[01:48] <Bedlore> Hi all, I did an upgrade to 22.04.01 and it worked well, however the desktop is still running xfce, any advice on how to jump to the correct version?
[01:49] <oerheks> ubuntu studio uses KDE now, reinstall please
[01:49] <Bedlore> so no way to migrate in a live sitation?
[01:49] <Bedlore> bummer since everything else appears to still work well
[01:54] <Eickmeyer[m]> Bedlore: If you read the release notes, we only support reinstall due to the change in desktop environment from 22.04.
[01:55] <Bedlore> yes I did read that and understood, I just assumed I wasn't the only person on the planet wanting to try and migrate a live system and accept the risks
[02:20] <Eickmeyer[m]> Bedlore: You might try logging out, going to a virtual terminal (ctrl-alt-F3), login, sudo apt autoremove, go back to the login screen (ctrl-alt-F1) select KDE Plasma as the login session, and login.
[02:21] <Eickmeyer[m]> It might be that you have both sessions installed still, but I don't know. Upgrading in-place from 20.04 to 22.04 is unsupported and untested.
[02:31] <Bedlore> Cheers Eickmeyer[m], I'll backup and give it a go, might end up reinstalling of course, but this desktop has sooo many services/custom things happening it would be nice if I succeed
[02:32] <Eickmeyer[m]> Bedlore: I get it, 100%. Back everything up.
[13:40] <tarzeau> did anyone have a chance to give photoqt a try? any feedback? (ubuntustudio worthy?)
[13:40] <tarzeau> and vimix?
[13:44] <Eickmeyer[m]> tarzeau: Not exactly. Let me give them a shot today and see.
[13:45] <tarzeau> Eickmeyer[m]: thanks! and i was wondering how interest in shotcut and olive-editor are, as well as not yet packaged natron (itp ready, builds and works)
[13:46] <Eickmeyer[m]> tarzeau: We had shotcut, and it duplicates a lot of the function of kdenlive. While it's already in the repo and easy to install, we can't over-bloat our live .iso with it (two video editors).
[13:46] <Eickmeyer[m]> We're trying to cut-down to one item per function.
[13:46] <tarzeau> i can understand that, no problem (i've read about size constraints for the last 12 months)
[13:47] <Eickmeyer[m]> The size constraints aren't an issue anymore (iso-level=3 was implemented, allowing a squashfs > 4GB) but one of our criticisms is the sheer size anyhow.