[01:28] <uman> Hello. I have a patch that fixes a minor bug in the software-properties-gtk package. How can I contribute it?
[01:29] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: Is it intended for the development release or for an existing, stable release?
[01:30] <uman> I suppose the development release.
[01:30] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: Either way, the first thing to do (if you've not done so already) is to get a debdiff of the patch.
[01:30] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: Make sure to build a deb with the patch yourself and test it on the latest development release to ensure it works (if you've not already done that).
[01:31] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: Then you'd probably need to ask for a sponsor, which I believe there's a mailing list for, though I'm willing to bet you can find someone to sponsor your patch into the archives right here.
[01:32] <uman> OK, thanks for the info.
[01:32] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: If there's any changes that need made first, they'll tell you, and once everything looks good they'll upload it and it will become part of Ubuntu.
[01:32] <arraybolt3[m]> Happy to help out! In case you need it, I'll put a link where you can download the latest development release.
[01:32] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[01:33] <arraybolt3[m]> Thank you for your help in assisting us with the Ubuntu project!
[01:33] <uman> I am already running latest Kinetic
[01:34] <uman> ok, I will make a debdiff tomorrow and submit it
[01:36] <arraybolt3[m]> uman: Also, for more info about getting a patch sponsored: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess
[04:31] <Unit193> mapreri: Oh wow, core dev!  Congrats!
[08:06] <luis220413> Feature Freeze is approaching and I would like to get bug 1979893 fixed before Feature Freeze (because Varnish 7.x is a major release with many new features).
[08:13] <luis220413> The linked Debian bugs have not been responded to since June 26. I believe the libvmod-re2 source package should be removed from the Ubuntu archive and varnish-modules should not be built on armhf, or the test failures addressed or ignored.
[08:13] <luis220413> ... on that architecture
[08:16] <luis220413> See the bug for the rationale
[08:18] <luis220413> s/7.x/7.1.0/ ... new features compared with 6.6.1-1
[11:39] <luis220413> I am back. Moving this to #ubuntu-release.
[13:36] <luis220413> I will be back in 1 hour but remain online.
[13:59] <luis220413> I am back.
[19:53] <luis220413> When should I discuss my SRU for openconnect (bug 1969734)? This is a fatal bug for users of a significant portion of GlobalProtect VPNs (simply it does not connect) but it does not have enough priority to go into 22.04.1 (to be released on August 11).
[19:53] <luis220413> I can discuss anywhere from 04:30 to 21:00 UTC.
[19:54] <luis220413> On any date before September 17
[19:54] <luis220413> *18
[19:58] <luis220413> For an SRU vanguard to get it into jammy-proposed.
[19:59] <luis220413> I will return in 15 minutes but remain online.
[20:07] <luis220413> I am back.
[20:22] <jbicha> luis220413: could you wait at least a few days before reminding us about your SRU again? Not trying to be rude, but we've heard your request
[20:58] <luis220413> jbicha: Yes. I will remind you on August 17 to take the next step (move to jammy-proposed or to jammy-updates).
[20:59] <luis220413> If they are not both done, of course
[21:41] <Eickmeyer[m]> !guidelines | luis220413 Please see this, particularly the part about "Time to ask", "Don't repeat your question every few minutes" (don't take minutes literally that can be hours), and "Don't be annoying".
[21:51] <luis220413> Eickmeyer[m]: OK
[22:06] <Unit193> mapreri: OK, popped them into -backports, waiting on approval.
[23:26] <mwhudson> Depends: libc6 (>> 2.36), libc6 (<< 2.36)
[23:26] <mwhudson> oops
[23:28] <sarnold> heh
[23:29] <Unit193> Haha. :D