[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqprime [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.15-1] (no packageset)
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-corn [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.13.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqprime [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.15-1] (no packageset)
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-corn [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.13.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-iris [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-iris [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipe [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-equations [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-hammer [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+8.15-1] (no packageset)
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-hammer [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+8.15-1] (no packageset)
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-equations [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-record-update [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-deriving [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-record-update [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-deriving [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reglang [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reglang [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-deriving [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-reglang [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-reglang [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-deriving [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-equations [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3-8.15-2]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-hammer [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.2+8.15-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-record-update [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-equations [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3-8.15-2]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-iris [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.6.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-hammer [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.2+8.15-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-record-update [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-corn [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [8.13.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-deriving [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-hammer [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.2+8.15-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-iris [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.6.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-reglang [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqprime [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.15-1] (no packageset)
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-corn [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [8.13.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-iris [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.6.0-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqprime [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [8.15-1]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-equations [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3-8.15-2]
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-record-update [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-corn [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [8.13.0-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-equations [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3-8.15-2]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-record-update [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqprime [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [8.15-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-deriving [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-reglang [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-hammer [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.2+8.15-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-deriving [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-hammer [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.2+8.15-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-reglang [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipe [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.2.26+dfsg1-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-equations [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3-8.15-2]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqprime [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [8.15-1]
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-record-update [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqprime [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.15-1] (no packageset)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-corn [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.13.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-corn [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [8.13.0-1] (no packageset)
[03:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-extructures [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-extructures [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-extructures [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-extructures [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[03:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-extructures [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[04:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-extructures [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcrypt-openssl-guess-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.15-2] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-data-uri-to-buffer [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numberstation [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmodule-extract-version-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.115-2] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numberstation [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numberstation [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numberstation [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numberstation [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: numberstation [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[06:55] <jbicha> bdmurray: thanks, yes I need to mark the eol-date in osinfo-db. It's also helpful to know when it's moved to old-releases since that's a different step
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isc-dhcp (jammy-proposed/main) [4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.1 => 4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.2] (core)
[09:08] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, FYI I fixed codec2
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqeal [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqeal [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:07] <sergiodj> vorlon: hi, just a heads-up that rsync now B-D on python3-cmarkgfm, which means that the latter will need to be added to the i386 whitelist.  I've checked and python3-cmarkgfm's dependencies/B-D already seem to be present on i386
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-simple-io [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-corn [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [8.13.0-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-extructures [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-extructures [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-extructures [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqeal [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqprime [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [8.15-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcrypt-openssl-guess-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.15-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-data-uri-to-buffer [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.0.0-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numberstation [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numberstation [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-corn [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [8.13.0-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-extructures [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqeal [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmodule-extract-version-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.115-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numberstation [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numberstation [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-extructures [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqprime [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [8.15-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numberstation [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-extructures [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.3.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted numberstation [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[12:05] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept coq-simple-io
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqeal [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqeal [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coqeal [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fprintd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.94.2-1ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:1.94.3+tod1-0ubuntu2~22.04.01]
[12:25] <coreycb> ubuntu-archive: hello, I would like to see if we can remove python-django 2:4.0.6-1 from kinetic-proposed and stick with 2:3.2.13-1 for the time being. openstack is currently not compatible with it >= 3.2.13. https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt#L437
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.266.1]
[12:34] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: thanks for the codec2 fix :)
[12:34] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I'm working on the avifile armhf autopkgtest issue; may be related to aubio not having been rebuilt yet against new ffmpeg
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqeal [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqeal [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coqeal [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[12:36] <cpaelzer> coreycb: uuh that is painful
[12:37] <cpaelzer> coreycb: we have been working on a vast amount of dependencies already to make it django 4.0 compatible
[12:37] <cpaelzer> coreycb: what level of "not compatible" are we talking about for openstack - "working not at all" or "would be a bit of work, but could be done"
[12:37] <cpaelzer> lvoytek: ^^ please enter a discussion with coreycb
[12:38] <cpaelzer> coreycb: I'm busy at the sprint, but a bit later I'd like to ask you to get in contact with lvoytek to discuss this overall
[12:38] <coreycb> cpaelzer: not working but I don't know what the depth of it is to be honest. historically we've done this and waited on upstream to come up to speed.
[12:38] <cpaelzer> lvoytek: please let me know the outcome that you eventually agree on how to go for this cycle
[12:40] <cpaelzer> coreycb: since we are like 80% done with dependencies it would be nice if you could inquire if it is already in progress on the openstack side - just that we have all the info when making a decision
[12:40] <cpaelzer> to not throw away all that work too easily :-)
[12:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ffmpeg NBS cleanup looks like it's going to be a slog.  Lots of reverse-deps that are stuck in -proposed currently, mostly with arch-specific issues
[12:43] <vorlon> anyway, I'm kicking off no-change rebuilds to try to sort out the avifile autopkgtest failure; the current test result is useless, the stack trace is in the release version of libavcodec
[12:45] <coreycb> cpaelzer: checking, there was a thread that got no responses upstream so I'm trying to ask more directly
[12:58] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: and a lot of packages ftbfs with the new ffmpeg :/
[12:58] <vorlon> maybe some will succeed on retry after more libraries are built
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> meh
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> please have a look at coq-simple-io if possible
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I fixed the build failure
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I want to finish ocaml, while I wait for haskell to settle down
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2]
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-simple-io [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu2]
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted raspi-config [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220506-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[13:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! I'm doing a few SRU reviews today, mostly for stuff regarding .1
[13:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: did you take a look at updating python-apt etc.?
[13:23] <bdmurray> sil2100: I have not looked at python-apt yet, but I am working on ubuntu-release-upgrader.
[13:24] <sil2100> bdmurray: thank you, I owe you a beer then o/
[13:42] <mfo> sil2100, bdmurray: hey folks o/ if you have some additional SRU review cycles today, I'd like to ask for xen/focal-unapproved, it's an incremental fix for ftbfs on arm64/armhf in focal-proposed, please.  thanks!
[13:43] <sil2100> mfo: hey! Sorry I didn't manage to get to it yesterday - the mid-cycle sprint + .1-prep is taking up quite a few of my cycles
[13:43] <mfo> sil2100, no worries! i figured you were probably busy, Łucasz :) thx for letting me know
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.17]
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-quickchick [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-1] (no packageset)
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-quickchick [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-1] (no packageset)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireless-regdb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2022.06.06-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[14:07] <luis220413> mfo, sil2100: I have a security update on top of your SRU (bug 1956166)
[14:08] <luis220413> Bug 1956166 is your SRU, bug 1970507 is my security update
[14:08] <ebarretto> luis220413, your security update will have to wait the SRU to be merged first
[14:08] <ebarretto> luis220413, I'm already verifying it in the meantime
[14:09] <luis220413> ebarretto: Thanks! I just wanted to let sil2100 know about my security update.
[14:09] <lvoytek> cpaelzer: Thanks for letting me know! I am online now.
[14:09] <lvoytek> coreycb: I noticed the openstack issues in the proposed migration. The initial errors are easy to fix but it may go deeper than that. I'll take a more extensive look today
[14:09] <luis220413> ebarretto: And I also wanted to give an additional argument for the importance of this SRU
[14:10] <coreycb> lvoytek: thank you. I'm digging atm if you want to focus on other things. I'll keep you posted.
[14:11] <ebarretto> luis220413, +1
[14:12] <lvoytek> coreycb: sounds good, thanks! I'm pretty familiar with django 4 related errors at this point so lmk if you need any extra help there
[14:12] <coreycb> lvoytek: great, thank you
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireless-regdb [sync] (focal-proposed) [2022.06.06-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[14:19] <sil2100> waveform: hey! Any status update on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1923363 ?
[14:19] <sil2100> luis220413: thanks for the heads up o/
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.11 => 1:22.04.12] (core)
[14:22] <bdmurray> sil2100: ^ there is a test case missing and I'll add it after my next meeting but it should be deducible if you want to review it early
[14:25] <sil2100> bdmurray: ACK, thank you o/
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireless-regdb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2022.06.06-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[14:44] <sil2100> mwhudson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1974483 <- hey! Since you did some initial investigation, do we have any updates on openssh not being installed when opted-out?
[14:44] <sil2100> paride: ^ do you know by any chance?
[14:45] <paride> sil2100, in a call, then I'll look
[14:45] <dbungert> I think the plan is that we needed to fix the seeds
[14:49] <vorlon> Thread 1 "test1" received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
[14:49] <vorlon> 0xf6bce412 in ff_put_pixels16_neon () at src/libavcodec/arm/hpeldsp_neon.S:380
[14:49] <vorlon> 380	src/libavcodec/arm/hpeldsp_neon.S: No such file or directory.
[14:49] <vorlon> (gdb)
[14:49] <vorlon> oh great, sigbus in arm-specific code
[14:49] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ^^ avifile fyi
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> what a joy
[14:50] <LocutusOfBorg> aligment issue?
[14:52] <LocutusOfBorg> and of course that .S file didn't change between ffmpeg 4 and 5
[14:54] <vorlon> yes, alignment
[14:55] <vorlon> as for it not changing, that's not really surprising given that the test was originally crashing in libavcodec58, not libavcodec59 :P  I'm not sure what has changed to trigger the use of this code path where it wasn't before
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-remote-desktop [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.3-0ubuntu1]
[14:55] <vorlon> since avifile itself wasn't rebuilt
[15:02] <sil2100> bdmurray: I see ubuntu-release-upgrader is still in kinetic-proposed, blocked on autopkgtests - is this anything worrysome that could affect the jammy SRU?
[15:02] <sil2100> Or just general flakiness?
[15:07] <bdmurray> sil2100: I looked a bit and suspect flakiness because that shouldn't be arch specific at all
[15:08] <sil2100> bdmurray: ACK
[15:09] <sil2100> bdmurray: another question is - along with the changes mentioned in debian/changelog there's also an unmentioned change in utils/demotions.py, addin the handling of old-releases.ubuntu.com archive
[15:09] <bdmurray> that's not question
[15:10] <sil2100> This is basically a non user-functional change, but still a change that could regress runs of demotion updates for next updates. Should this have a separate bug number? Or maybe at least add a mention of it in on e of the bugs already listed?
[15:11] <sil2100> Or you think it's not needed? Guess we'd see if it's broken by having the demotions being botched - but how can we check if those got generated in a sane way?
[15:11] <bdmurray> sil2100: It was necessary as a prerequisite for fixing bug 1975533.
[15:11] <sil2100> They feel sane, but I can't say for sure by just looking at the diffs
[15:12] <sil2100> bdmurray: oh, excellent, could you add some mention about this to he bug then? Is the test case for this bug enough to make sure we didn't regress the demotion updates?
[15:17] <sil2100> Anyway, looking good from the SRU POV. I'd love if you could address those on the bug above ^
[15:17] <sil2100> But no to delay any further, I'll accept it now
[15:17] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'm having a hard time seeing how it could fail but appreciate your concerns. If we don't find the release file at archive.u.c we fall back to checking old-releases.u.c
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.12]
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-quickchick [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-1] (no packageset)
[17:02] <paride> sil2100, openssh-server is still installed even if "install server" is not selected, I'll update the bug
[17:42] <waveform> sil2100, re: LP: #1923363 it's on my list to look at this week but I haven't got to it yet
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.6]
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.6]
[17:53] <sil2100> paride: do you know if there's anyone working on it? I think mwhudson started investigating, but I'd like to know if it's on someone elses radar
[17:54] <sil2100> And if there's any solution ready
[17:55] <bdmurray> sil2100: Have you looked at bug 1980180? While there isn't an SRU yet I think they were looking for feedback on acceptability from us.
[17:58] <sil2100> bdmurray: didn't read all the context yet, I saw Robie involved earlier so was wondering if maybe he could have another look and see if his concerns are addressed
[17:58] <sil2100> rbasak: ^ did you see latest feedback on the bug?
[17:59] <bdmurray> We discussed it at the SRU team meeting and he wants the release team to make a decision as to what the flavors are empowered to do.
[17:59] <sil2100> Anyway, I'll read up the context tomorrow and see if we can get this moving
[17:59] <sil2100> Ah, okay
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-quickchick [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-1] (no packageset)
[18:00] <bdmurray> Its their installer so I think its their decision but one concern I have is if systems installed with calamares from 22.04 will be different than systems installed with calamares from 22.04.1.
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-quickchick [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-1] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-quickchick [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-quickchick [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-quickchick [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-quickchick [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted coq-quickchick [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[18:05] <bdmurray> seb128: Has the desktop team looked at bug 1981611?
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.5 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.6] (core)
[18:41] <rbasak> bdmurray: I don't remember discussing calamares - I don't think we got to that agenda item? Or did we briefly discuss it and I've just forgotten? I don't see anything in our notes.
[18:42] <rbasak> But yeah, looking at it with fresh eyes now, I think your summary is a fair reflection of my view anyway. The key thing is that it only affects the installer. If this is definitely the case, then I'm fine with letting the flavour leads figure it out, providing the release team is OK with it.
[18:44] <rbasak> This is assuming that there will be a real improvement to Ubuntu users as a result of the update.
[18:44] <bdmurray> rbasak: Given I had a note on the bug about forming an opinion on the SRU I'm quite certain we discussed it.
[18:44] <rbasak> OK, sorry I've just forgotten
[18:44] <bdmurray> sil2100: I've updated the jammy SRU bugs for ubuntu-release-upgrader.
[18:45] <rbasak> FWIW, I place very little weight on the "it's upstream LTS!" argument in the bug. But the other arguments are OK.
[18:47] <bdmurray> rbasak: Looking at the SRU team meeting for this week I wonder if we should get it officially scheduled with the sprint so we get more attendance?
[18:50] <rbasak> bdmurray: sure if you can arrange that
[18:56] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: oh wow, avifile's test case includes a check to force disabling of neon on armhf because of this issue and somehow that's failing when using libavutil from -proposed
[19:08] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok now that I'm testing right I have the test working against -proposed
[19:09] <vorlon> so yes it was actually a problem of a mix of release and -proposed libs from ffmpeg; would be ideal for ffmpeg to tighten package relationships to not let that happen
[19:10] <vorlon> because basically libavutil57 and libavcodec58 don't interoperate despite being coinstallable etc
[19:13] <luis220413> LocutusOfBorg: Please file a Debian bug to tighten the ffmpeg dependencies.
[19:21] <seb128> bdmurray, no, our rls review weekly meeting conflicted with the roadmap sprint today
[19:22] <seb128> it's unclear without investigating why that would trigger a conffile upgrade prompts, there is no reason that file should have been modified by something else on the system
[19:43] <vorlon> seb128: debian/speech-dispatcher.maintscript in the jammy version of speech-dispatcher removes /etc/speech-dispatcher/modules/mary-generic.conf but this package version also ships it
[19:46] <vorlon> analysis posted on the bug
[19:47] <seb128> vorlon, thanks
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yt-dlp (jammy-backports/universe) [2022.06.29-1~bpo22.04.1 => 2022.07.18-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:44] <Ukikie> So is there any reason to keep wireguard-linux-compat around?  That'll just cause what looks like errors (but only warnings) when installed, functionally has no use.