| Bashing-om | Fallen: Reading yesterday's log - IRT available docs. Are you aware of https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PopularPages ? | 02:19 |
|---|---|---|
| lotuspsychje | thats handy Bashing-om ! | 02:23 |
| Bashing-om | lotuspsychje: Way back was usun's that started that - Canonical took it over ! | 02:27 |
| Bashing-om | lotuspsychje: I have not worked it in some years - do not know how up-2-date the pages are :( | 02:33 |
| lotuspsychje | kk tnx for the link | 02:34 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Oh good grief. OK, I'm thankful we're moving the Wiki to Discourse. MoinMoin syntax looks absolutely crazy. | 03:23 |
| lotuspsychje | :p | 03:23 |
| Fallen | Neat, thank you Bashing-om! | 08:45 |
| lotuspsychje | good day to all | 09:41 |
| lotuspsychje | Fallen: i was wondering, lets say a volunteer has an idea to improve the community, do we have place to gather the ideas? | 11:40 |
| Fallen | Nothing structured at the moment. Depending on scope I think posting on discourse.ubuntu.com/c/community would be best. | 11:41 |
| lotuspsychje | individualy or in a seperate thread? | 11:42 |
| ogra | probably cretae a separate "input" subcategory ? | 11:42 |
| ogra | *create | 11:43 |
| lotuspsychje | that would be nice indeed | 11:43 |
| Fallen | No specific preference, whatever feels natural. If they are completely different things then multiple threads might make sense, but 10 threads on very small suggestions might be overkill as well. | 11:43 |
| lotuspsychje | would be nice if we indeed had a subcategory as ogra stated, so both volunteers & devs can overview/handle them? | 11:44 |
| lotuspsychje | so the treasures dont get lost in irc space :p | 11:45 |
| ogra | yeah | 11:45 |
| Fallen | "input" seems general enough that I think it could stay in the main discourse category for now. Eventually we might want to do something like connect.mozilla.org or ideas.orbit.love. | 11:45 |
| ogra | also, the CC can easily pick topics for teir meeting as needed from it | 11:45 |
| ogra | *their | 11:45 |
| lotuspsychje | yeah i like that | 11:45 |
| lotuspsychje | the more straightforward/centralized will be best for everyone right | 11:46 |
| Fallen | And folks could optionally use discourse tags, e.g. `idea` | 11:46 |
| ogra | 👍 | 11:46 |
| Fallen | tomreyn: I checked with the team on the issue you mentioned, someone had started on that but is on vacation right now. We'll have to check back in when they are back. | 11:47 |
| tomreyn | Thanks Fallen. Where I work, we hand over critical tasks when we leave for holidays. | 11:48 |
| Fallen | Generally true here as well. I don't know the full backstory to this issue, I'm under the assumption they have a reasonable approach :) | 11:51 |
| tomreyn | Yes, lets assume the best. :) | 11:53 |
| lotuspsychje | Fallen: i see there's also this category; https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/site-feedback/3 | 12:05 |
| ogra | well, thats more for feedback around discourse itself, no ? | 12:12 |
| ogra | "Discussion about this site, its organization, how it works, and how we can improve it" | 12:13 |
| Fallen | madhens: Britt Mauro Gaspari fwiw I no longer consider the JIRA Kanban board to be remotely readable. It is good that we have many issues on the board and are able to drill things down, but the plan/advanced roadmap view is much more digestable imo now. If you see a blank view you might need to change the view to "Full Planning" once, I made some changes that required deleting the prior initial view. If you want an example of a | 13:51 |
| Fallen | timeline drilldown I like please check out CT-55 in the advanced roadmap view. | 13:51 |
| ilvipero | <Fallen> "madhens: Britt Mauro Gaspari..." <- Yes, I agree. Thank you Fallen: 👍 | 13:58 |
| madhens | 👍 | 14:24 |
| arraybolt3[m] | So, quick question - now that I have Wiki Editor access, is it OK for me to just edit stuff anywhere I can see room for improvement or something that needs updated or fixed? Or are there some things where it's "ok well technically you *can* edit this but you *shouldn't*"? | 20:10 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Like, I'm about to edit the page here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses to change the support request canned response to also include a link to the IRC webchat links page. | 20:11 |
| bwyazel | Discourse post is up detailing my time at GUADEC 2022 | 20:17 |
| bwyazel | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-team-guadec-2022-in-guadalajara-mexico/29892/1 | 20:17 |
| Fallen | arraybolt3: You are welcome to go ahead. You may want to ask for some of the more official sounding pages, e.g. you probably don't want to edit a community governance page without asking the respective council. | 20:34 |
| arraybolt3[m] | Fallen: Sounds like a plan, thank you! | 20:35 |
| Fallen | arraybolt3: you might be interested in the documentation improvement framework we intend to use: https://diataxis.fr/ | 20:37 |
| arraybolt3[m] | I think I saw something about that! I'll definitely look into it. | 20:38 |
| Fallen | teward (et al): hey :) How are we doing on community council meeting scheduling - ok to remove the meeting from the calendar for now until you find something new? | 22:10 |
| teward | i dont see why we need the meeting until we define a new schedule | 22:12 |
| teward | unrelated i needed yanked out of my coding focus so thanks for that | 22:12 |
| Fallen | Happy to be at your service :D | 22:13 |
| Fallen | Alright, I'll remove the event then. If others disagree we can recreate it easily, and maybe this gives incentive to do some scheduling. | 22:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!