[00:01] <vorlon> Ukikie: make the case for its removal and blacklisting in a bug, subscribe ubuntu-archive?
[00:03] <Ukikie> Basically "Ditto, Debian #991768"
[00:03] <ubottu> Debian bug 991768 in wireguard-dkms "wireguard-dkms: useless in bullseye, in mainline kernel since linux 5.6" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/991768
[05:46] <jbicha> hi, my gnome-control-center 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 was accidentally rejected from the jammy queue. Could it be accepted instead?
[05:47] <jbicha> my original reject request was https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/07/05/%23ubuntu-release.html
[07:55] <sergiodj> hello, rsync has been sync'ed from Debian.  python3-cmarkgfm needs to be added to i386 whitelist in order to unblock it.  thank you
[08:06] <LocutusOfBorg> sergiodj, hasn't rsync been rsync'ed from Debian? :)
[08:32] <luis220413> Please review my Tor SRU in bug 1982224. It fixes 11 CVEs and a fatal bug in Bionic and Focal that does leads to rejection of relays running the version currently in Ubuntu from the Tor network.
[08:32] <ubottu> Bug 1982224 in tor (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Upgrade to 0.4.7.8 for Bionic, Focal and Jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1982224
[08:32] <luis220413> The packages should finish building in a few minutes.
[08:42] <luis220413> I returned 3 minutes after disconnecting. Any news on mySRU?
[10:44] <enyc> rbasak: Polite nudge,  xserver-xorg-video-{radeon+ati} fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1970473  ... please process for jammy-updates  whatever-it-is =)  thankyou =)
[10:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1970473 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Jammy) "[radeon] Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV when using the RADEON driver" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.3] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[10:51] <luis220413> rbasak: Please review my Tor SRU in bug 1982224. It fixes 11 CVEs and a fatal bug in Bionic and Focal that does leads to rejection of relays running the version currently in Ubuntu from the Tor network.
[10:51] <ubottu> Bug 1982224 in tor (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Upgrade to 0.4.7.8 for Bionic, Focal and Jammy" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1982224
[11:28] <rbasak> luis220413: I replied in the bug for you.
[11:28] <rbasak> Well, in bug 1837793
[11:28] <ubottu> Bug 1837793 in tor (Ubuntu) "This version of Tor (0.3.2.10) is not recommended" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1837793
[11:28] <rbasak> Why are there multiple bugs on this?
[11:29] <rbasak> I'll mark your one as a duplicate
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-tentacool-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-tentacool-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-tentacool-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-tentacool-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[12:08] <enyc> thankyou rbasak =)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-tentacool-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (jammy-proposed) [41.5-2ubuntu1]
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-tentacool-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-babak-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-babak-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[12:28] <fossfreedom> rbasak: hi there. Can I ask why the gnome-software SRU was rejected? TIA
[12:40] <rbasak> fossfreedom: the upload was bad. Please reupload with a fixed changes file (probably needs the changelog fixing)
[12:40] <rbasak> BTW, you can see the queue rejection reasons in the rejected queue
[12:41] <rbasak> Open up https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=gnome-software
[12:42] <rbasak> I try and fix these up myself sometimes, but today the queue is very big and I need to focus on that, and there are many more uploaders than SRU team members. Sorry!
[12:42] <fossfreedom> scratching my head... the bug number is in the changelog and in the patch dep3 header
[12:46] <amurray> fossfreedom: do you need a space between LP: and the #bugnumber?
[12:47] <fossfreedom> Oh
[12:47] <fossfreedom> Grrr
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal (jammy-proposed/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu2~22.04.1] (desktop-core)
[13:03] <oSoMoN> ^ this SRU will be needed for 22.04.1
[13:04] <oSoMoN> (I'm reformatting the bug to adhere to the SRU template)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (jammy-proposed/main) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:13] <jbicha> I've done a reupload of gnome-control-center since the original version was accidentally rejected
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.6]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-babak-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.5-2 => 41.5-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, xubuntu)
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.5-2 => 41.5-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-budgie, xubuntu)
[14:12] <jbicha> could you reject gnome-software 41.5-2ubuntu1? ubuntu2 better matches what's in our VCS (cc @fossfreedom)
[14:12] <bdmurray> jbicha: for the record packages can be accepted from the rejected queue
[14:12] <bdmurray> jbicha: so reuploading is unnecessary
[14:13] <jbicha> bdmurray: yes, but this way shows on your queue easier :)
[14:14] <bdmurray> That is true
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted genshi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu3.1]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (jammy-proposed) [41.5-2ubuntu1]
[15:23] <seb128> rbasak, if you still have some SRU time today could you review xdg-desktop-portal/J and perhaps gnome-control-center/J? the first one we need for .1 since we told mozilla we would have it working, gnome-control-center we would also like to try to get in for .1
[15:55] <enyc> Hrrm....  Any $idea  why  xserver-xorg-video-radeon  xserver-xorg-video-ati  updates might not be selected by default for update, even if shown in apt-cache and so-on ?
[15:56] <enyc> I seem to have to manually  install xserver-xorg-video-radeon=1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-ati=1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1   .....
[15:56] <enyc> maybe some process re-orders them in packages.gz and whatever  once sure uploaded to all mirrors or something
[15:57] <enyc> seems to want to hold them back by default somehow
[16:03] <rbasak> enyc: phasing
[16:04] <rbasak> apt itself supports phasing since Jammy IIRC
[16:10] <bdmurray> I didn't see that package in the phased-updates report though
[16:18] <rbasak> The report seems quite short. Is that expected?
[16:25] <vorlon> yes, when there are not problems, packages move quickly through the phasing (10% every 6 hours, so 100% in 2.5 days)
[16:28] <enyc> rbasak: Thankyou -- that would explain weird apt behaviour, neither package seeming to override as 'newer' and all that..
[16:28] <rbasak> I released this package only a few hours ago
[16:28] <rbasak> Maybe the phased updater report hasn't updated yet?
[16:29] <enyc> bdmurray: where is this 'phased-updates' report?
[16:30] <vorlon> rbasak: yeah the report only updates once every 6 hours
[16:30] <rbasak> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html
[16:30] <vorlon> the reporting, and the updating of the phasing, happen in the same job
[16:30] <enyc> thankyou
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, haskell stuff (at least haskell-abstract-par) is building if I do export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> is that ok for you?
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I can add it on hlibrary.mk
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> and also in Debian with that flag enabled the build fails...
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> but should I add it regardless of the architecture?
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> before uploading haskell-devscripts I would like to hear your opinion, I don't understand the consequences of this change
[16:34] <enyc> hrrm, apt and apt-get  manpages no info on phasing!
[16:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I don't have any specific reservations about that if it's what's required for building.  It does change how symbols are resolved between objects vs internal to objects, but I'm not sure to what extent that would matter in haskell land
[16:43] <LocutusOfBorg> I did upload it on my ppa
[16:43] <LocutusOfBorg> will upload lvl1 haskell stuff there and see results
[16:44] <LocutusOfBorg> btw doing export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
[16:44] <LocutusOfBorg>  in a mk file used as library is a sad thing to do
[16:44] <LocutusOfBorg> I wonder if it overrides what might be in rules file
[16:46] <LocutusOfBorg> btw this is the missing bit for ocaml migration I think https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015758
[16:46] <ubottu> Debian bug 1015758 in src:ocaml-odoc "ocaml-odoc: autopkgtests failures" [Serious, Open]
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-canvas-confetti [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1+~1.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19-2] (no packageset)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19-2] (no packageset)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.14.4-1ubuntu2~22.04.1]
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19-2] (no packageset)
[18:21] <rbasak> seb128: sorry I'm quite far past EOD now, but I reviewed and accepted xdg-desktop-portal for you at least. Hope that's OK.
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-atd [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-atd [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-atd [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-atd [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-atd [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:59] <seb128> rbasak, great, thank you! and sorry for making you do reviews after hours
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-atd [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[20:14] <bdmurray> jbicha: Have you looked at the halted phasing of gnome-remote-desktop for Jammy? This'll likely become an issue for the point release.
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.5-0ubuntu1 => 2.13.8-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (jammy-proposed/main) [2.17.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.17.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (focal-proposed/main) [20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (no packageset)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19-2] (no packageset)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.19-2] (no packageset)
[21:20] <seb128> bdmurray, how so? the iso is built with the current version in any case no?
[21:21] <bdmurray> seb128: I believe the new policy is to look at updates which are not fully phased and make a choice about phasing them or pulling them. It stopped phasing due to a potential regression so we wouldn't want to include that on an image.
[21:22] <seb128> bdmurray, that's the first time I read about that, was it ever communicated to teams/project lists/...?
[21:23] <seb128> bdmurray, also I would expect to see such issues discussed with stakeholders and not being ping to individual uploaders
[21:25] <bdmurray> seb128: It was not communicated, I'm fairly certain this is the first point release since we decided on it but ICBW. Regardless, will sending an email to ubuntu-devel work for you?
[21:26] <seb128> yes, thanks
[21:28] <seb128> bdmurray, I'm going to check on gnome-remote-desktop, Jeremy is at debconf this week so I'm unsure how much he's around. It does feel like we need a more defined  process if we are talking about excluding SRUs from milestones though because that might be unexpected to teams who assume that SRU to updates will be delivered as part of the milestone
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bedtools (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.30.0+dfsg-2 => 2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[21:45] <rbasak> FWIW, I don't think it should be surprising that if a phasing stop occurred that looks valid, then the release team are questioning whether that should be in the point release.
[21:46] <rbasak> The SRU team might even decide to upload a revert of a regression regardless of the point release.
[21:46] <seb128> rbasak, I disagree with that statement
[21:46] <seb128> it never happened before so it is surprising
[21:47] <seb128> I don't think it's wrong or shouldn't be done, but it's a change and there was no communication about it
[21:53] <rbasak> seb128: sure, earlier communication might have helped. But if the decision were being made today rather than in the past, I think it would still be valid.
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsyntax-keyword-multisub-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.02-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libutil-h2o-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.18-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-unicoq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.6-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reduction-effects [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-gappa [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: journal-brief [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.1.8-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnet-amazon-signature-v4-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.21-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-pprint [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220103-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-protobuf-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tinyvec-macros [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tree-magic-db [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: synphot [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-polymodels [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librole-hooks-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.008-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rust-embed-utils [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [7.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sunpy-sphinx-theme [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.2.32-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmodule-build-pluggable-cpanfile-perl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.05-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tinyvec [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-capnp [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.14.7-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-gappa [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flake8-black [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtfeedback-opensource-src [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0~git20180903.a14bd0b-4] (qt5)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-smithay-clipboard [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-unicoq [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.6-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: onionprobe [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.0+ds-2] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xyzservices [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2022.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-reduction-effects [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-capnp [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.14.7-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-pprint [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [20220103-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-protobuf-support [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aegisub [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.2+dfsg-6.3] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-interval [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rust-embed-utils [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [7.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tinyvec-macros [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tree-magic-db [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-smithay-clipboard [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tinyvec [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-interval [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsyntax-keyword-multisub-perl [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.02-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-indexed-traversable [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: synphot [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-string-qq [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-compat [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aegisub [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.2+dfsg-6.3] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aegisub [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.2+dfsg-6.3] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aegisub [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.2.2+dfsg-6.3] (no packageset)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: htslib (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10.2-3 => 1.10.2-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-pprint [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [20220103-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-protobuf-support [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: coq-unicoq [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6-8.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-capnp [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.14.7-1] (no packageset)