[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-gi-gmodule [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-2] (no packageset) [00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-gi-gmodule [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-2] (no packageset) [00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-gi-gmodule [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-2] (no packageset) [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2] [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2] [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2] [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2] [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2] [02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2] [04:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-average (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.13.1-3] === ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung === Beret- is now known as Beret === Juan- is now known as Juan [20:15] /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:694:39: error: ‘(1.0e+0l / 3.0e+1)’ is not a constant expression [20:15] I beg your pardon [21:21] vorlon: result is rounding mode dependent? [21:22] mwhudson: does that change at runtime? [21:22] anyway this is on ppc64el so checking if it's an -O3 bug [21:22] vorlon: it can do, i'm just guessing [21:22] vorlon, w.r.t. nodejs migration, cwltool is autopkgtest sad on amd64, and the reason is ENORAM [21:22] E cwltool.errors.WorkflowException: Requested at least 1024 ram but only 1021 available [21:23] can we force-reset hint maybe? [21:23] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/amd64/c/cwltool/20220828_074858_a6130@/log.gz [21:23] LocutusOfBorg: as opposed to marking it as a big_package that gets more ram for its tests? [21:23] as you want sure! this requires in any case some action from your side, whatever is better feel free to do it please [21:23] vorlon: also 1.0e+0l is a long double right? those are funky on ppc64el (for now) [21:25] vorlon: although having that error on a header from libstdc++-12-dev is a bit special (i hadn't clocked the path) [21:26] big packages is probably better, but I don't know if other archs will be bitten by this soon [21:28] oh templates, never mind [22:08] vorlon, please let me know once you add to big_packages so I can retry the test! [22:09] LocutusOfBorg: done [22:10] thanks! retried [22:11] oh... it was already there for arm64 and ppc64el, this explains a lot [22:11] it would be awesome if britney could report "big package" near the autopkgtest result :) [22:17] vorlon, ruby-uglifier is affected by Debian: #981224 [22:17] Debian bug 981224 in src:ruby-uglifier "ruby-uglifier: FTBFS: tests fail: uglifier_spec.rb:383, uglifier_spec.rb:751" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/981224 [22:17] and node-source-map can migrate if we kick it out... [22:19] and the only reverse-deps nanoc is affected by Debian bug: #1013492 [22:19] Debian bug 1013492 in src:nanoc "nanoc: FTBFS: ERROR: Test 'ruby3.0' failed. Exiting." [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1013492 [23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librm (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+really2.1.4-0.1build1 => 2.2.2+really2.2.2-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)