[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[03:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[03:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.22.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libopusenc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (jammy-proposed/main) [42.2-0ubuntu0.2 => 42.3.1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[06:30] <jbicha> please reject gnome-shell 42.3.1-0ubuntu1 from jammy. I uploaded an updated version instead
[08:09] <laney> ✅
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libopusenc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.22.9+dfsg-1]
=== ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto
[08:43] <ricotz> doko, hi, python3-stdlib-extensions 3.10.5-2 introduced python 3.9 again?
[08:45] <ricotz> seems it is not installable as well :(
[09:15] <ricotz> -MIN_VER = 3.10.4-0ubuntu2~
[09:15] <ricotz> +MIN_VER = 3.10.4-1~
[10:01] <ricotz> please could someone take a look at python3-stdlib-extensions in kinetic-proposed, preferably removing it to allow builds relying on python to proceed?
[10:02] <ricotz> ubuntu-archive, hello ^
[10:04] <luis220413> I sent a no-change rebuild request to doko on June 26 and I did not receive a reply.
[10:05] <luis220413> The package is varnish-vmod-digest in Kinetic.
[10:05] <luis220413> See bug 1979893
[10:05] <ubottu> Bug 1979893 in varnish-modules (Debian) "Varnish modules fail to build or to install" [Unknown, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979893
[10:07] <doko> ricotz: oops, updating it again
[10:08] <apw> ricotz, looking
[10:10] <ricotz> doko, thanks
[10:10] <ricotz> apw, hi, I guess doko is fixing it
[10:13] <ricotz> doko, this still won't work with "MIN_VER = 3.10.4-1~"
[10:13] <ricotz> doko, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults
[10:18] <doko> also fixed
[10:18] <ricotz> doko, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/613553412/python3-stdlib-extensions_3.10.5-2_3.10.5-2ubuntu1.diff.gz ?
[10:19] <ricotz> ok
[10:19] <ricotz> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/613553835/python3-stdlib-extensions_3.10.5-2ubuntu1_3.10.5-2ubuntu2.diff.gz
[10:19] <ricotz> thanks!
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: raspi-config (jammy-proposed/universe) [20201027ubuntu1 => 20220506-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (raspi)
[10:50] <waveform> argh, can someone reject that raspi-config upload to jammy-proposed? I forgot it needs the orig tar force-included as I'm converting it from native to quilt (for the sake of my sanity)
[10:50] <waveform> oh ... actually, ignore me ... apparently it included the orig tar after all
[11:50] <laney> pretty sure you'll get a rejection even if it gets queued if the orig is missing
[11:50] <laney> ...kind of sure...
[11:57] <luis220413> doko: I sent you a no-change rebuild request via email on June 26 and I did not receive a reply.
[11:58] <luis220413> I want varnish-vmod-digest to be rebuilt to allow varnish to migrate from the proposed pocket to the release pocket. Note that two other packages are blocking the migration and I have requested fixes through Debian bugs.
[11:58] <luis220413> See bug 1979893
[11:58] <ubottu> Bug 1979893 in varnish-modules (Debian) "Varnish modules fail to build or to install" [Unknown, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979893
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7823 entries have been added or removed
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (jammy-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7 => 1:4.7.0-1ubuntu8] (ubuntu-server)
[13:34] <vorlon> jbicha: do you have insight into why remmina-plugin-spice was allowed to become uninstallable in kinetic, and is a fix in progress?
[13:35] <jbicha> vorlon: it is temporarily no longer built by the remmina source package. Do you use that plugin?
[13:35] <vorlon> jbicha: no, I monitor devel uninstallables ;D
[13:36] <vorlon> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/kinetic_uninst.txt
[13:36] <vorlon> so looks like this is NBS and should be manually removed
[13:36] <vorlon> thanks
[13:36] <jbicha> I don't know why it didn't show up on NBS automatically
[13:37] <vorlon> jbicha: it actually did but the NBS and uninstallable reports update at different cycles
[13:37] <vorlon> so I didn't notice this is an uninstallable package that I already removed
[13:37] <kanashiro_> SRU team: could anyone please reject the resource-agents upload to jammy-proposed? this is wrong
[13:37] <jbicha> the plugin was a casualty of the libsoup3-in-main transition. There is a good chance it won't come back in time for Kinetic but I haven't looked into how much coding work is necessary
[13:40] <vorlon> jbicha: no worries, uninstallables cleaned up so no particular action needed from my side
[13:41] <jbicha> I figured out the virt-viewer situation earlier that I was inquiring about. The phodav transition was complex but finished now & virt-viewer still works ok :)
[13:42] <vorlon> huzzah
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[14:37] <fheimes> hi SRU team, could you please have a look at s390-tools(-signed) packages in the focal unapproved queue and ideally approve? (it's stuck in the queue for quite a while) - many thx
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (bionic-proposed/main) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu4 => 2:17.0.13-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resource-agents (jammy-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7 => 1:4.7.0-1ubuntu7.1] (ubuntu-server)
[14:58] <Eickmeyer[m]> Hi SRU team! Trying to get ubuntustudio-meta (bug 1980901) in before 22.04.1 freeze. Just adds libreoffice-calc back to the meta, already added back to the seed per the FFe of the same bug.
[14:58] <ubottu> Bug 1980901 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] [FFe] libreoffice-calc erroneously missing from ubuntustudio 22.04 seed" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980901
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, svt-av1 is needed on i386 by ffmpeg...
[15:08] <LocutusOfBorg> also librist I would say...
[15:13] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: where would I see that librist is needed? is it visible in the current build log?
[15:13] <vorlon> yes it is
[15:13] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/613586504/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-i386.ffmpeg_7%3A5.0.1-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[15:13] <LocutusOfBorg> yep :)
[15:14] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[15:15] <luis220413> vorlon: Can you upload a no-change rebuild of varnish-vmod-digest in Kinetic to allow varnish to migrate from the proposed pocket to the release pocket?
[15:15] <luis220413> I have tested that it builds successfully in kinetic-proposed.
[15:16] <luis220413> See bug 1979893
[15:16] <ubottu> Bug 1979893 in varnish-modules (Debian) "Varnish modules fail to build or to install" [Unknown, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979893
[15:17] <vorlon> luis220413: any Ubuntu Developer can upload such a no-change rebuild; any particular reason you're asking on ubuntu-release?
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:18] <luis220413> vorlon: doko was here around 10:00 UTC and I asked him to act on my no-change rebuild request that I emailed to him on June 26.
[15:18] <luis220413> And doko did the last no-change rebuild for this package on February 15.
[15:20] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: librist needs libmbedtls besides (ugh libmbedtls)
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh
[15:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I have to merge perl due to #1014282
[15:21]  * LocutusOfBorg goes ahead and merges perl
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> well perl is in proposed
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:24]  * LocutusOfBorg helps perl migrate then
[15:25] <vorlon> luis220413: ok, no-change rebuild uploaded
[15:25] <luis220413> vorlon: Thanks. I will close the bug for this package.
[15:27] <vorlon> luis220413: this alone does not get varinsh-modules to migrate; Debian has not taken a decision to remove the armhf binaries to let this package migrate, and I will generally not regress architecture support vs Debian
[15:28] <luis220413> vorlon: I just requested you to upload a no-change rebuild varnish-vmod-digest in Ubuntu. There is also a Debian bug asking for a no-change rebuild of this package.
[15:28] <luis220413> And varnish-modules and libvmod-re2 are pending on other Debian bugs.
[15:28] <luis220413> I want varnish to migrate because of CVE-2022-23959.
[15:28] <ubottu> In Varnish Cache before 6.6.2 and 7.x before 7.0.2, Varnish Cache 6.0 LTS before 6.0.10, and and Varnish Enterprise (Cache Plus) 4.1.x before 4.1.11r6 and 6.0.x before 6.0.9r4, request smuggling can occur for HTTP/1 connections. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-23959>
[15:30] <vorlon> why does varnish-vmod-digest depend on varnishabi-$foo but varnish-modules does not?
[15:31] <luis220413> vorlon: The version of varnish-modules in kinetic-proposed for amd64 depends on varnishabi-strict-c2c07517ddddbc187604b800eff733296e93aaad.
[15:32] <vorlon> luis220413: so varnish-modules also needs to either be updated or dropped in order for varnish to migrate
[15:32] <luis220413> vorlon: This is due to an autopkgtest failure in armhf. See bug 1979893 and the linked Debian bug
[15:32] <ubottu> Bug 1979893 in varnish-modules (Debian) "Varnish modules fail to build or to install" [Unknown, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979893
[15:33] <luis220413> vorlon: And also libvmod-re2 that is incompatible with Varnish 7.x.y
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libffi7 from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libquicktime from i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added librist to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added package-notes to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added svt-av1 to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:44] <paride> hey, I was also looking at the perl related adduser autopkgtest regression: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/adduser/kinetic/i386
[15:45] <paride> I am not sure I understand the reason for that failure, but reminds of what was tackled with this hint: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/423952
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added mbedtls to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[15:52] <jawn-smith> paride: I was actually just coming to the same conclusion about adding a hint
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[16:02] <paride> jawn-smith, I'm unhappy because adduser passed on i386 relatively recently, see https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/adduser/kinetic/i386
[16:02] <paride> and I don't understand what's changed that makes it fail now
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[16:08] <vorlon> paride: added test dependency, not cross-installable in the i386 test environment, and adduser test failures should simply be ignored going forward because this is an arch: all package
[16:11] <paride> ok now I see it: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/adduser/-/commit/a636983418db335080b2f9842a49813f3774c110
[16:11] <ubottu> Commit a636983 in debian/adduser "Add test dependency on perl (for --remove-home)"
[16:11] <paride> that Gbp-Dch: ignore didn't help
[16:11] <paride> thanks!
[16:24] <Eickmeyer[m]> ubuntu-release: Right now, Studio's limit is at 5GB, and that is translating to 4.7GiB for Kinetic, any chance we can bump that limit to 5 GiB? Translates to 5368709120 bytes if you need the quick math.
[16:25] <Eickmeyer[m]> We passed the limit by seeding a snap.
[16:27] <paride> well it's not really that commit that added the perl test dependency, but I put the pieces of the puzzle together. MP for adding a hint: https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/427039
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected resource-agents [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu8]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[17:26] <jawn-smith> paride: The new version of adduser (3.121ubuntu1) hasn't passed on i386 at all. So as vorlon said it's an added test dependency
[17:27] <paride> yep saw that, it wasn't really a new issue (which was my wrong underlying assumption). thanks.
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added cjson to i386-whitelist in kinetic
[18:00] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librist/0.2.7+dfsg-1/+build/24180400 had failed due to cjson also being missing, which I've addressed, but it also continues to show libmbedtls-dev as uninstallable long after it's been published; it's cross-installable locally so I'm not sure what's going on there
[18:03] <LocutusOfBorg> cache?
[18:04] <vorlon> launchpad has a more current view of the archive than the world in general, and I see the package here
[18:12] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: oh; the problem is that I'm trying to build librist in the release pocket and the mbedtls that I built for i386 is in -proposed
[18:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: retrying the mbedtls autopkgtest on ppc64el; if it still fails I can trigger a build of mbedtls in the release pocket as well
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [7:5.0.1-3ubuntu1]
[21:03] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: Is there a "correct" place to report autopkgtest issues?
[21:04] <jawn-smith> and to check if they're already being worked on before trying to raise an issue?
[21:04] <tsimonq2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing
[21:04] <tsimonq2> (Don't quote me on it. :) )
[21:05] <jawn-smith> Thanks!
[21:07] <tsimonq2> Of course!
[21:15] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: the link tsimonq2 posted is for the autopkgtest infrastructure as opposed to the autopkgtest package itself. So the answer is yes there is a correct place but it depends on where you are seeing the issue.
[21:17] <tsimonq2> That is also true, yes. Often times you can also find packages in the Debian BTS with the tag debci. Again, depends on where you're looking. :)
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I'm making ghc progress some bits tomorrow I hope
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4880/+packages
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe I will do it on bileto
[21:22] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: Thanks, I was looking at an infrastructure related issue so that clears it up!
[22:43] <bdmurray> jbicha: There is a release team checklist item about updating osinfo-db for the end of life of Impish it also indicates that this is something which you do. Is that correct and if so can you do it?
[23:34] <vorlon> bdmurray: iirc this is the bit that requires the EOL release to be visible on old-releases first that caused jbicha to ping us last time?
[23:36] <bdmurray> vorlon: well we should document that in the template then
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-equations [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-record-update [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-hammer [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+8.15-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-deriving [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reglang [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqprime [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.15-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-deriving [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-hammer [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+8.15-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reglang [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-equations [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-record-update [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-corn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.13.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)