| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencascade [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencascade [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 00:03 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I merged the nvidia fix to ubuntu/jammy | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| vorlon | bdmurray: ack | 00:05 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: string fix pushed | 00:06 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: and I'll go ahead and rebase it | 00:06 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I changed the changelog entry - sorry | 00:06 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: How do you want to proceed with the upload / sru-review? | 00:09 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: well cross-reviewing the SRU would be a little weird, are we better off leaving it for Europe to review? | 00:10 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: Yeah, that sounds reasonable. Do you want to the pre-build and upload? | 00:11 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: I can, yes | 00:12 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: ack, thanks. I'm gonna run to the store then | 00:12 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: before you go | 00:12 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: I see you approved it /before/ I updated the strings and rebased, do you care about re-reviewing? | 00:13 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 00:13 |
| vorlon | any problems ought to be caught in the SRU queue but maybe we don't want to wait that long | 00:13 |
| vorlon | sil2100: ohai | 00:13 |
| vorlon | sil2100: do you have time for reviewing this if I upload it now? Then bdmurray can get to the store | 00:14 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: sure | 00:14 |
| vorlon | sil2100: ok. I still have to write the SRU template but maybe I can get the code uploaded for your review first | 00:15 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I'd seen the updated strings but not the changelog change. Anyway I still approve | 00:15 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: you go to the store, I'll do the sru-review part since it never hurts to have a third pair of eyes on it | 00:19 |
| vorlon | sil2100: fwiw a little delayed, pre-build.sh was not run before final commit on either of our branches and I'm cleaning up linting errors | 00:20 |
| vorlon | de-linted, now waiting for pre-build to finish | 00:24 |
| sil2100 | I'm ready o/ | 00:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openconnect [source] (jammy-proposed) [8.20-1ubuntu0.1] | 00:35 | |
| vorlon | SRU template for LP: #1977493 written before pre-build has completed. :P | 00:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1977493 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Upgrade from Ubuntu 21.10 to 22.04 fails - unmet dependencies: libpam-modules" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1977493 | 00:42 |
| vorlon | seems like it's being unpleasantly slow to download indices via apt | 00:43 |
| vorlon | for demotions.py | 00:43 |
| vorlon | got faster when I disconnected from the VPN but still taking forever. An 'apt update' here is trivially fast in comparison | 00:44 |
| vorlon | ah it has to download Contents, maybe that's why? | 00:45 |
| vorlon | still - not reasonable | 00:46 |
| sil2100 | I don't remember if I ever ran pre-build on ubuntu-release-upgrader, so not sure how long it was usually taking | 00:48 |
| vorlon | sil2100: it's running, it's being obscenely slow, I don't have a good way to debug the performance issues right now; so I'm going afk for a little bit to eat dinner. I expect to be back in < 30m | 00:49 |
| sarnold | perf top can be helpful for a quick 'what the heck is this doing' kindof view, if you weren't planning on it and don't have anything better set up | 00:50 |
| sil2100 | hm, okay, this might be a bit too late for me, since it's already 3 at night here | 00:51 |
| sarnold | gn8 sil2100 :) | 00:51 |
| sil2100 | If anything I can always review+accept it tomorrow morning | 00:52 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 00:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencascade [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 01:38 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: its generating demotions for every upgrade path which might not be necessary given things aren't getting demoted in jammy? | 01:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.12 => 1:22.04.13] (core) | 01:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencascade [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 01:48 | |
| RAOF | Hrm. OEM would like to release linux-firmware 1.187.33 into focal-updates so they can spin an image today. This fixes #1981922, which also applies to jammy, and has an SRU ready to be released into jammy-updates. | 02:18 |
| RAOF | However: 22.04.1 point release freeze. | 02:18 |
| vorlon | RAOF: I think it's ok to release to focal before releasing to jammy | 02:19 |
| vorlon | the SRU is *present* in jammy-proposed, so it's not going to fall off the radar | 02:19 |
| RAOF | Yup. | 02:20 |
| RAOF | My concern was that the point release is also where we start suggesting upgrades, so we could fix someone's suspend/resume, then suggest they upgrade to 22.04 which will break their suspend/resume. | 02:21 |
| RAOF | But as long as we release the jammy-proposed one promptly, there's not a huge window for that. | 02:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencascade [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] | 02:21 | |
| vorlon | RAOF: right, so I think this should be on the list for us to release in jammy as soon as images are finalized | 02:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencascade [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] | 02:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dh-nss [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1] | 02:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencascade [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] | 02:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencascade [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] | 02:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted junit5-system-exit [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.2-1] | 02:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencascade [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [7.6.3+dfsg1-2] | 02:22 | |
| vorlon | RAOF: also, hi! if you would like to review the ubuntu-release-upgrader SRU in the jammy-proposed queue, perhaps this would accelerate us being ready to turn on upgrades :) | 02:22 |
| RAOF | vorlon: Do we have such a list somewhere? (I'm not across the entirety of the release process) | 02:22 |
| RAOF | Certainly, sir! | 02:22 |
| vorlon | RAOF: AFAIK the list is currently empty and the variable has been deleted ;P | 02:22 |
| RAOF | Top hole! | 02:23 |
| vorlon | RAOF: however, bdmurray is on the lever for turning on upgrades, so flagging it to him ^^ | 02:23 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: do you know if anyone looked at why jammy desktop images are oversized? | 02:30 |
| RAOF | vorlon: Does `.pytest_cache` really want to be added in that upload? | 02:38 |
| vorlon | RAOF: nope. feel free to reject and I'll reupload | 02:38 |
| vorlon | did git tell me this was added ? of course not | 02:39 |
| RAOF | There also seems to be a bunch of .pyc shipped elsewhere, but that appears to be the case with the package in the archive, too? | 02:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.13] | 02:40 | |
| vorlon | hah spectacular | 02:40 |
| RAOF | Python packaging must have changed since last I touched it. | 02:40 |
| vorlon | the .pyc should not be shipped in the actual binary packages, and their presence in the source tarball are a side effect of us not using gbp for the builds because it's terrible? | 02:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.12 => 1:22.04.13] (core) | 02:42 | |
| vorlon | __pycache__ is in .gitignore, which is sensible. but debuild -i -I does not clean it and neither does anything else. gbp would, but gbp is awful | 02:42 |
| * RAOF hasn't really had a problem with gbp, but I've also not tried to do anything remotely fancy. | 02:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.13] | 02:43 | |
| vorlon | maybe they've cleaned it up and I should give it another chance | 02:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.12 => 1:22.04.13] (core) | 02:45 | |
| vorlon | RAOF: ^^ hopefully that's clean | 02:45 |
| RAOF | Much nicer! | 02:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:22.04.13] | 02:48 | |
| RAOF | I wonder if we should have some SRU tooling around checking translations? There's a lot of diff there, and any signal (translations that are now missing, mostly) is really difficult to extract. | 02:48 |
| vorlon | RAOF: by missing translations, do you mean regressed translations? I would grep for '^-msgstr "[^"]|^\+#.*fuzzy' (which, effectively, I did) | 04:29 |
| RAOF | Hm, yeah. That'd do it. | 04:29 |
| * RAOF ponders adding that to `sru-review` | 04:31 | |
| RAOF | After getting stuff from the shops. | 04:31 |
| tsimonq2 | Will have that livecd-rootfs fix uploaded by about Europe EOD. | 06:19 |
| schopin | Anyone knows of a way to point do-release-upgrade from focal to the upgrader in jammy-proposed? -p will currently fail as Jammy isn't available yet, -d will point to jammy-updates, and those flags are mutually exclusive. | 09:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dotnet6 [source] (jammy-proposed) [6.0.107-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] | 09:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 09:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/restricted) [515.65.01-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 09:53 | |
| sil2100 | schopin: yeah, it's tricky, I don't know the details but we did ask Brian about some test-cases for those as he was usually doing them. Please see the test case Steve wrote no https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1977493 as inspiration | 09:53 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1977493 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "Upgrade from Ubuntu 21.10 to 22.04 fails - unmet dependencies: libpam-modules" [Medium, Fix Committed] | 09:53 |
| schopin | sil2100: thanks, I'll amend my test cases and will do a proper verif (I've used the git tree so far) | 09:59 |
| sil2100 | schopin: thank you :) | 10:07 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, I'd like as much testing of the ubuntu-release-upgrader package as possible | 10:07 |
| schopin | hmm, one scenario I haven't tested yet is nvidia machine using nouveau. I'll add it to my list :) | 10:11 |
| utkarsh2102 | hey. Can we release google-guest-agent SRU, please? cf: LP: #1959392. | 10:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1959392 in google-guest-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) "Please update to 20220622.00 upstream release" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1959392 | 10:42 |
| utkarsh2102 | racb: ^^ (since you're on duty today) | 10:43 |
| rbasak | Will this affect the point release? | 10:53 |
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph-iscsi [source] (focal-proposed) [3.4-0ubuntu2.2] | 11:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu5] | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected net-snmp [source] (focal-proposed) [5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu2.4] | 11:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet6 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.0.107-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (no packageset) | 12:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: protobuf-c (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-1ubuntu0.1 => 1.3.3-1ubuntu0.2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 12:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected protobuf-c [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.3-1ubuntu0.1] | 12:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted protobuf-c [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.3-1ubuntu0.2] | 12:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-1ubuntu2] | 12:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted net-snmp [source] (focal-proposed) [5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu2.5] | 12:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magnumclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.11.0-0ubuntu6] | 13:11 | |
| vorlon | schopin: "nvidia machine using nouveau" should look the same as any non-nvidia system to the upgrader | 14:28 |
| vorlon | rbasak, utkarsh2102: google-guest-agent doesn't affect the point release because although google-guest-agent is included in a cloud image, cloud images are released continuously and do not participate in the point releases | 14:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dotnet6 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [6.0.107-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] | 15:09 | |
| bdmurray | Maybe we should just make a meta-release-lts-development-proposed file | 15:38 |
| foka | Hello! I noticed that hugo in Ubuntu kinetic is stuck at 0.92.2-1 when it has been at 0.101.0-1 in Debian since the end of June / early July. | 15:47 |
| bdmurray | The new version is in kinetic-proposed | 15:48 |
| bdmurray | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#hugo | 15:49 |
| bdmurray | Missing build dependencies: golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go-dev (>= 1.43.5) from Launchpad | 15:49 |
| foka | It seems to be due to the fact that newer versions of golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go, which hugo 0.101.0-1 depends on, is not being sync'ed from Debian, | 15:49 |
| foka | bdmurray: Thank you for your quick response, and thanks in advance from looking into it. :-) | 15:50 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith is on +1 migration today and might be able to look into hugo not migrating | 15:53 |
| vorlon | well he's TIL on the package in question | 15:53 |
| bdmurray | So +2 reasons for him to look at it! | 15:53 |
| jawn-smith | I'll get on that! | 15:53 |
| === tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed | ||
| foka | Thank you so much bdmurray vorlon jawn-smith! :-D | 15:55 |
| foka | By the way, what does "TIL" mean? (Sorry for my newbie question!) | 15:55 |
| jawn-smith | "Touched it last" | 15:55 |
| foka | Oh, haha! That's cute! I'll remember that and maybe start using that term at work with my colleagues! Thanks! | 15:57 |
| tsimonq2 | (Not to be confused with Today I Learned, would suggest #debian-til on OFTC :) ) | 15:58 |
| foka | Speaking of migration, I am a bit concerned about the regressions with golang-golang-x-net, and it is causing regressions on Debian too... https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-golang-x-net Hope that won't cause too much trouble. | 15:59 |
| foka | tsimonq2: Haha! Nice! | 16:00 |
| foka | jawn-smith: Wow! golang-1.19 1.19-1! Thank you so much for the upload! Hurray! (I've been away and just started catching up. :-) ) | 16:01 |
| jawn-smith | Sure np! I'm working on getting it uploaded to Ubuntu today as well | 16:02 |
| tsimonq2 | (We use Hugo a loooooot for $dayjob, so if something ends up not working lmk :) ) | 16:03 |
| jawn-smith | Will do. I suspect this might be related to the deprecation of SHA1 in Go >= 1.18. If I'm right it's a test-only patch | 16:04 |
| foka | tsimonq2: Woohoo! So happy Hugo is an integral part of your $dayjob! | 16:10 |
| foka | jawn-smith: Great insight! So happy that you are on top of these things! | 16:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Jammy 22.04.1] (2218669216) has been added | 16:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dnspython [source] (focal-proposed) [1.16.0-1ubuntu1] | 16:35 | |
| jbicha | could we build libavif and its dependency libgav1 on i386? it's wanted by libgd2. Let me know if there's a better place I should make this request. | 18:37 |
| jawn-smith | foka, tsimonq2: Got hugo successfully built. | 18:51 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Guys, I just realized something. Ubuntu Studio and Kubuntu originally had the "Get New Stuff" feature work (at least I know it worked for me). But lately I've been seeing many reports about an "Invalid number of concurrent steams" error when trying to use that feature, and I got it myself once. I think we should check that, I'm going to be testing it shortly. | 18:52 |
| foka | jawn-smith: Hurray! That was quick! Thank you so much! | 18:52 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | arraybolt3: That's a feature specific to the plasma desktop, probably best to talk about that in #kubuntu-devel:libera.chat . | 18:53 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Eickmeyer: True, but I think it's a regression in 22.04.1 from 22.04. | 18:53 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Thus why I brought it here. | 18:54 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | arraybolt3: Awesome, and I know everyone appreciates the heads-up. Let's narrow-down a component there, and I'm sure RikMills would also like to narrow it down as well. | 18:56 |
| arraybolt3[m] | 👍️ Once the test is done I'll take it to -devel (mid-Kylin test right now and this system is finicky with multiple VM installs at once). | 18:56 |
| tsimonq2 | jawn-smith: Thank you so much! | 19:01 |
| jawn-smith | You're welcome! | 19:01 |
| tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: I'm at the stage where the bug is reproducible on my local system and I'm iterating. Shouldn't be too much longer. | 19:01 |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: ack | 19:19 |
| arraybolt3[m] | OK, panic averted, the bug is in the original 22.04 ISO of Kubuntu. | 19:20 |
| sil2100 | phew | 19:25 |
| sil2100 | Wimpy: hello helloooo | 19:26 |
| arraybolt3[m] | sil2100: What's weird is the feature worked once in Ubuntu Studio 22.04 when I very first installed it, so Idk what happened (maybe something changed on KDE's servers that broke it). | 19:26 |
| sil2100 | Wimpy: do you think you and the MATE team would have some time for Ubuntu Mate testing? :) | 19:27 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | arraybolt3: Awesome, glad it's nothing on our end. | 19:35 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 19:48 |
| tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: The thing I'm currently struggling with is manually blacklisting all of the dependencies pulled in by those two packages. You don't happen to have a list on you? I'm zsyncing your Jammy daily now to see what all gets removed when removing those two. | 19:50 |
| tsimonq2 | I have the syntax down and in the right place, though. | 19:51 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Simon Quigley: The problem is that even if it's manually blacklisted in the seed, it'll get pulled-in by the old metapackage in -release, even if it's been fixed in -updates. | 19:52 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | So, I'm not following you. | 19:52 |
| tsimonq2 | There's a grep-dctrl command that actually pulls the package list from the task | 19:53 |
| tsimonq2 | I'm manually adding a conditional for ubuntustudio-dvd which adds those two packages to the arguments to not include | 19:54 |
| tsimonq2 | However, it still pulls in all of those dependencies | 19:54 |
| tsimonq2 | I'm not talking about the task blacklist here. Deeper than that | 19:54 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | I see. | 19:54 |
| tsimonq2 | oh I know! | 19:56 |
| tsimonq2 | lxd container, try to install it and see what it pulls in | 19:56 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | v4l2loopback-dkms depends: dkms | 19:56 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | v4l2loopback-utils depends: sudo, gstreamer1.0-tools, v4l-utils; recommends: v4l2loopback-dkms | v4l2loopback-modules | 19:56 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Simon Quigley: ^ | 19:56 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Fairly simple depends, actually. | 19:56 |
| tsimonq2 | dkms gstreamer1.0-tools libv4l-0 libv4l2rds0 libv4lconvert0 linux-headers-5.15.0-43 linux-headers-5.15.0-43-generic linux-headers-generic v4l-utils v4l2loopback-dkms v4l2loopback-utils | 19:58 |
| tsimonq2 | Not worrying about Linux headers | 19:58 |
| tsimonq2 | Not worrying about gstreamer | 19:58 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Yeah, literally what I just wrote. | 19:58 |
| tsimonq2 | So just the rest | 19:58 |
| tsimonq2 | Looks like we concur :) | 19:58 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | kek | 19:58 |
| tsimonq2 | kek | 19:59 |
| tsimonq2 | anyway | 19:59 |
| hellsworth | hey folks, I posted some videos about Kylin staying in Chinese. I'd love to hear how you all got it to switch to English though :) | 20:03 |
| hellsworth | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntukylin/+bug/1983418 | 20:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1983418 in Ubuntu Kylin "Installer does not change language" [Undecided, New] | 20:03 |
| tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: I'll be back in a few to test my fix. Probably just going to try swapping out the squashfs in the Jammy daily. Fun stuff. | 20:06 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | ew. | 20:06 |
| tsimonq2 | (Building the squashfs with my prototype fix now) | 20:06 |
| hellsworth | jbicha: pointed out my mistake and I've marked the bug invalid. so sorry. | 20:07 |
| tsimonq2 | hellsworth: Thanks regardless, we were just talking about it in #lubuntu-devel :) | 20:07 |
| vorlon | jbicha: right place to ask; in general please tag ubuntu-archive for surch requests so it doesn't get missed | 20:23 |
| vorlon | jbicha: also you seem to need an MIR? | 20:24 |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: livecd-rootfs> Would you happen to be around in a few hours to help fast-track this SRU? May be too late for European folks. | 20:24 |
| tsimonq2 | (I'll fill it out and upload it like a normal SRU.) | 20:25 |
| vorlon | jbicha: so maybe you should do a first pass on the MIR first, since if the MIR gets rejected I'll just end up having to delete the i386 binaries again | 20:25 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: yes. upload eta? | 20:26 |
| tsimonq2 | ~=< 2h | 20:26 |
| jbicha | vorlon: libgd-dev is in component-mismatches-proposed for demotion to universe. Not sure why the -dev has dependencies the library doesn't though. | 20:26 |
| vorlon | jbicha: aha, demoting then | 20:53 |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: I don't think I'm comfortable fast-tracking anything into .1 one day before release | 21:05 |
| sil2100 | JFYI | 21:05 |
| sil2100 | So I hope you don't want to get it into a respin? | 21:06 |
| tsimonq2 | sil2100: To be fair, this change only affects Ubuntu Studio and is per the request of their release manager. Eickmeyer may be able to chime in. | 21:06 |
| vorlon | sil2100: this was entirely about getting a respin of UbuntuStudio | 21:07 |
| tsimonq2 | If the fix works as intended (I'm testing it right now), and the only flavor it affects agrees, I'm confused on what the holdup is. | 21:07 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | So long as this fixes the problem with the v4l2loopback-* packages still getting pulled-in, yes. | 21:07 |
| vorlon | sil2100: livecd-rootfs misbuilds UbuntuStudio and causes inclusion of packages that have been removed from the seed/metapackage, and causes install failures on any modern PCs in the default configuration; obviously an upload sooner would have been better, but the respin is justified | 21:09 |
| sil2100 | I know the problem, but as the lead for .1 I would like to be involved in making the decision | 21:09 |
| vorlon | ack | 21:09 |
| sil2100 | So it seems that we 'dodged a bullet' since the security team was asking me in the morning if they can start releasing security updates, and since I did not plan any respins, I was close to saying 'go ahead' | 21:10 |
| sil2100 | But I told them to wait till tomorrow just-in-case | 21:10 |
| vorlon | have you already snapshotted the archive? | 21:11 |
| sil2100 | Yes | 21:11 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Just chiming in to say I'll be happy to put Simon Quigley's work through the furnace to see if it holds up under Lubuntu's test suite on my hardware. | 21:12 |
| arraybolt3[m] | (I'm sure there's plenty of other testers who will be involved, too.) | 21:13 |
| RikMills[m] | <arraybolt3[m]> "Guys, I just realized something...." <- This fix for that is in Qt, and it has been in the archive updates pocket for weeks | 21:14 |
| RikMills[m] | s/This/The/ | 21:14 |
| sil2100 | Okay, maybe I did overreact a bit here, since I do have confidence in Studio testing, but I *hate it* that once again we're dealing with last-minute-point-release fixes, fast-tracking those one day before release | 21:14 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Rik Mills: So it's already fixed and everyone's just not updating? I reported it after yet another user in #kubuntu asked about it. | 21:15 |
| vorlon | sil2100: I could save the current images as a fallback, let the SRU through, take a separate snapshot with just livecd-rootfs added, and the final decision could be made based on test results? | 21:15 |
| sil2100 | hm, do we need to snapshot livecd-rootfs? | 21:16 |
| vorlon | sil2100: the point of the snapshot is reproducibility of the point release :) | 21:16 |
| sil2100 | Since sadly we did get a new linux-riscv kernel into -updates yesterday, by accident of the kernel team | 21:16 |
| sil2100 | So we'd have to tinker the snapshot manually somehow to not include the new riscv kernel | 21:16 |
| vorlon | should we roll that back, accept livecd-rootfs, snapshot, roll linux-riscv forward? | 21:16 |
| RikMills[m] | arraybolt3[m]: LP: #1980210 | 21:17 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1980210 in qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] Unable download from store.kde.org with error 'invalid number of concurrent streams'" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980210 | 21:17 |
| tsimonq2 | sil2100: Oh, believe me, me too. I'm not sure if you saw my email but: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2022-August/005454.html | 21:17 |
| sil2100 | Sorry, those were linux-starfive kernels actually | 21:17 |
| arraybolt3[m] | RikMills[m]: \o/ and I won't raise another alarm after a user report without verifying it myself. | 21:18 |
| vorlon | sil2100: let me know how you'd like to proceed; regardless I have time for the SRU review | 21:19 |
| vorlon | (and targeted respins etc) | 21:19 |
| sil2100 | Please allow me to be a little bit bitter right now | 21:19 |
| vorlon | sil2100: here have a negroni | 21:20 |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: I saw the e-mail, but I did not see anyone from the release team nor SRU team officially 'ACKing' a fast-track of a package so late in the .1 cycle, at least not via e-mail (and I don't remember the case on IRC at least, but maybe my memory is weary) | 21:21 |
| sil2100 | Just to be clear: I'm fine with going ahead with it *right now* | 21:21 |
| vorlon | sil2100: I did discuss on IRC with them that livecd-rootfs was the right way to get it fixed; I did not communicate any deadlines, sorry | 21:22 |
| sil2100 | What I'm bitter about is the process in how this was handled. The release team is responsible for the point-release preparations, so any out-of-process actions should require an explicit ACK, especially that the build process is very fragile and we need to keep everything in sync | 21:23 |
| tsimonq2 | I apologize if there was any miscommunication on my end as well, I know I discussed it with vorlon but I haven't kept up with who holds which hats these days. | 21:24 |
| sil2100 | I did not see anyone reaching out to the release team asking: "Is it fine for me to prepare the fix and us fast-tracking it?", this seemed more like "Okay, I'll prep the changes and we'll fast-track it" | 21:24 |
| sil2100 | If vorlon did make an explicit call about that, then it's on me for missing that | 21:24 |
| sil2100 | Okay, I stop being bitter now. Let's get this change prepared, reviewed and see where to go from there | 21:26 |
| vorlon | I assumed it was a foregone conclusion that the existing UbuntuStudio image was unreleasable for 22.04.1 as-is with the current bug, now that the bug in question was known; and failed to communicate it explicitly | 21:27 |
| tsimonq2 | I'm not going to just throw a diff at you guys and expect magic to happen, I'm still finishing my testing, but here's what I'm thinking tentatively: https://pastebin.com/MV23Zd4X | 21:29 |
| tsimonq2 | My understanding is that it was going to be slightly hacky regardless. | 21:29 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | FWIW, I'm sorry this wasn't caught sooner. | 21:31 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: well, this was *not* a regression. 22.04 had the same problem and this was the first report I have heard of it | 21:31 |
| sil2100 | This is why even though it is a critical bug, I did not consider it a release blocker. It should have been fixed, yes, and we tried to do it with the simple meta change which was anyway fast-tracked, but we didn't | 21:32 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: uh that is not at all clear to me and not what I was expecting; I was expecting an 'apt-get autoremove purge -y v4l2loopback-$thing' somewhere towards the end of the build | 21:32 |
| vorlon | I guess this is the part of the code that Laney pointed you to earlier; but still it's a lot hackier than I was expecting | 21:33 |
| sil2100 | I'd really prefer some workaround that has a minimal regression potential. The last thing we want is to introduce a regression on top of the fix | 21:33 |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: This just ensures they aren't even installed in the first place, which uses less compute power. That's the way I'd look at it at least. | 21:33 |
| tsimonq2 | I could explicitly do it for the ubuntustudio-video task? | 21:34 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: I think that's premature optimization, vs the cost of humans trying to read the code | 21:34 |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: Fair point. I'll continue iterating and get back to you shortly | 21:34 |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: Am I at least on the right track? https://pastebin.com/Y5TUpNYZ | 21:53 |
| tsimonq2 | ah, I see the error it's giving me... still | 21:54 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: I'm not sure because I think remove_package is only used on images that have multiple squashfs layers and remove packages in some of them, so I cannot vouch for the behavior of that code | 21:56 |
| tsimonq2 | yeah that's what I'm figuring out | 21:56 |
| vorlon | I recently added a code change in kinetic to remove a package from cloud images and I did it in a chroot hook rather than touching any of that | 21:56 |
| tsimonq2 | Jammy or Kinetic? | 21:57 |
| tsimonq2 | ah sorry | 21:57 |
| * tsimonq2 learns how to read and slows down... | 21:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libavif to i386-whitelist in kinetic | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libgav1 to i386-whitelist in kinetic | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: limnoria (jammy-backports/universe) [2022.3.17-1 => 2022.6.23-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 22:00 | |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: https://pastebin.com/6uminbBu much more like your fix | 22:05 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: do you need to mark the script executable? | 22:07 |
| vorlon | also 'exit 0' is superfluous | 22:08 |
| tsimonq2 | ack to the latter, looking into the former, thanks | 22:08 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: the existing ones in the tree for ubuntu-cpc are, and that's not by accident | 22:09 |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: None of the groups in this particular section do that, though. I can do it just in case? | 22:09 |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: also, syntax error in the pastebin, missing space before ]! | 22:09 |
| tsimonq2 | ack | 22:09 |
| sil2100 | (I noticed as I made the same mistake already in exactly livecd-rootfs code ;p ) | 22:10 |
| tsimonq2 | https://pastebin.com/Z3kQMqmW | 22:10 |
| tsimonq2 | sil2100: Experience is a good teacher, thanks ;) | 22:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dh-python (focal-backports/universe) [4.20191017ubuntu7 => 5.20220403~bpo20.04.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 22:11 | |
| Ukikie | queuebot: Snitches get stitches. | 22:24 |
| vorlon | tsimonq2: I'm afk for approximately the next hour, can review an upload or etc when I get back | 22:28 |
| tsimonq2 | Gracias | 22:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yt-dlp (focal-backports/universe) [2022.03.08.1-1~bpo20.04.1 => 2022.07.18-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset) | 22:35 | |
| jbicha | ubuntu-archive: https://code.launchpad.net/~jbicha/+junk/sync-blacklist | 22:56 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Simon Quigley: I just gave your SRU the seal of approval from my end via comment. | 23:03 |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: did you do a test build with this change? | 23:07 |
| tsimonq2 | sil2100: Just finished... rolling an ISO to check. | 23:07 |
| tsimonq2 | (Not uploaded quite yet.) | 23:08 |
| sil2100 | Remember that livecd-rootfs is on VCS! Would be good to have an MP for that for review purposes, for the ubuntu/jammy branch | 23:09 |
| tsimonq2 | Already working off of Git :) | 23:09 |
| tsimonq2 | Good thought though | 23:10 |
| tsimonq2 | vorlon: ...did you also want an MP for this to review first, or does that last diff look okay? | 23:10 |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: I think either way an MP would be good, since we'd need this in git before we upload to the queue. And it's a very convenient place to do reviews and iterate, better than working off pastebins IMO ;) | 23:14 |
| tsimonq2 | fair enough | 23:14 |
| sil2100 | Okay, so from my quick look this feels okay, but I'd like Steve to ACK it before we proceed. I know that this is basically a workaround, but I personally prefer just putting hooks in the hooks directory for the given project. But then again, we never had any hooks for ubuntustudio like this, so it might be a bit more invasive | 23:17 |
| tsimonq2 | If you take a look a few lines above in the code, Ubuntu Kylin does almost an identical thing | 23:17 |
| sil2100 | It's just that I'm always terrified when our auto/config grows yet another conditional | 23:17 |
| sil2100 | Yes, and I'm saying that I don't like it ;p | 23:17 |
| tsimonq2 | I don't either but it's better than the first iteration :P | 23:18 |
| sil2100 | But that's a matter of preference, which is why I'd just like Steve to +1 it | 23:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: autoflake [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4-1] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jschema-to-python [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.2.3-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: org-present [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1+git20220109.c0f1f36-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chibicc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0+git20220719+ds-1] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: org-make-toc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5-1] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | I'd be more hands-on with this process, but this happened yesterday and I'm still dealing with the fallout, and, unfortunately, it's taking priority: https://t.co/XEgtFeTiIN | 23:21 |
| sil2100 | Eickmeyer[m]: holy crap | 23:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: emacs-svg-lib [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.2.5+ds-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hazwaz [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-aio-pika [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [8.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-json-fast [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.17-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-readline [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.5-6] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-resolv-conf [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: specreduce-data [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0+git2021.11.18-2] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: writeroom-mode [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.11-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-runcat [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [18-2] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xxhash [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-mutex [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tqftpserv [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0+git20200207-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isochron [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.9~rc4-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-openssl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-json-optin [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orage [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.16.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyproject-metadata [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgpainless [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.3.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: okay, so I'd propose something like this - once you prepare the MP, let's build the new package in a clean bileto PPA, bin-sync it into the queue once it's built at the same time run a livefs build against the PPA | 23:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6ct [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:24 | |
| tsimonq2 | Sounds good! | 23:24 |
| sil2100 | Since I'd like to run a quick manifest diff to make sure the only thing that changed in the live system is the package - all before Steve is back | 23:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openmesh [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [9.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vte2.91 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.69.90-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6ct [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:24 | |
| sil2100 | It's a bit wasteful, but I prefer to be safe than sorry | 23:25 |
| sil2100 | eh, still need to play around with the linux-starfive kernel packages | 23:26 |
| sil2100 | Since I thought maybe we can somehow alter the snapshot, but that actually feels a bit more complicated than just moving the kernel back to -proposed temporarily | 23:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openmesh [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [9.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xxhash [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orage [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.16.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| tsimonq2 | I totally agree, running this ISO through a test just to make sure first | 23:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isochron [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.9~rc4-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xxhash [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-json-fast [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.17-1] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-json-optin [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tqftpserv [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0+git20200207-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vte2.91 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.69.90-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orage [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.16.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-json-optin [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vte2.91 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.69.90-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6ct [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-mutex [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6ct [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-readline [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.5-6] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-resolv-conf [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-json-fast [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.17-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-openssl [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: raku-readline [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.1.5-6] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-mutex [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-openssl [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openmesh [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [9.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tqftpserv [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0+git20200207-1] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-resolv-conf [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: shit, we might have another problem re: snapshotting | 23:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vte2.91 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.69.90-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:34 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: apparently, looking at jammy-changes, we also had new nvidia drivers published (?!) after the release candidates got built | 23:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chibicc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0+git20220719+ds-1] (no packageset) | 23:35 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: and those are pulled into the pool for our desktop images, so the snapshot will != with what we have in ubuntu | 23:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isochron [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.9~rc4-1] (no packageset) | 23:36 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: is there a way to easily modify the indexes to just pull in one package? aka. modifying the snapshot. Or maybe leave the snapshot as-is but simply leave a mention 'please also pull in livecd-rootfs version XXX' | 23:37 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: and just so it's clear: I had not given a green light for the nvidia stuff landing in -updates/-security, it was done without my knowledge | 23:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vte2.91 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/main) [0.69.90-2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xxhash [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:43 | |
| sil2100 | tsimonq2: how's the MP going? | 23:44 |
| tsimonq2 | < 5 mins | 23:44 |
| sil2100 | I'd like to get things moving ASAP, I actually had everything planned to release earlier tomorrow, and this is really breaking my night | 23:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tqftpserv [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.0+git20200207-1] (no packageset) | 23:46 | |
| sil2100 | I'll start pre-publishing the desktop images regardless | 23:47 |
| vorlon | jbicha: wrt sync-blacklist, is there also a lp bug somewhere requesting removal? | 23:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-async-mutex [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:48 | |
| tsimonq2 | https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4886/+packages | 23:48 |
| sil2100 | Thank you | 23:48 |
| tsimonq2 | Of course. MP is pushing now | 23:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isochron [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.9~rc4-1] (no packageset) | 23:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isochron [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.9~rc4-1] (no packageset) | 23:49 | |
| jbicha | vorlon: one of the 2 extensions just hit the binary NEW queue; the other is still in unapproved Debian NEW. I didn't file bugs | 23:49 |
| vorlon | sil2100: aren't the snapshots using the signed indices files from the archive? I think we want to just roll back the -updates changes | 23:49 |
| vorlon | jbicha: please file a bug for the one already in the archive | 23:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xxhash [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-resolv-conf [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6ct [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:50 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: we'd need to revert quite a lot of packages from both -updates and -security | 23:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isochron [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9~rc4-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xxhash [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.0-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6ct [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-2] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-resolv-conf [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.7.0-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isochron [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9~rc4-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-mutex [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xxhash [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.0-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tqftpserv [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0+git20200207-1] | 23:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chibicc [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0+git20220719+ds-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openmesh [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [9.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-readline [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.5-6] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-resolv-conf [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.7.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tqftpserv [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0+git20200207-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vte2.91 [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.69.90-2] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isochron [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9~rc4-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-mutex [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vte2.91 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.69.90-2] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-json-fast [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.17-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-openssl [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6.3-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orage [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [4.16.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6ct [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-2] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-json-optin [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.1-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-mutex [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-openssl [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6.3-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vte2.91 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.69.90-2] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xxhash [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-readline [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.5-6] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tqftpserv [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0+git20200207-1] | 23:51 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: are you concerned about the amount of work or the risk of breaking something? | 23:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6ct [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-2] | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orage [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.16.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-resolv-conf [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.7.0-1] | 23:51 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: both! | 23:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isochron [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9~rc4-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openmesh [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [9.0-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xxhash [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.0-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-json-fast [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.17-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vte2.91 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.69.90-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: orage [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [4.16.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openmesh [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [9.0-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6ct [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vte2.91 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.69.90-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orage [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [4.16.0-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-tokio-openssl [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [0.6.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-json-optin [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.1-1] | 23:52 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: do you want to delegate it to me so it's my fault if we break something, and get some sleep? :) | 23:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-runcat [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [18-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isochron [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.9~rc4-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgpainless [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.3.2-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6ct [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-readline [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.5-6] | 23:52 | |
| tsimonq2 | https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/427786 | 23:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hazwaz [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.1-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyproject-metadata [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6.1-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted specreduce-data [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0+git2021.11.18-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orage [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [4.16.0-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-json-fast [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.17-1] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted emacs-svg-lib [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.5+ds-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-xxhash [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.0.0-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-async-mutex [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-tokio-openssl [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6.3-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted writeroom-mode [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.11-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-aio-pika [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [8.0.3-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-resolv-conf [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.7.0-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted raku-json-optin [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.1-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tqftpserv [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0+git20200207-1] | 23:53 | |
| vorlon | sil2100: what's the last package that was included in the candidate images? ubuntustudio-meta? | 23:53 |
| jbicha | ubuntu-archive: bug 1983525 | 23:53 |
| ubottu | Bug 1983525 in gnome-shell-extension-runcat (Ubuntu) "Please remove gnome-shell-extension-runcat" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1983525 | 23:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted autoflake [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.4-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jschema-to-python [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.2.3-2] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted org-present [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1+git20220109.c0f1f36-2] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chibicc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0+git20220719+ds-1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted org-make-toc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.5-1] | 23:53 | |
| sil2100 | vorlon: yes, I think that's the last one | 23:54 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: so you want to revert all those to -proposed just to get the snapshot? | 23:54 |
| vorlon | sil2100: ok. it's a large set and annoying but I'm willing to do the work to revert them all to -proposed, yes | 23:54 |
| vorlon | also have you flagged apw yet about the fact that this broke point release freeze? | 23:54 |
| sil2100 | I must say that I got aware of the nvidia stuff landing only just now, I only knew about the accidental linux-starfive release from klebers earlier. So I didn't flag him yet | 23:56 |
| sil2100 | And I have no idea why apw actually published those | 23:56 |
| sil2100 | I know linux-starfive was accidental as the bug was not marked as blocked for proposed | 23:56 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: can't we just leave the current snapshot and add a note next to it to update livecd-rootfs to this-and-that version? ;p Since we're the only consumers of the snapshots, right? | 23:57 |
| sarnold | there's been an nvidia CRD planned for august 2 for a few weeks :( probably the folks who work on that are heads-down on it, and not aware of the release cycle needs | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!