already added back to the seed per the FFe of the same bug.
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, svt-av1 is needed on i386 by ffmpeg...
[15:08] <LocutusOfBorg> also librist I would say...
[15:13] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: where would I see that librist is needed? is it visible in the current build log?
[15:13] <vorlon> yes it is
[15:13] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/613586504/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-i386.ffmpeg_7%3A5.0.1-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[15:13] <LocutusOfBorg> yep :)
[15:14] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[15:15] <luis220413> vorlon: Can you upload a no-change rebuild of varnish-vmod-digest in Kinetic to allow varnish to migrate from the proposed pocket to the release pocket?
[15:15] <luis220413> I have tested that it builds successfully in kinetic-proposed.
[15:16] <luis220413> See bug 1979893
[15:17] <vorlon> luis220413: any Ubuntu Developer can upload such a no-change rebuild; any particular reason you're asking on ubuntu-release?
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:18] <luis220413> vorlon: doko was here around 10:00 UTC and I asked him to act on my no-change rebuild request that I emailed to him on June 26.
[15:18] <luis220413> And doko did the last no-change rebuild for this package on February 15.
[15:20] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: librist needs libmbedtls besides (ugh libmbedtls)
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh
[15:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I have to merge perl due to #1014282
[15:21]  * LocutusOfBorg goes ahead and merges perl
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> well perl is in proposed
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:24]  * LocutusOfBorg helps perl migrate then
[15:25] <vorlon> luis220413: ok, no-change rebuild uploaded
[15:25] <luis220413> vorlon: Thanks. I will close the bug for this package.
[15:27] <vorlon> luis220413: this alone does not get varinsh-modules to migrate; Debian has not taken a decision to remove the armhf binaries to let this package migrate, and I will generally not regress architecture support vs Debian
[15:28] <luis220413> vorlon: I just requested you to upload a no-change rebuild varnish-vmod-digest in Ubuntu. There is also a Debian bug asking for a no-change rebuild of this package.
[15:28] <luis220413> And varnish-modules and libvmod-re2 are pending on other Debian bugs.
[15:28] <luis220413> I want varnish to migrate because of CVE-2022-23959.
[15:30] <vorlon> why does varnish-vmod-digest depend on varnishabi-$foo but varnish-modules does not?
[15:31] <luis220413> vorlon: The version of varnish-modules in kinetic-proposed for amd64 depends on varnishabi-strict-c2c07517ddddbc187604b800eff733296e93aaad.
[15:32] <vorlon> luis220413: so varnish-modules also needs to either be updated or dropped in order for varnish to migrate
[15:32] <luis220413> vorlon: This is due to an autopkgtest failure in armhf. See bug 1979893 and the linked Debian bug
[15:33] <luis220413> vorlon: And also libvmod-re2 that is incompatible with Varnish 7.x.y
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libffi7 from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libquicktime from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added librist to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added package-notes to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added svt-av1 to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:44] <paride> hey, I was also looking at the perl related adduser autopkgtest regression: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/adduser/kinetic/i386
[15:45] <paride> I am not sure I understand the reason for that failure, but reminds of what was tackled with this hint: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/423952
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added mbedtls to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:52] <jawn-smith> paride: I was actually just coming to the same conclusion about adding a hint
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[16:02] <paride> jawn-smith, I'm unhappy because adduser passed on i386 relatively recently, see https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/adduser/kinetic/i386
[16:02] <paride> and I don't understand what's changed that makes it fail now
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[16:08] <vorlon> paride: added test dependency, not cross-installable in the i386 test environment, and adduser test failures should simply be ignored going forward because this is an arch: all package
[16:11] <paride> ok now I see it: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/commit/a636983418db335080b2f9842a49813f3774c110
[16:11] <paride> that Gbp-Dch: ignore didn't help
[16:11] <paride> thanks!
[16:24] <Eickmeyer[m]> ubuntu-release: Right now, Studio's limit is at 5GB, and that is translating to 4.7GiB for Kinetic, any chance we can bump that limit to 5 GiB? Translates to 5368709120 bytes if you need the quick math.
[16:25] <Eickmeyer[m]> We passed the limit by seeding a snap.
[16:27] <paride> well it's not really that commit that added the perl test dependency, but I put the pieces of the puzzle together. MP for adding a hint: https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/427039
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected resource-agents [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu8]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[17:26] <jawn-smith> paride: The new version of adduser (3.121ubuntu1) hasn't passed on i386 at all. So as vorlon said it's an added test dependency
[17:27] <paride> yep saw that, it wasn't really a new issue (which was my wrong underlying assumption). thanks.
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added cjson to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[18:00] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librist/0.2.7+dfsg-1/+build/24180400 had failed due to cjson also being missing, which I've addressed, but it also continues to show libmbedtls-dev as uninstallable long after it's been published; it's cross-installable locally so I'm not sure what's going on there
[18:03] <LocutusOfBorg> cache?
[18:04] <vorlon> launchpad has a more current view of the archive than the world in general, and I see the package here
[18:12] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: oh; the problem is that I'm trying to build librist in the release pocket and the mbedtls that I built for i386 is in -proposed
[18:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: retrying the mbedtls autopkgtest on ppc64el; if it still fails I can trigger a build of mbedtls in the release pocket as well
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[21:03] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: Is there a "correct" place to report autopkgtest issues?
[21:04] <jawn-smith> and to check if they're already being worked on before trying to raise an issue?
[21:04] <tsimonq2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing
[21:04] <tsimonq2> (Don't quote me on it. :) )
[21:05] <jawn-smith> Thanks!
[21:07] <tsimonq2> Of course!
[21:15] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: the link tsimonq2 posted is for the autopkgtest infrastructure as opposed to the autopkgtest package itself. So the answer is yes there is a correct place but it depends on where you are seeing the issue.
[21:17] <tsimonq2> That is also true, yes. Often times you can also find packages in the Debian BTS with the tag debci. Again, depends on where you're looking. :)
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I'm making ghc progress some bits tomorrow I hope
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4880/+packages
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe I will do it on bileto
[21:22] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: Thanks, I was looking at an infrastructure related issue so that clears it up!
[22:43] <bdmurray> jbicha: There is a release team checklist item about updating osinfo-db for the end of life of Impish it also indicates that this is something which you do. Is that correct and if so can you do it?
[23:34] <vorlon> bdmurray: iirc this is the bit that requires the EOL release to be visible on old-releases first that caused jbicha to ping us last time?
[23:36] <bdmurray> vorlon: well we should document that in the template then
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-equations [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-record-update [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-hammer [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+8.15-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-deriving [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reglang [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqprime [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.15-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-deriving [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-hammer [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+8.15-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reglang [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-equations [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-record-update [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-corn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.13.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)