[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpma [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[00:23] <amurray> RAOF: hi ☺️ it's intel-microcode update time again and the security team would like to publish them via -proposed -> -updates -> -security for B/F/J - could you please approve them out unapproved to go to -proposed? thanks 🙏
[00:26]  * RAOF looks
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-microcode [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.20220809.0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-microcode [source] (focal-proposed) [3.20220809.0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[00:38] <RAOF> 🤣 Another SGX bypass!
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-microcode [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.20220809.0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[00:39] <RAOF> amurray:  Accepted into -proposed. Note that release into focal-updates will need coordination with the release team (unless I've missed the focal point release has now been released email)
[00:40] <amurray> RAOF: yep, we're not in a rush for these so I plan to wait until the point release is out to ask for sponsoring them to -updates - thanks again
[02:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-objectorientation [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-classes [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-objectorientation [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-classes [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-classes [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-objectorientation [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-classes [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-objectorientation [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-classes [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-classes [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-classes [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-classes [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-objectorientation [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-classes [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-objectorientation [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-classes [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-objectorientation [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-objectorientation [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[02:43] <blackboxsw> RAOF: not sure if you are pulling SRU vanguard duties for reviewing the -proposed queue. We'd like to start testing cloud-init uploads in from the unapproved queue for an SRU and have missed a couple of vanguards due to  PTO. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318. Our uploads are still sitting in unapproved state.
[02:44] <blackboxsw> I think James added the verification-needed* tags manually, but we still haven't had review on the original unapproved -proposed uploads
[02:52] <RAOF> blackboxsw: I'm not technically vanguard today, but I can give those a review.
[03:06] <blackboxsw> many thanks RAOF. I think our queries earlier were either misinterpreted or folks didn't have a chance to during designated vanguard days.
[03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-objectorientation [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[03:21] <RAOF> I'm generally pretty happy to be pinged with SRU stuff whenever. (At the moment! This may change if lots of people start pinging me 😉)
[03:39] <RAOF> blackboxsw: I've got a couple of questions: 1) It looks like the `debian/changelog` is missing some rececent entries; concerningly, it seems to miss the changelog for most recent security upload, (2) Is dropping the debug module a non-backwards-compatible change?
[03:56] <falcojr> ROAF: what do you mean by recent entries? If you're referring to e.g., 22.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.2, that was part of a hotfix branch that is independent from our 22.3 branch and we're told previously we don't need to merge that changelog in as the commit is now represented in the upstream snapshot.
[03:56] <falcojr> or was there something else missing
[04:01] <falcojr> as for the debug question, I guess technically it is, but the behavior is disabled by default and completely replaced by running "cloud-init query --all" instead
[04:10] <RAOF> falcojr: Yeah, I was referring to 22.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.3 & .2
[04:10] <RAOF> Just to be clear, the uploads do include the fix from the most recent -security uploads?
[04:11] <RAOF> Or I guess could check for myself. 😃
[04:15] <RAOF> falcojr: The uploads do not appear to include the fix for bug #1978422. From what I can see, this shouldn't be a problem if people are upgrading from the package in -security, but if they're upgrading from release they won't get that fix.
[04:25] <falcojr> RAOF: We strip all other bug references from the changelog due to the overarching SRU bug. In e.g., jammy, that bug is represented by commit 4d467b14 . If you search for the bug number in the git log you can see it
[04:27] <RAOF> I'm inspecting the diff from what's in -security to what's in -unapproved, and the package in -unapproved does not have the postinst change.
[04:32] <falcojr> Gotcha, I get what you're saying now
[04:32] <blackboxsw> RAOF: falcojr yep I think we needed to specifically pull in the posinst changes from our hotfix branches into bionic proper. maybe even the debian/changelogs which were already "released" though thats not strictly necessary
[04:33] <blackboxsw>  git diff upstream/ubuntu/bionic-22.2-hotfix debian/cloud-init.postinst | pastebinit
[04:33] <blackboxsw> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/xGv5DZKBnB/
[04:33] <blackboxsw> I think we can probably reject this -proposed upload RAOF and we'll get you a new -proposed upload that accounts for our hotfix debian packaging changes which didn't make it into this new upload.
[04:34] <blackboxsw> sound good falcojr ?
[04:34] <RAOF> 👍️
[04:34] <falcojr> 👍
[04:34] <blackboxsw> ok thx for the catch RAOF
[04:34] <blackboxsw> <- calls it a night
[04:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-objectorientation [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[04:42] <teward[m]> *hands RAOF (he/they) a cup of coffee*
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-aeson [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-packaging [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-aeson [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-aeson [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-packaging [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-packaging [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-packaging [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-aeson [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-aeson [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-aeson [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-aeson [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-packaging [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-packaging [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-aeson [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-packaging [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-packaging [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[06:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-input-parsers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.2-2] (no packageset)
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-input-parsers [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.2-2] (no packageset)
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-input-parsers [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.2-2] (no packageset)
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-input-parsers [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.3.2-2]
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-input-parsers [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.3.2-2]
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-input-parsers [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.3.2-2]
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-path [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-version [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-path [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-version [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-version [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-path [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-path [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-version [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-version [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hslua-module-path [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-path [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-path [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-path [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-version [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-version [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-path [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-version [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-version [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-path [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hslua-module-version [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.2-3]
[12:26] <xnox> apw:  vorlon: can you please remove kernel NBS from kinetic-proposed for the superseded ABIs? https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/6V6YhNy9jP/
[12:26] <apw> xnox, in progress
[13:07] <seb128> could someone trigger a desktop canary/kinetic/amd64 build?
[13:07] <seb128> bdmurray, ^
[13:14] <luis220413> I just finished my MIRs for network-manager-openconnect and its dependencies.
[13:14] <luis220413> Bug 1986592, bug 1987446, bug 1987447, bug 1987448, bug 1987571
[13:20] <luis220413> I also filed a bug to get this package to be a dependency of ubuntu-desktop.
[13:21] <luis220413> Bug 1987706
[13:22] <luis220413> What do you think?
[13:22] <luis220413> What do you think about the MIRs and the dependency addition?
[13:23] <luis220413> And what is the best way to get a package seeded in a Ubuntu flavor (including Desktop and Server but not Core)?
[13:26] <jbicha> luis220413: I've commented on your bugs now
[13:41] <Odd_Bloke> I've just discovered that in jammy ruby-xmlrpc (in main) started Depend'ing on ruby-webrick (in universe) after this SRU: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-xmlrpc/+bug/1978152
[13:45] <ahasenack> kanashiro: ^
[13:47] <Odd_Bloke> Which means with only main enabled, I get `ruby-xmlrpc : Depends: ruby-webrick but it is not installable`, I just confirmed.
[13:48] <Odd_Bloke> Looks like jammy promotion was skipped: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-webrick/+bug/1975523
[13:49] <Odd_Bloke> "The new ruby-xmlrpc did not cause any component mismatch in Jammy." <-- potentially a bug in the tooling used to determine this?  This seems like a pretty clear mismatch!
[13:49] <xnox> ubuntu-archive ^^^
[13:55] <Odd_Bloke> I've commented on the bug too (narrowly avoiding stepping on ahasenack's status change), but this does mean that `ruby` is uninstallable with only `main` ATM.
[13:55] <ahasenack> all the highlights were done, bug was updated, status set to high
[13:56] <Odd_Bloke> Thanks ahasenack!
[13:57] <ahasenack> thanks for letting us know
[13:57] <ahasenack> you should work here, have you considered applying? :)
[13:58] <Odd_Bloke> ^_^
[14:02] <xnox> ahasenack:  Odd_Bloke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW4Xg3hl3rE
[14:05] <Odd_Bloke> xnox: Beyonce - Break My Ruby Installation (Official Video)
[14:39] <kanashiro> Odd_Bloke, ahasenack at the time I was talking to Christian it did not cause any component mismatch, thanks for reporting this issue
[14:39] <kanashiro> all the paperwork is done, just need an AA to promote it
[14:39] <ahasenack> kanashiro: maybe it wasn't in updates yet, or the tooling does not consider -proposed
[14:40] <kanashiro[m]> yeah, not sure what happened there
[15:18] <seb128> bdmurray, unping, I'm not going to be able to do anything from a new build today at this point so that can wait for the next daily job
[15:55] <fheimes> hi, does someone with 'super-powers' have a minute to re-trigger four autopkgtests  for me?(https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/gBN5hnGcdW/)
[16:00] <vorlon> kanashiro[m], ahasenack, Odd_Bloke: ruby-webrick promoted in jammy-updates
[16:00] <ginggs> fheimes: looking
[16:01] <vorlon> kanashiro[m]: how did you determine that there was no component-mismatch for jammy?
[16:02] <kanashiro[m]> vorlon: I did not, Christian was looking at that
[16:02] <kanashiro[m]> Btw thanks for fixing it
[16:02] <vorlon> kanashiro[m]: oh? it's your comment on the bug log saying there was no component mismatch and no action was needed, /after/ Christian said there was a component mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-webrick/+bug/1975523/comments/6
[16:02] <ginggs> fheimes: .
[16:03] <fheimes> ginggs: tha
[16:06] <kanashiro[m]> vorlon: I added the comment after talking to him
[16:07] <vorlon> ah
[16:09] <vorlon> fyi y'all, I'm releasing glibc into kinetic release pocket now; the remaining autopkgtest regressions are either analyzed and in progress (llvm-toolchain-12,lxc), analyzed and low-impact (wcc), false-positives caused by britney triggering wrong things (libreoffice), long-running tests that require infrastructure tweaks (rustc), or weird reproducible failures that need investigating but at this
[16:09] <vorlon> point shouldn't block migration (pyfai)
[16:21] <Odd_Bloke> vorlon: Thank you!
[16:29] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu-archive please
[16:29] <LocutusOfBorg> old binaries left on riscv64: libnode93 (from 16.15.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1)
[16:37] <dudels> Please guide me to the correct channel for help after upgrade from 20.04.05.  No graphics, only term session
[16:43] <xnox> apw:  vorlon: linux-oem-5.17 should not exist in kinetic, and is currently blocking v5.19.0 kernel migration via LRM entanglement https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-signatures-oem-5.17/+bug/1987869
[16:44] <xnox> please remove the 5 oem-5.17 meta-packages, the linux-meta in kinetic-proposed should have the right oem-22.04 transitionals on it.
[16:48] <xnox> i believe the same story is with intel-iotg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-signatures-intel-iotg/+bug/1987870
[17:14] <xnox> oem-5.17 is straightforward; the other one is being discussed
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptostore [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:48] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done (and also reviewing other 'old binaries left' instances in update_excuses)
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptostore [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.2.0-2]
[17:54] <vorlon> xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-intel-iotg/+bug/1987870/comments/1 is a completely inscrutable comment.
[17:55] <vorlon> dudels: probably #ubuntu
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-commonmark-pandoc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-citeproc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-commonmark-pandoc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-commonmark-pandoc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-commonmark-pandoc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:29] <RikMills> I guess libsnapd-qt-2-1 needs demoting to universe in the same way the former libsnapd-qt1 was
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.6.1-3] (no packageset)
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-citeproc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0.1-3] (no packageset)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [22.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.3 => 22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [22.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.3 => 22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [22.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.3 => 22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[19:29] <blackboxsw> hi vorlon, if you SRU backup vanguard time today. We have a  review request for unapproved status for initial cloud-init SRU upload per https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987318. We're added back the missing  changelog entries and d/*postinst changes ChrisR reviewed yesterday which we had hot-fixed earlier this year on a previous release.
[19:30] <blackboxsw> *We've added back*
[21:05] <jbicha> vorlon: please remove wpewebkit from kinetic-proposed too
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-commonmark-pandoc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.2.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[21:23] <vorlon> jbicha: done
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu10]
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted compiz [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:0.9.14.1+22.04.20220820-0ubuntu1]
[21:50] <jbicha> bdmurray: there is only 1 relevant upstream bolt commit since 0.9.1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bolt/bolt/-/commit/c2c0ff077
[21:51] <jbicha> hardly time to get that into focal before 20.04.5 though, right?
[22:16] <jbicha> I don't have thunderbolt hardware so I can't fully test
[22:26] <arraybolt3[m]> jbicha: I think I know someone with thunderbolt hardware, hold on...
[22:30] <Eickmeyer[m]> jbicha: Kubuntu Focus computers have Thunderbolt hardware. We might be able to test that. Does this only apply to Focal?
[22:32] <Eickmeyer[m]> I will say we're encouraging our customers to move to Jammy at this point as Kubuntu 20.04 goes EOL in April.
[22:41] <jbicha> Eickmeyer[m]: have you seen any bolt crashes? Brian's concern is that there is a SRU stuck in phased-updates for focal
[22:41] <jbicha> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html
[22:43] <Eickmeyer[m]> jbicha: I just checked, and we have had no complaints about any crashing with bolt from our customer base or even internally.
[22:43] <Eickmeyer[m]> Doesn't mean they're not out there, but we haven't seen them.
[22:45] <vorlon> blackboxsw: hi, why is debian/patches/expire-on-hashed-users.patch applied as a Debian patch instead of part of the upstream release?  also, in reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CloudinitUpdates it appears links are supposed to be provided to results of integration tests when requesting the SRU and this has not been done? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CloudinitUpdates
[22:53] <falcojr> vorlon: we broke existing functionality, so the expire patches retain functionality for existing releases
[22:54] <falcojr> and tests haven't been run yet. We're wanting to get to proposed so we can start testing
[22:54] <vorlon> falcojr: so then this patch is a revert of an upstream change introduced in this version?
[22:54] <falcojr> vorlon: yes
[22:54] <vorlon> falcojr: ok, so the wiki page doesn't actually describe the process being followed?
[22:57] <jbicha> vorlon: looks like you get to rm wpewebkit again 😂
[22:57] <falcojr> vorlon: doesn't the qa process start once we're in proposed?
[22:59] <vorlon> jbicha: ugh, done
[23:00] <vorlon> falcojr: that depends, but it's important that the wiki page accurately reflect the process that's being followed so that the SRU team doesn't make assumptions about testing being done pre-upload when it hasn't
[23:01] <vorlon> falcojr: so if the testing is done post-upload, please update the wiki page to state this more clearly, before I proceed with accepting
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-citeproc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6.0.1-3]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-commonmark-pandoc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1.2-1]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-commonmark-pandoc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1.2-1]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.6.1-3]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.6.1-3]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-citeproc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.6.0.1-3]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-commonmark-pandoc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1.2-1]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-commonmark-pandoc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1.2-1]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.6.1-3]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-commonmark-pandoc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.2.1.2-1]
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-pandoc-lua-marshal [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.6.1-3]