[14:59] o/ [14:59] o/ [14:59] o/ [15:00] o/ [15:00] #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team [15:00] Meeting started at 15:00:15 UTC. The chair is juliank. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [15:00] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [15:00] o/ [15:00] #topic Lightning Round [15:00] o/ [15:01] juliank: i think you mean https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-25-august-2022/ [15:01] #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-25-august-2022/ [15:01] yeah [15:01] let's have ourselves sometime to look at this and ask questions [15:04] I like the first line in dbungert's status [15:04] Maybe the second one too [15:04] congrats to dbungert [15:05] juliank: thanks! [15:05] bdmurray: I will be clicking tests for a while to catch up with how many you ran for me [15:06] in before bdmurray says you shouldn't be clicking, but rather using retry-autopkgtest-regressions [15:07] ;-) [15:09] #topic Release incoming bugs [15:09] #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:09] bug 1699942 is actually raised by me [15:09] Bug 1699942 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "network-manager fails to deprecate addresses" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1699942 [15:10] So IPv6 routes get advertised by the router as invalid, but NM does not remove them, it just sets their TTL to 1s [15:10] s/routes/prefixes/ [15:10] Well the /128 prefix is around all the time [15:10] I actually lost IRC a couple minutes ago as the route broke :D [15:11] systemd looks the same [15:11] I don't know what's actually reading the router advertisements? [15:11] Not a regression, bug was around in xenial [15:13] added a linux task, we believe that's what's handling the RAs [15:14] bug 1981109 [15:14] Bug 1981109 in modemmanager (Ubuntu) "server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in every container" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1981109 [15:14] IIRC the remaining task is for desktop [15:15] vorlon: is there anything left? [15:16] juliank: livecd-rootfs is being SRUed to jammy, I think the rls-kk-incoming task could be dropped (or the bug could just be targeted to kinetic since livecd-rootfs was uploaded there) [15:18] ack [15:18] bug 1097467 [15:18] Bug 1097467 in bash (Ubuntu) "bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1097467 [15:18] R alpha-1 would be like Raring? [15:19] further discussion to happen [15:19] #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:19] bug 1986648 [15:19] Bug 1986648 in rustc (Ubuntu) "rustc 1.61 and cargo 0.62 required by firefox 105" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1986648 [15:20] schopin: ^ [15:20] Yes, this needs carding as I'm guessing it will take a bit of time. [15:20] on it ;) [15:20] thanks :) [15:21] bug 1981721 [15:21] Bug 1981721 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "dual port SRIOV NIC with 64 VFs per PF is not configured with switchdev eswitch mode" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1981721 [15:21] let's skip this ^ [15:21] no updates yet [15:21] bug 1979825 [15:21] Bug 1979825 in amd64-microcode (Ubuntu) "Please consider shipping April 2022 microcode updates" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1979825 [15:21] probably should jfdi [15:21] isn't that done? [15:22] there was an update recently [15:22] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/3.20220809.0ubuntu1 [15:22] ah, in kinetic, needs sru [15:22] amd, not intel [15:22] ah yes [15:22] let's card this [15:22] ahh [15:22] I tagged the bug in part because I think something is missing process wise [15:23] Revert to 3.20180524.1 version of microcode because of regressions on [15:23] certain hardware. (LP: #1853614) [15:23] Launchpad bug 1853614 in amd64-microcode (Ubuntu) "System stuck in reboot loop on AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853614 [15:23] is in bioinic [15:23] probably should be checked if that was fixed [15:23] someone needs to monitor amd microcode updates, I suppose [15:24] or at least when merging, SRU it / create a bug? [15:24] I wonder if there is a mailing list or announcement mechanism similar to tzdata [15:25] linux-firmware@kernel.org [15:25] no? [15:26] Anyway, lets not hold up the meeting [15:26] Anyhow should be carded and comment added to investigate how to deal better [15:26] mclemenceau: are you carding? [15:27] sure thing [15:27] #topic Team proposed-migration report [15:27] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs [15:27] um [15:28] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs [15:28] vorlon: [15:28] let's see how bad things are on the eve of FF [15:28] as I go through these, if it's a merge you've touched recently, please speak up and take the package to follow through on [15:28] very bad [15:29] lintian: still blocked on an ongoing MIR [15:29] ginggs: are you still driving this? [15:29] ah looks like all the open tasks are assigned elsewhere now, mostly to MIR team members [15:29] vorlon: it's now in review by mir team [15:29] but won't make it before FF [15:30] slyon: is the MIR team aiming to approve it after FF? [15:30] vorlon: yes. we might want to file a FFe for it then [15:30] update-notifier was my upload [15:30] mutt is also blocked by MIR, looks like it's had server team review but I'm not sure where in the process this is currently [15:31] i offered to file an FFe, but is it required? lintian was upload before FF [15:31] I would say no to an FFe for lintian, which is particularly a developer-oriented tool anyway [15:31] I thought FFe weren't necessary for MIRs? [15:31] vorlon: mutt was stuck on security review. but got a recent update, so we might be able to unblock it [15:32] vorlon: no as in not needed, or no as in no exception granted? [15:32] ginggs: no as in not needed [15:32] vorlon: thanks for clarifying [15:32] schopin: if the MIR is to enable turning on a new feature that hasn't been turned on yet, it's arguable there should be a FF. But we also generally for things that have been uploaded to -proposed before FF don't require MIR [15:33] for mutt, looks like we're ready to promote gsasl & libntlm, but might still need to drop/revert the libgssglue dependency to get it resolved [15:33] gcc-12 being built on arm64 is holding a few things up (gcc-12-cross -> gcc-defaults), but the build is in progress, so assuming this will shake out [15:34] rustc is just waiting for glibc [15:34] libuv1: that was mentioned in the weekly report [15:34] enr0n: will you be able to follow through on this? [15:35] vorlon: Yes I am working on it today. Bug 1987558 has a patch for siridb-server [15:35] Bug 1987558 in siridb-server (Debian) "libuv1 breaks siridb-server autopkgtest: test times out" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987558 [15:35] libuv1: enr0n: [15:35] thanks [15:35] no problem [15:35] psycopg2: was assigned to bdrung but it appears he went on PTO before getting to it so we need a new volunteer [15:36] alexghiti: can you take this? [15:36] Ack [15:36] thanks [15:37] netkit-telnetd: MIR team seems to be suggestion demotion, which I'm unsure about [15:37] vorlon: It was not in main before AFAICT [15:37] telnet is present as a Recommends: of ubuntu-standard [15:37] (like before the rename) [15:38] and it is a common network debugging tool [15:38] also IIUC it is about to be dropped from ubuntu-standard (ubuntu-meta) [15:38] why do you say that? [15:38] dropping it from standard is the sort of thing that should be discussed on ubuntu-devel, I haven't seen discussion there [15:38] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plzip/+bug/1980663/comments/6 [15:38] Launchpad bug 1980663 in netkit-telnet (Ubuntu) "[MIR] false-positives, do not promote" [Undecided, Triaged] [15:39] that's what jbicha suggested [15:39] ok I think he meant telnetd [15:39] probably correct [15:39] I'll take this one to follow through on [15:39] thanks [15:39] lbnss-db, just waiting on glibc [15:39] python-secretstorage: juliank can you take this? [15:40] git: I merged it, I'll follow through [15:40] ack [15:40] isc-dhcp: waiting for glibc [15:40] netplan.io: slyon can you take? [15:40] yes [15:41] (already resolved with upstream NM, actually) [15:41] perfect, thanks [15:42] slyon: so I just looked, and the issue is that the telnet binary has moved from netkit-telnet source to inetutils source [15:42] lsb: my merge, I'll take it [15:42] openssh: my merge, I'll take that too [15:42] vorlon: yes, it has been discussed here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plzip/+bug/1980663/comments/4 [15:42] Launchpad bug 1980663 in netkit-telnet (Ubuntu) "[MIR] false-positives, do not promote" [Undecided, Triaged] [15:43] there's some more related comments on that bug report [15:45] slyon: right. telnetd should clearly be demoted, netkit-telnet does not satisfy the existing Recommends on telnet, we should reintroduce telnet as a transitional package otherwise users don't get netkit-telnet on upgrade [15:45] I'll follow through on that then [15:46] update-motd vs update-notifier: dbungert ? [15:46] vorlon: ack [15:47] glibc: I continue playing whack-a-mole with autopkgtest false positives, and I believe mwhudson and schopin are still on top of the true positives [15:47] * schopin nods [15:47] cross-toolchain-base vs kmod: ginggs ? [15:47] vorlon: ack [15:47] diffutils just waiting for autopkgtest results [15:48] and it's my merge [15:48] err, sync [15:48] but i'll keep an eye on diffutils [15:48] ginggs: actually there are a number of kmod-related autopkgtest failures, can you take the lot please? [15:49] vorlon: sure [15:49] ginggs: and cross-toolchain-base is also blocking procps, so if you could look at that at the same time? [15:49] there's an update excuse bug about kmod: LP: #1987620 (it was my merge) [15:49] Launchpad bug 1987620 in kmod (Ubuntu) "kmod v30 missing new modules.builtin.modinfo file" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987620 [15:49] likely a common failure cause [15:50] vorlon: yes, i'll take procps as well [15:50] and livecd-rootfs is an unrelated blocker for procps; bdmurray can you look at this? [15:50] and then that's the list for today [15:50] #topic AOB [15:53] I'm out tomorrow [15:54] Anyone else out? [15:56] Most already are :) [15:58] #endmeeting [15:58] Meeting ended at 15:58:06 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-08-25-15.00.moin.txt === arraybolt3 is now known as Guest3 === Guest3 is now known as arraybolt3 === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung