[07:24] <ogayot> hello! I am looking for a sponsor (MOTU or coredev) for bug 1983255. fheimes is the original author of the patch and I tested it with success. It solves the autopkgtest regression of libbio-samtools-perl vs zlib. Thanks!
[12:02] <rbasak> slyon: vorlon: you have conflicting isc-dhcp uploads in Jammy. I'm waiting on the .1 release but you might want to use that time to resolve that.
[12:06] <slyon> rbasak: vorlon: Yes. This is also being discussed in Jira (FR-2552). Steve wasn't fully +1 on my isc-dhcp upload yet. So if in doubt, mine should be dropped (or maybe Steve wants to combine them).
[12:08] <rbasak> The information need to be in the bug please, otherwise another SRU team member might accept it.
[12:22] <slyon> you're right. I'll copy it over
[12:50] <mdeslaur> It looks like seeded-in-ubuntu only does the dev release based on a json file on ubuntuwire...is there anything to query seeds for stable releases?
[13:40] <rbasak> mdeslaur: I only know of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/
[13:45] <mdeslaur> rbasak: thanks
[13:47] <ahasenack> hi, just to say that during my +1 maintenance this week, I'm going over pytest induced dep8 failes, and opencascade migration
[13:48] <ahasenack> s/failes/failures/
[14:57] <ahasenack> doko_: hi, are you about to upload python3-defaults 3.10.5?
[14:58] <ahasenack> python3-distutils is currently uninstallable
[14:58] <ahasenack> python3-distutils : Depends: python3:any (>= 3.10.5-0~)
[14:58] <ahasenack>                      Depends: python3-lib2to3 (= 3.10.6-1) but 3.10.5-2ubuntu2 is to be installed
[17:14] <ahasenack> hi, is someone currently building/uploading python3-defaults 3.10.5?
[17:15] <ahasenack> some python packages are uninstallable in kinetic right now
[20:41] <sergiodj> mwhudson: heya, maybe this has been reported already but there's a problem with glibc versioning in Jammy/Kinetic.  currently, glibc from Jammy has a greater version than the one from Kinetic (2.35-0ubuntu3.1 vs 2.35-0ubuntu3)
[20:42] <sergiodj> just checking if you're aware of it.  I can prepare a no-change upload to Kinetic in order to fix the problem if you'd like
[20:55] <mwhudson> sergiodj: i am aware of it, we'll upload 2.36 fairly soon
[20:55] <sergiodj> mwhudson: ack, thanks
[20:56] <mwhudson> sergiodj: glibc uploads trigger all the autopkgtests in the world so we don't want to do them too often...
[20:56] <sergiodj> yeah, I figured that was the reason :)
[20:58] <sergiodj> I hit a corner case here where this problem blocked me, but I can workaround it just fine
[23:17] <mwhudson> i should stop trying to work out why we get very obscure math errors on ppc64el when building glibc with gcc 12 and just upload glibc 2.36 building with gcc 11
[23:17] <mwhudson> (sunk too much time into https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106574 which is a very obscure math error on amd64...)
[23:23] <sarnold> mwhudson: could creduce or delta help you get a smallish reproducer?
[23:25] <mwhudson> sarnold: perhaps although i think i have some idea what's going on now and i think i need a gcc developer :)
[23:25] <sarnold> mwhudson: oh no, sorry to hear it :)
[23:25] <sarnold> (there's a #gcc on irc.oftc.net if it'd help)