 Any updates on this bug fix? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-default-settings/+bug/1965439
 A fix has been uploaded, and is in the queue for admins to review (re @CrustyCrab55: Any updates on this bug fix? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-default-settings/+bug/1965439)
 Is there any newer live kernel for ubuntu studio? Today i got 5.15.0.46
 But other derivates of pinux got already 5.18 and higher
 Linux
[12:46] <BluesKaj> Hi all
[12:47] <duckzilla> hello
[12:47] <duckzilla> how is everyone
[12:48] <BluesKaj> ok here, duckzilla, how about you?
[12:49] <duckzilla> good, im getting a laptop for christmas and im planning on installing kubuntu on it
[12:50] <BluesKaj> nice
[12:54] <Eickmeyer[m]> @Oski146 The kernel is handled by the Ubuntu kernel team. The low latency kernel has more uses beyond Ubuntu Studio. What you have is the latest. Ubuntu Studio doesn't operate from a separate repository than the rest of Ubuntu, hence it's a flavor, not a distribution.
 Thank you for fast response 😊
 Wait this mean all other Ubuntu Based distributions including Kubuntu will gain the new kernel update? (re @IrcsomeBot: <Eickmeyer[m]> @Oski146 The kernel is handled by the Ubuntu kernel team. The low latency kernel has more uses beyond Ubuntu Studio. What you have is the latest. Ubuntu Studio doesn't operate from a separate repository than the rest of Ubuntu, hence it's a flavor, not a distribution.)
 Wait this mean all other Ubuntu Based flavors including Kubuntu will gain the new kernel update? (re @IrcsomeBot: <Eickmeyer[m]> @Oski146 The kernel is handled by the Ubuntu kernel team. The low latency kernel has more uses beyond Ubuntu Studio. What you have is the latest. Ubuntu Studio doesn't operate from a separate repository than the rest of Ubuntu, hence it's a flavor, not a distribution.)
[12:59] <Eickmeyer[m]> @CrustyCrab55: Kubuntu is also merely an official flavor of Ubuntu, not a separate distribution, so yes. An example of a separate distribution would be pop_os or Linux Mint, which use separate repositories.
 OMG yes I’ll hit terminal and see if there’s work around there 😃
[16:48] <magic_ninja> which file system would be best to store large amounts of data (10+ TB) ? I swap my drive every 5 or so years and it's time to upgrade, and I want to move away from NTFS.
[16:48] <magic_ninja> My storage drive that is. All I do is store my archives of stuff on it.
[16:49] <magic_ninja> I'm planning on using my old 6TB drive to back up select parts of the new 14TB one.
[16:49] <Dragnslcr> I'm a big fan of ZFS
[16:50] <magic_ninja> Right on. Most of the info I've found is general information. It seems like a toss-up between btrfs and ZFS.
[16:50] <Dragnslcr> Snapshots are a huge feature, and it's easy to copy snapshots to another disk that you can use for separate/off-site backups
[16:50] <magic_ninja> I want something that helps with bit rot and that I don't have to mess with. I'm not doing raid or anything like that.
[16:51] <magic_ninja> Though I might partition the 14TB one so that I can just back up certain partitions or something to the 6TB
 Ok (re @CrustyCrab55: You might wanna try this:
 sudo apt list - - upgradable
 Suppose it lists the following packages x,y,z
 Now you may wanna try, sudo apt upgrade x,y,z)
[20:02] <Specctre> noticed the plasma integration extension in firefox is not working.  Says "Failed to connect to native host".  Firefox is installed through snap.  Is this a known thing with Firefox though snap?  Tried flatpak and it was the same issue.  On my laptop on KDE Neon with firefox installed through apt (non snap) it works fine.
[20:03] <cbreak> Specctre: that's the typical snap problem
[20:03] <Specctre> cbreak: and no fix I take it?
[20:03] <cbreak> all those modern packaging methods fuck up desktop integration for security
[20:03] <cbreak> I think there's an inofficial firefox ppa that should work
[20:04] <cbreak> but while I very much dislike snap, I dislike relying on third parties for browser security (or any security) even more, so I can't give you first hand information about this :P
[20:04] <Specctre> okay, yeh I saw someone talking about doing it that way but had issues with it still installing the snap version when it updates
[20:04] <cbreak> is the plasma integration useful?
[20:05] <Specctre> just playing with it so can't really answer that just yet ;)
[20:06] <Specctre> I'm just getting back into using linux after quite a break so just exploring and going down rabbit holes
[20:07] <Specctre> really liking kubuntu and KDE neon, just interestin to see the differences between them.
[20:08] <cbreak> I like kubuntu, but the browser integration never seemed useful, back in 21.04 when I tried it
[21:16] <leaftype> what is the kde firefox integration anyways?
[21:17] <leaftype> are we talking about the search? because that works fine for me
[21:17] <cbreak> I think it integrates bookmarks and stuff into the kde launcher thingie, which I dislike, and a bunch of other things
 https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Browser_Integration
[21:19] <piperjon> Super noob here, have studio. Apparently it's time to upgrade the whole shebang; am I in for happy fun times learning a bunch of stuff, or is there a simple approach?  I made the mistake of googling it...
[21:19] <leaftype> I use kde connect all the time, and it can control youtube just fine with a firefox snap
[21:19] <leaftype> all that stuff is working
[21:20] <leaftype> piperjon: I think you might want to be more specific than that
[21:21] <leaftype> RikMills: for that matter, I don't have the plasma integration addon in firefox, so I don't know how it's supposed to work.
[21:21] <cbreak> I use kde connect without the plasma integration
[21:22] <piperjon> When I booted up yesterday I found that my distro no longer has a release file, and I found a page via askubuntu which suggested I needed to upgrade from Impish Idri to Jammy Jellyfish. I went to a second page that gave me about 300 steps on how to achieve that.
[21:23] <leaftype> piperjon: upgrading from 21.10 to 22.04 should not take 300 steps
[21:23] <piperjon> I understand the need to upgrade, but I've only had ubuntu for around 3 months, and am still learning a lot.  Didn't quite expect this.
[21:24] <piperjon>  Well I may be exaggerating the number of course, but it appeared a bit more involved than I was anticipating.
[21:24] <leaftype> piperjon: sudo apt update ** sudo apt dist-upgrade
[21:25] <piperjon> omg, really? That's all there is to it?
[21:25] <piperjon> As you can tell I have a LOT to learn.
[21:25] <leaftype> been awhile since I did it that way, let me check
[21:26] <leaftype> btw, it's supposed to be &&
[21:26] <leaftype> not **
[21:26] <piperjon> The page I found had discrete instructions for updatin the kernel, along with a variety of other things that made my eyes jiggle a bit
[21:26] <leaftype> oh god, don't do that
[21:27] <piperjon> And that's exactly why I started looking for other answers.  Fortunately, I found you, and I GREATLY appreciate your patience.
[21:27] <leaftype> I haven't upgraded the whole distro via KDE's 'Discover' package manager yet, but in theory it should be able to
[21:29] <leaftype> ah, "do-release-upgrade -d"
[21:29] <leaftype> sudo apt update && sudo do-release-upgrade
[21:30] <leaftype> that should do the trick
[21:30] <leaftype> still, let me check how to do it graphically, because that's probably the more normal way
[21:31] <piperjon> Thank you so much!
[21:32] <piperjon> This also helped me to understand HOW to ask a question on such things, too, so you have helped in more ways than one.
[21:32] <leaftype> glad to hear it
[21:34] <leaftype> if you load up "discover", and click update, does it offer to upgrade to 22.04?
[21:34] <leaftype> you might like this too: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/JammyUpgrades/Kubuntu
[21:36] <piperjon> it didn't yesterday nor today when I just tried, Discover was where it said that I didn't have a release file, and did not give me an option to upgrade. That's what started the whole scary bunny hole I went down
[21:36] <leaftype> gotcha
[21:37] <piperjon> It was very dark down there, lol
[21:37] <leaftype> lol
[21:37] <leaftype> one of the big issues with linux in general is trying to figure things out by jumping down giant rabbit holes
[21:37] <leaftype> it's something that shouldn't ever happen, but for some reason it often does
[21:38] <piperjon> Yeah, and while I'm more technologically savvy than some, I"m such a rank noob at all things Linux that I really feel lost some times, and then I find that big ol bunny hole.  No bueno.
[21:39] <leaftype> I think it's easier for techy  people in general to get wrapped up in random details until they're way beyond their knowledge
[21:39] <piperjon> I think you may be right.
[21:40] <piperjon> I took a quick gander at that website you sent, it is SO much less terrifying than the other I'd found.  No kernel update or anything. Woo!
[21:40] <piperjon> I super do appreciate your help!
[21:40] <leaftype> in the ubuntu land, it's generally safer to stick to the long term support releases (LTS). They come out every 2 years, and they're supported for 5 years each
[21:40] <leaftype> 22.04 is going to be like that
[21:40] <leaftype> which is what you're updating to :)
[21:41] <piperjon> Excellent, that makes me happy.  By then I should be able to hold my own in the Ubuntu world, I'd like to think.
[21:42] <piperjon> Meanwhile time for me to roll. I am very grateful for your help today, if I had a Venosaur Rare Holo Shadowless I would totally share with you.  :)
[21:42] <leaftype> sure thing :)
[21:42] <piperjon> TTFN
[23:00] <mparillo> The LTS core packages are supported for five years, but I believe all the DEs supported by the Flavours are only supported for three years.
[23:39] <adrianjohnhartun> hello