/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/08/23/#ubuntu-devel.txt

mwhudsonmwhudson@anduril:~/ubuntu/logs$ apt-cache show libstdc++6 | grep -E '^Package|Description-en'00:25
mwhudsonPackage: libstdc++600:25
mwhudsonDescription-en: GNU Standard C++ Library v300:25
eoli3nHi mardy09:36
eoli3ni'm back to work, i really need to find a way to fix firefox09:36
eoli3nhttps://forum.snapcraft.io/t/cannot-open-path-of-the-current-working-directory-permission-denied-bis/28704/4109:36
eoli3ncan we take some time on this, if you have some I will answer as quickly as I can09:37
eoli3nI need to fix this before the end of the week, to be able to start migrating ~800 desktop next week09:37
=== Fallen is now known as Fallen[m]
=== Fallen[m] is now known as Fallen
ahasenackUnit193: are you planning on updating wireguard in debian before ubuntu's feature freeze?12:18
=== luis220413_ is now known as luis220413
eoli3nmardy should I set no_root_squash option client or server side ?12:37
eoli3nwhen i add this client side in autofs config and restart autofs/umount user home, then remount, the option seems ignore12:38
eoli3nd12:38
enr0nI am looking for a sponsor for bug 1860568, which is a left over from my +1 shift a couple weeks ago13:54
ubottuBug 1860568 in dtfabric (Ubuntu) "fails autopkgtest on s390x" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186056813:54
jawn-smithDid an AA remove my busybox upload from kinetic-proposed? It was there yesterday and now it's gone14:45
ginggsjawn-smith: it's migrating...14:47
jawn-smithoh, that's surprising cause there was still a failed autopkgtest14:48
jawn-smithoh yeah there it is, "will attempt migration due to a hint"14:48
ginggszfs-linux?14:48
jawn-smithThanks ginggs! Yeah, zfs-linux14:48
jawn-smithI missed that there was a hint for that14:48
enr0nbdmurray: The systemd amd64 autopkgtest passed on staging. Would you prefer to try the remaining arches there before re-triggering in the production autopkgtest environment?14:54
nibbon_o/15:16
nibbon_is there a way to change the compression of a .deb generated by dkms mkbmdeb?15:17
athosamurray: hi! I am wondering if it would be OK to sync redis 7.x from debian or if there is some special reason to keep it in 6.x for kinetic15:19
xnoxnibbon_:  because you need different one?15:27
xnoxnibbon_:  normally one would produce those inside schroot created by mk-sbuild such that they are compatible with a target release.15:27
bdmurrayenr0n: Is the PPA upload something that'll eventually go to release? I mean could you get what you are looking for by using staging? It'd be faster than waiting for the production queues to be consumed.15:32
enr0nYes, these are pre-upload checks for merging 251.4 from debian. slyon went ahead and triggered the tests though, except for armhf.15:38
ginggsathos: i'd say redis looks good for a sync, it's in universe and CVE-2022-0543 is fixed in the debian changelog15:41
ubottuIt was discovered, that redis, a persistent key-value database, due to a packaging issue, is prone to a (Debian-specific) Lua sandbox escape, which could result in remote code execution. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-0543>15:41
enr0nbdmurray: so if we could trigger the armhf test on staging that would be good15:42
bdmurrayenr0n: that is done15:44
enr0nbdmurray: thanks!15:44
athosginggs: thanks! That's what I have been thinking! Just wondered it would be nice to ask before sync'ing to ensure there's no other reason it wasn't sync'd yet apart from that CVE16:57
nibbon_xnox: yeah, I have a repository that doesn't support the default tar compression. Right now I'm using an ugly hack - unpacking and repacking passing -Zxz - but I wanted to know whether there an option or a env variable I can pass to dkms17:05
xnoxnibbon_:  best option to open a feature request to https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues17:09
nibbon_oic, I hope there was a special spell to cast 🙄 ... alrighty then, I'll open a feature request with them. Thx17:13
Unit193ahasenack: I think that's unlikely.17:44
ahasenackok18:36
luis220413How can I get the build status of multiple packages in the development release at once?18:59
luis220413Specifically, I want to know which Haskell packages are failing to build.18:59
Unit193ahasenack: Why do you ask?19:00
ahasenackbecause the version we have is from september 202119:00
ahasenackalmost a year old, assuming there is a new one out there19:01
Unit193If there was a new one, I'd have picked it up.  It's just the tests pending right now.19:02
ahasenackyeah, just checked, looks like the latest tag: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-tools/tags19:02
ahasenackso n/m19:02
Unit1931. The "This package is out of date, email the maintainer!" would have notified me.  2. I have uscan --report run over all of my packages every three days, I'd know. :319:03
jbichaluis220413: click the good checkbox at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ghc.html19:03
sarnoldthat's cool19:04
luis220413This build is blocking several packages: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-lua/2.1.0+ds1-2/+build/2423398519:46
luis220413Actually, all builds for this source package19:46
vorlonluis220413: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/html/ghc.html is the best overview; I am working through the necessary rebuilds19:46
luis220413Thanks!19:47
=== justache is now known as justache_
=== justache_ is now known as justache
luis220413However, this build was retried before that of haskell-tasty, causing dependency failures.19:49
luis220413vorlon: However, these builds (of haskell-lua) was retried before those of haskell-tasty, causing dependency errors.19:49
luis220413*were19:49
vorlonluis220413: someone retried all the failed package builds; there's no logs to say who did this.  I am building the packages in order.19:51
luis220413Thanks!19:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!