| Unit193 | teward: Did you clean up https://github.com/lubuntu-team/pastebinit, or is something force pushing there? | 01:41 |
|---|---|---|
| teward | i think something's force pushing | 02:45 |
| teward | Unit193: that repo is not going to be the primary repo as soon as Simon gives me comaintainer on the package in Salsa | 02:45 |
| Unit193 | Well if you didn't, then obviously yeah. I do appreciate that one, but... | 02:45 |
| teward | we're gonna move it out of whatever is force-pushing | 02:45 |
| teward | but i've also been spending the past ~12hours getting my new laptop set up with stuff | 02:45 |
| teward | like right now only NOW I'm getting to the irccloud and stuff setups xD | 02:46 |
| Unit193 | Having it on GH makes more sense as upstream than on salsa, fwiw. You can have the opensuse person make patches. | 02:46 |
| teward | Unit193: oh definitely, but I mean, not in lubuntu-team/pastebinit | 02:46 |
| Unit193 | Yeah not the best. :P | 02:46 |
| teward | i've already got SImon's OK to do so | 02:46 |
| teward | and also got his ack to add myself to uploaders if he goes and does his dcut commands | 02:46 |
| teward | but right now i'm staring the "you're screwed" problem of needing my key signed again for a new key in debian-keyring. Because new smartcard. | 02:47 |
| teward | (and because there's no USB-A ports in the computer and my USB-A yubikey is replaced by a usb-c one) | 02:47 |
| Unit193 | https://github.com/Unit193/pastebinit/commits/master has a couple more now too. | 02:47 |
| teward | .. well that took an hour to shrink the filesystem geez. | 03:06 |
| === pizzaiolo is now known as pizza | ||
| utkarsh2102 | jbicha: hey! your upload for glib-networking is failing autopkgtest. D'you have time to look at it, please? | 08:30 |
| utkarsh2102 | let me know otherwise. | 08:31 |
| utkarsh2102 | bah, armhf builders have died at this point. (: | 08:42 |
| alexghiti | Hi everyone, can someone with enough rights trigger the rebuild of psycopg2 package? It failed 2 weeks ago because it lacked dependencies that landed a few days back so that should be enough: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psycopg2/2.9.3-1 | 08:45 |
| alexghiti | Thanks! | 08:45 |
| schopin_ | alexghiti: on it | 08:48 |
| === schopin_ is now known as schopin | ||
| alexghiti | schopin: Thanks! | 08:50 |
| jbicha | utkarsh2102: feel free to take a look. There was only one commit that apparently triggered the test failures https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib-networking/-/commits/glib-2-72/ | 12:26 |
| === ginggs_ is now known as ginggs | ||
| Md | is there a way to NOT install the ubuntu-server package with the new automatic installer? I cannot find anything related in the autoinstall reference documentation | 14:08 |
| enr0n | I am looking for a core dev to sponsor bug 1987850 | 15:25 |
| ubottu | Bug 1987850 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "pcre2 10.40-1 causes siridb-server FTBFS on ppc64el" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987850 | 15:25 |
| schopin | enr0n: I'll take a look :) | 15:27 |
| luis220413 | I found another component mismatch, this time in Ubuntu 20.04: ubuntu-standard (main) depends on dnsutils (universe). However, bind9-dnsutils provides dnsutils. | 15:28 |
| luis220413 | One of my queestions remains unanswered: What is the best way to propose that a package be seeded in an Ubuntu flavor (including Desktop and Server but not Core)? | 15:30 |
| luis220413 | *questions | 15:31 |
| luis220413 | Can anyone from the MIR team tell the correct owning team for bug 1986592 and the subordinate MIRs? | 15:33 |
| ubottu | Bug 1986592 in network-manager-openconnect (Ubuntu) "[MIR] network-manager-openconnect" [Low, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1986592 | 15:33 |
| luis220413 | I mean the MIR approval team | 15:33 |
| enr0n | schopin: thanks! | 15:34 |
| Odd_Bloke | luis220413: The `Provides: dnsutils` in main means there isn't a component mismatch: I can install `ubuntu-standard` with only `main` enabled. | 15:37 |
| === justDeez is now known as justache | ||
| enr0n | Can a core dev please retry autopkgtest from `retry-autopkgtest-regressions --log-regex "Removing sudo" --blocks systemd -s kinetic`? These needed a glibc trigger (for 2.36-0ubuntu2), and should be OK now that glibc 2.36-0ubuntu2 is in the release pocket. | 19:13 |
| enr0n | And, can a MOTU or core dev please retry this build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/siridb-server/2.0.48-1/+build/24315647 ? It should be able to build now with pcre2 10.40-1ubuntu1 in -proposed. | 19:18 |
| kanashiro[m] | enr0n: re-triggered the tests for you | 19:40 |
| enr0n | kanashiro[m]: thanks! | 19:40 |
| kanashiro[m] | and the package you mentioned built fine already | 19:40 |
| enr0n | Not sure if you're saying that it was you who re-tried it, but thanks if you did (I see it was re-tried ~20 minutes ago). | 19:51 |
| kanashiro[m] | no, I did not :) maybe someone else | 20:02 |
| jbicha | doko: how do you suggest we handle Debian bug 1015556 in Ubuntu? | 20:22 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 1015556 in src:network-manager "network-manager: ftbfs with LTO (link time optimization) enabled" [Minor, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1015556 | 20:22 |
| jbicha | doko: I guess we should just keep doing what we've been doing in Ubuntuu's NM, just add --enable-lto | 20:23 |
| tobi | I maintain gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar in Debian and upstream got a bug reported that the package is no longer available in 22.04 ... Is there a way to find out the reason for the removal? | 21:05 |
| Unit193 | "remove the extensions that need updating for the new gnome shell series" is why it was removed from jammy. | 21:06 |
| Unit193 | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar/+publishinghistory | 21:06 |
| tobi | ok, thanks. however its compatible with gnome 42 :) | 21:10 |
| tobi | (as its d/control correctly declares) | 21:10 |
| Unit193 | At the time of the removal, I imagine it didn't? How is it with 43? | 21:11 |
| tobi | one thing that catches my eye: there was recently a epoch introduced in the package... I only see versions with the old version scheme in that list… Could the epoch be an issue? | 21:11 |
| Unit193 | https://sources.debian.org/src/gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar/1%3A108-1/debian/control/#L14 seems to say that 43 should work? If so, I can sync it now so it'll at least be in kinetic. | 21:12 |
| tobi | 42 for sure. IIRC 1:107-1 was already ok with 42. For 43, It is very *likely* that 1:108-1 will work with Gnome 43, but it is not tested yet. I think 43 lands in Debian sid these days, afterwards I can confirm it will work with 43. | 21:15 |
| Unit193 | !info gnome-shell kinetic | 21:16 |
| ubottu | gnome-shell (43~beta-1ubuntu1, kinetic): graphical shell for the GNOME desktop. In component main, is optional. Built by gnome-shell. Size 847 kB / 3,924 kB. (Only available for linux-any.) | 21:16 |
| Unit193 | I'm hesitent to sync it if you're not sure, sooo... | 21:16 |
| Unit193 | (If I had GNOME or a clue about it, I'd simply have tested for you.) | 21:17 |
| jbicha | tobi: most GNOME Shell extensions have been removed from Ubuntu. See https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/removal-of-gnome-shell-extension-from-universe-and-stop-auto-syncs/18437/9 | 21:18 |
| jbicha | this was a compromise to allow us to provide new point releases (like 42.2 to 42.3) of gnome-shell while meeting expectations that things in Ubuntu wouldn't break because of updates | 21:19 |
| jbicha | and allowing us a manageable amount of extensions to test | 21:19 |
| jbicha | Unit193: it's been blacklisted so you would have gotten an error if you tried to syncpackage it | 21:21 |
| Unit193 | Yeah thought about checking that list since it didn't make it back in yet, didn't know if there'd have been a hangup from the last removal and forgotten though. | 21:21 |
| tobi | jbicha: :-| Actually this extension has a lots of users, they will not like this. | 21:21 |
| Unit193 | tobi: A lot of feedback from users is a good way to let devs know they did the wrong thing. | 21:22 |
| tobi | But thanks for the link, I'll post it in the upstream bug report. | 21:22 |
| jbicha | tobi: I added it to the 22.04 LTS Release Notes and I haven't really heard much complaining đŸ¤· | 21:23 |
| jbicha | it's a nice extension. I used it to give my GNOME 43 demo talk at debconf to get rid of all the Ubuntu chrome to focus on the full screen GNOME Boxes VMs of Debian | 21:23 |
| jbicha | but I was able to easily install it with gnome-shell-extension-manager. I didn't need a Debian package for the extension | 21:24 |
| tobi | jbicha: this is actually a constant source of frustation upstream, and upstream was very happy that /me suggested to document to use the packaged version. People constantly installed non-compatible versions and complained about not working... | 21:25 |
| jbicha | being stuck on say gnome-shell 42.1 when 42.6 is available with lots of bugfixes is a real problem too | 21:27 |
| jbicha | GNOME Shell has gone back to enforcing the extension metadata versions by default; maybe that helps with earlier breakage that annoyed upstream? | 21:29 |
| tobi | one will see, I guess. I'll just report the news to upstream and consider this topic closed for me. | 21:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!