[15:00] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:00:23 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:00] <jawn-smith> #topic Lightning Round
[15:00] <juliank> o/
[15:00] <schopin> o/
[15:00] <ogayot> o/
[15:00] <jawn-smith> The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-04-august-2022/29845
[15:00] <bdrung> \o
[15:00] <sil2100> o/
[15:01] <jawn-smith> Let's take a moment to read and ask questions
[15:01] <slyon> o/
[15:01] <sil2100> I did not write my status again, it starting to become a habit. I blame the point-releases
[15:10] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:10] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:11] <jawn-smith> bug 1982791
[15:11] <ubottu> Bug 1982791 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "An EoL release cannot dist-upgrade if not all updates are installed and the release has been archived to old-releases" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1982791
[15:11] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: You tagged this one
[15:12] <bdmurray> This won't matter for KK but will for LL
[15:13] <bdmurray> so let's retag in rls-ll-incoming
[15:13] <jawn-smith> Okay sounds good to me.
[15:13] <jawn-smith> bug 1982486
[15:13] <ubottu> Bug 1982486 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Kinetic) "update-motd-fsck-at-reboot: exclude nbd devices" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1982486
[15:14] <jawn-smith> We discussed this last week, let me read the logs
[15:14] <bdmurray> we carded it so it just needs cleaning which I'll do
[15:14] <jawn-smith> Great, thanks.
[15:14] <jawn-smith> bug 1315559
[15:14] <ubottu> Bug 1315559 in apport (Ubuntu) "UpgradeStatus can be incorrect" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1315559
[15:14] <jawn-smith> that's a low number
[15:15] <jawn-smith> Reported by bdmurray in 2014
[15:15] <bdmurray> vintage
[15:15] <jawn-smith> Has something changed to make this more urgent?
[15:15] <bdmurray> It confused Steve in https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/2ccb554c-1279-11ed-b06e-fa163ef35206
[15:15] <bdmurray> UpgradeStatus 	
[15:15] <bdmurray> Upgraded to groovy on 2022-08-02 (0 days ago)
[15:16] <vorlon> which I was only paying attention to because it was an ubuntu-release-upgrade crash
[15:17] <jawn-smith> Sounds worth working then, let's card it
[15:17] <mclemenceau> ok
[15:17] <jawn-smith> Thanks
[15:17] <bdmurray> Its horribly confusing and only somebody who is part of the furniture would know why its wrong
[15:18] <jawn-smith> bug 1979952
[15:18] <ubottu> Bug 1979952 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Bind mount to NFS mount fails on Ubuntu 22.04" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979952
[15:18] <enr0n> I was able to confirm this is present in jammy and kinetic
[15:18] <jawn-smith> Looks like there's an upstream fix already
[15:18] <enr0n> There is a straight forward upstream fix available which I have tested
[15:18] <slyon> sounds like a nice inclusion for the next jammy SRU
[15:18] <enr0n> So I think we should card this and include it in the upcoming jammy SRU for systemd
[15:18] <jawn-smith> Alright let's card it and remove the tag then, sounds like enr0n is on top of it
[15:19] <bdmurray> Is there a timeline for that?
[15:19] <bdmurray> After .1?
[15:19] <slyon> yes, after .1. The last one was just 1 month ago
[15:20] <enr0n> Yeah that makes sense.
[15:20] <jawn-smith> Is the systemd SRU cycle documented somewhere?
[15:20] <slyon> so unless we need some critical fix, we wait a bit more
[15:20] <jawn-smith> Just for my own curiosity
[15:20] <slyon> jawn-smith: it is not, AFAIK
[15:20] <jawn-smith> Okay, that might be something worth doing... eventually
[15:20] <slyon> ack
[15:21] <jawn-smith> Alright that's getting carded. Moving on
[15:21] <jawn-smith> bug 1981109
[15:21] <ubottu> Bug 1981109 in modemmanager (Ubuntu) "server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in every container" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1981109
[15:21] <sil2100> huh
[15:21] <sil2100> When adding the new RISC-V platforms, some of the generic non-SUBARCH code
[15:21] <jawn-smith> Last we discussed this there was nothing for foundations to work on.
[15:21] <sil2100>     went missing and some invalid assumptions have been made, causing cloud
[15:21] <sil2100> eeek, accidental paste
[15:21] <sil2100> ...please ignore
[15:22] <jawn-smith> It's marked as fixed in livecd-rootfs. vorlon do you agree there is currently nothing for foundations to work on related to this bug?
[15:22] <vorlon> it needs to be fixed in jammy
[15:22] <vorlon> so should probably be carded for that
[15:23] <jawn-smith> Ah okay, let's card that then
[15:24] <mclemenceau> ok
[15:24] <jawn-smith> Thanks!
[15:24] <jawn-smith> bug 1981721
[15:24] <ubottu> Bug 1981721 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "dual port SRIOV NIC with 64 VFs per PF  is not configured with switchdev eswitch mode" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1981721
[15:24] <jawn-smith> slyon: are we still waiting on openstack input?
[15:24] <slyon> no update on that since last week, so let's skip
[15:24] <jawn-smith> Cool, that's it for kk
[15:24] <slyon> i think it's not very high priority for the openstack team
[15:24] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:24] <bdmurray> dupes
[15:25] <jawn-smith> ah, looks like both of these jj bugs have already been discussed/carded
[15:25] <jawn-smith> rls-ff is empty for foundations, but has a few unknowns again
[15:25] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:25] <jawn-smith> None of those look like foundations packages to me. Agreed?
[15:26] <bdmurray> +1
[15:26]  * bdrung agrees
[15:26] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:26] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:26] <jawn-smith> vorlon:
[15:27] <slyon> re lintian: we could promote libregexp-wildcards-perl, the MIR is ready (LP: #1980968)
[15:27] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1980968 in lintian (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libregexp-wildcards-perl" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1980968
[15:28] <slyon> which would resolve one of the dependencies
[15:28] <slyon> others are still pending
[15:28] <vorlon> ubuntu-meta: still in desktop team's hands
[15:29] <vorlon> lintian: in MIR land per the above
[15:29] <vorlon> but the MIR tasks are marked incomplete?
[15:30] <slyon> yes. those are still pending. only libregexp-wildcards-perl is done
[15:30] <vorlon> looks like this is largely with ginggs who I believe is out this week
[15:30] <slyon> which is a different LP bug
[15:30] <slyon> that's true.
[15:31] <vorlon> mutt has been blocked on gsasl for 25 days; I don't see that this was assigned out last week or discussed?
[15:31] <slyon> vorlon: that's a MIR as well, blocked on security review
[15:32] <vorlon> aha thanks, hadn't clicked through on the bug yet
[15:32] <vorlon> gcc-12, looks like we're waiting for doko, who is also out this week
[15:34] <vorlon> ogayot: are you still on zlib?
[15:34] <vorlon> sounds like gcc-12 is hamstrung by launchpad build farm issues that we're waiting for a resolution on
[15:34] <ogayot> fheimes has been actively working on that one, I tested the patch from bug 1983255 but unfortunately still red for me
[15:34] <ubottu> Bug 1983255 in samtools-legacy (Ubuntu) "samtools-legacy misses 'Remove compressBound assertions' (PR #1258) fix" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1983255
[15:35] <vorlon> ogayot: ok, and this is a real regression introduced by new zlib?
[15:35] <schopin> seems likely, as the new upload was for s390x specific code.
[15:36] <ogayot> using an old zlib does not trigger the bug, but I don't think this is strictly caused by zlib
[15:36] <vorlon> ogayot: but in any case we need tests fixed before we progress, ok
[15:36] <vorlon> sqlite3 vs senlin: this was mentioned last week as 'probably needs a retry' but it's still stuck
[15:37] <vorlon> and was retried several times on the 31st so this needs someone to take it and dig in
[15:37] <vorlon> bdmurray: can you take this?
[15:38] <bdmurray> maybe
[15:39] <vorlon> waveform: can you take senlin?
[15:39] <waveform> I'm out next week, so if it can wait a week, yes
[15:40] <vorlon> you mean you can't fix it tomorrow? :)
[15:40] <vorlon> anyway
[15:40] <vorlon> waveform: senlin/sqlite3
[15:40] <bdmurray> senlin passes in debian so I can try it with more resources
[15:40] <waveform> ack :)
[15:40] <schopin> I'll take rustc vs llvm
[15:40] <vorlon> schopin: thanks
[15:41] <vorlon> libgd-perl was mis-triaged last week, it was dep-wait but required someone to make changes to get the new build-deps built on i386.  That was done, then it failed to install those build-deps; I'm going to retry it and I'll follow through
[15:42] <vorlon> apt missing builds, also an i386 issue somehow, I'll follow up (I think this was already cleared)
[15:42] <bdrung> the regression there on gbrowse was reported as Debian bug #1014797 and forwarded upstream (no response there yet)
[15:42] <ubottu> Debian bug 1014797 in src:gbrowse "FTBFS: test failures with new libgd3" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1014797
[15:43] <bdrung> (referring to libgd-perl)
[15:43] <vorlon> devscripts ALSO dep-wait on i386
[15:43] <vorlon> for the same package as apt, so I'll take that too :/
[15:43] <slyon> I'll take liburi-perl, because TIL
[15:43] <vorlon> slyon: thanks
[15:44] <vorlon> let's give curl / hddemux to dbungert
[15:46] <vorlon> bdmurray: can you take libuv1?
[15:46] <vorlon> eh
[15:46] <vorlon> bdrung: can you take libuv1? :)
[15:46] <bdrung> I prefer to look an the sudo regressions
[15:48] <vorlon> ok
[15:48] <vorlon> enr0n: can you take libuv1?
[15:49] <enr0n> Yes indeed
[15:49] <vorlon> jawn-smith: can you take casper?
[15:49] <jawn-smith> ack
[15:49] <vorlon> and that's it
[15:49] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[15:52] <jawn-smith> Any holidays or vacations coming up?
[15:53] <bdrung> soon-ish (but not next week)
[15:54] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[15:54] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:54:48 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-08-04-15.00.moin.txt