| Bedlore | Hi all, I did an upgrade to 22.04.01 and it worked well, however the desktop is still running xfce, any advice on how to jump to the correct version? | 01:48 |
|---|---|---|
| oerheks | ubuntu studio uses KDE now, reinstall please | 01:49 |
| Bedlore | so no way to migrate in a live sitation? | 01:49 |
| Bedlore | bummer since everything else appears to still work well | 01:49 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Bedlore: If you read the release notes, we only support reinstall due to the change in desktop environment from 22.04. | 01:54 |
| Bedlore | yes I did read that and understood, I just assumed I wasn't the only person on the planet wanting to try and migrate a live system and accept the risks | 01:55 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Bedlore: You might try logging out, going to a virtual terminal (ctrl-alt-F3), login, sudo apt autoremove, go back to the login screen (ctrl-alt-F1) select KDE Plasma as the login session, and login. | 02:20 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | It might be that you have both sessions installed still, but I don't know. Upgrading in-place from 20.04 to 22.04 is unsupported and untested. | 02:21 |
| Bedlore | Cheers Eickmeyer[m], I'll backup and give it a go, might end up reinstalling of course, but this desktop has sooo many services/custom things happening it would be nice if I succeed | 02:31 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Bedlore: I get it, 100%. Back everything up. | 02:32 |
| tarzeau | did anyone have a chance to give photoqt a try? any feedback? (ubuntustudio worthy?) | 13:40 |
| tarzeau | and vimix? | 13:40 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | tarzeau: Not exactly. Let me give them a shot today and see. | 13:44 |
| tarzeau | Eickmeyer[m]: thanks! and i was wondering how interest in shotcut and olive-editor are, as well as not yet packaged natron (itp ready, builds and works) | 13:45 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | tarzeau: We had shotcut, and it duplicates a lot of the function of kdenlive. While it's already in the repo and easy to install, we can't over-bloat our live .iso with it (two video editors). | 13:46 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | We're trying to cut-down to one item per function. | 13:46 |
| tarzeau | i can understand that, no problem (i've read about size constraints for the last 12 months) | 13:46 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | The size constraints aren't an issue anymore (iso-level=3 was implemented, allowing a squashfs > 4GB) but one of our criticisms is the sheer size anyhow. | 13:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!