[14:04] <cpaelzer> Hi MIR people, I have another important meeting that most likely runs over - can anyone else lead today?
[14:30] <slyon> cpaelzer: I can!"
[14:30] <didrocks> hey, I’m in conflicting meeting/debugging session as usual, but I can try leading if there is no-one else available.
[14:30] <didrocks> ah slyon to the rescue :)
[14:31] <slyon> let me set up my tabs...
[14:31] <didrocks> (same, I’m half here, but regularly switching back to the meeting)
[14:31] <slyon> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:31] <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:31:15 UTC.  The chair is slyon.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[14:31] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[14:31] <slyon> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage
[14:32] <jbicha> hi, I'm here from Desktop also if there is anything that needs discussion there
[14:32] <joalif> jo
[14:32] <joalif> hi
[14:33] <slyon> #topic current component mismatches
[14:33] <slyon> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:33] <cpaelzer> FYI - back with you
[14:33] <slyon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:33] <slyon> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:33] <slyon> -release looks fine. nothing new
[14:33] <cpaelzer> ack
[14:33] <sarnold> good morning
[14:33] <slyon> -proposed: I cannot spot anything special either.
[14:33] <cpaelzer> unaproved and stubs all over the place - but nothing new indeed slyon
[14:34] <sarnold> \o/
[14:34] <slyon> libregexp-wildcards-perl is ready. It could be promoted by any AA, to shrink that lintian tree a bit (cc @cpaelzer if you feel like)
[14:34] <slyon> #topic New MIRs
[14:34] <slyon> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
[14:34] <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:35] <slyon> bug #1983996
[14:35] <slyon> is came from foundations. should be fairly simple, as the package is mostly empty right now. joalif would you like to do the review on this one?
[14:36] <joalif> ok
[14:36] <slyon> thanks!
[14:36] <slyon> bug #1977614
[14:36] <jbicha> fdk-aac isn't urgent :)
[14:36] <slyon> This is new from jbicha. seems to be a lower priority MIR for the desktop team
[14:36] <slyon> I could take a look at this
[14:37] <slyon> that's all new MIRs
[14:37] <slyon> jbicha: you're still working on that editorconfig-core one, right?
[14:37] <slyon> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[14:37] <jbicha> I have one more new one from desktop that I'm still filling out details for today. Bug 1984104 It is wanted for kinetic
[14:37] <slyon> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:37] <slyon> bug #1984104
[14:38] <slyon> that's the one ^
[14:38] <slyon> it's for desktop, so maybe cpaelzer could have a look at that one, once read? sticking to our "cross-team review" policy :)
[14:38] <cpaelzer> slyon: I've handled libregexp-wildcards-perl now
[14:39] <slyon> thanks!
[14:39] <cpaelzer> yeah if it is ready by tomorrow I can try to have a look at it
[14:39] <slyon> ty
[14:39] <cpaelzer> I keep it open and check if it then is no more incomplete
[14:40] <cpaelzer> if it is I run out of time before sprint+PTO
[14:40] <cpaelzer> then I'll leave it for next week
[14:40] <jbicha> thanks!
[14:40] <slyon> ack, sounds good
[14:40] <slyon> we don't have any other incomplete bugs
[14:40] <slyon> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
[14:40] <slyon> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
[14:40] <slyon> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:40] <slyon> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
[14:40] <slyon> (internal)
[14:40] <slyon> sarnold:
[14:41] <sarnold> we've had some problems starting in on libbluray, 2/3 of us had trouble building it yesterday
[14:41] <cpaelzer> thanks for completing ipmitool btw
[14:41] <sarnold> it's not a huge problem, it's a low priority package, but mark was interested in it :) so he took a crack at it
[14:41] <cpaelzer> sarnold: since you were part of the rust-rules crew do you tihnk you could have a look at mdevctl?
[14:42] <cpaelzer> we have just landed the minor improvements we know and are updating to latest upstream
[14:42] <cpaelzer> but the security ack is what is missing
[14:42] <sarnold> and libqrtr-glib was finished :D
[14:42] <cpaelzer> and since it is a new process there might be more to find than usual
[14:42] <sarnold> cpaelzer: good point, yeah
[14:42]  * cpaelzer is happy about security reviews getting finished \o/
[14:42] <sarnold> me too :D
[14:42] <sarnold> it's a lovely feeling
[14:43] <didrocks> it’s a never ending story though :p
[14:43] <sarnold> don't ruin this man, it's been a welcome change :)
[14:43] <didrocks> that doesn’t remove the fact that it’s an excellent job from the security team :)
[14:43] <slyon> indeed! kudos sarnold and team!
[14:44] <slyon> #topic Any other business?
[14:44] <cpaelzer> not from me
[14:44] <sarnold> none from he
[14:44] <didrocks> nothing either
[14:44] <cpaelzer> thanks for leading today slyon!
[14:44] <joalif> nothing either
[14:44] <slyon> sweet, thanks all!
[14:44] <slyon> #endmeeting
[14:44] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 14:44:44 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-08-09-14.31.moin.txt
[14:44] <sarnold> thanks slyon, all :)
[14:44] <joalif> thanks slyon, all :)
[14:45] <jbicha> can someone check if libqrtr-glib is ok for promotion now? it's already in component-mismatches
[14:45] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libqrtr-glib/+bug/1963707
[14:46] <cpaelzer> MIR Ack, security ACK
[14:46] <slyon> It seems to have both required ACKs, so the status should be changed to "Fix committed"
[14:46] <cpaelzer> jbicha: let me ask, what does the "getting the HW" doing
[14:46] <cpaelzer> any updates?
[14:47] <jbicha> I don't know any details on that. I can ask but some of the desktop leads are out this week
[14:47] <cpaelzer> please do so
[14:48] <cpaelzer> because we do not want you or anyone else to write a test plan for the sake of writing a plan
[14:48] <cpaelzer> but for exectuing on it for uploads
[14:48] <cpaelzer> and regularly if possible
[14:48] <cpaelzer> so in this case it seemed to depend on HW to be able to do so
[14:48] <cpaelzer> which is why I'd at least want to hear a hopeful word, if not even "yes it is here" to waive this fully through
[14:48] <cpaelzer> does that make sense?
[14:49] <slyon> I agree
[14:49] <jbicha> yes, I'll ask & we can leave it as unfinished business for next week's meeting
[14:50] <cpaelzer> thanks
[14:50] <cpaelzer> I updated the case
[14:52] <jbicha> 👍