[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-gi-gmodule [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-gi-gmodule [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-gi-gmodule [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2]
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2]
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2]
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2]
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2]
[02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-gi-gmodule [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.2-2]
[04:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-average (kinetic-proposed/primary) [0.13.1-3]
[20:15] <vorlon> /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:694:39: error: ‘(1.0e+0l / 3.0e+1)’ is not a constant expression
[20:15] <vorlon> I beg your pardon
[21:21] <mwhudson> vorlon: result is rounding mode dependent?
[21:22] <vorlon> mwhudson: does that change at runtime?
[21:22] <vorlon> anyway this is on ppc64el so checking if it's an -O3 bug
[21:22] <mwhudson> vorlon: it can do, i'm just guessing
[21:22] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, w.r.t. nodejs migration, cwltool is autopkgtest sad on amd64, and the reason is ENORAM
[21:22] <LocutusOfBorg> E         cwltool.errors.WorkflowException: Requested at least 1024 ram but only 1021 available
[21:23] <LocutusOfBorg> can we force-reset hint maybe?
[21:23] <LocutusOfBorg> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/amd64/c/cwltool/20220828_074858_a6130@/log.gz
[21:23] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: as opposed to marking it as a big_package that gets more ram for its tests?
[21:23] <LocutusOfBorg> as you want sure! this requires in any case some action from your side, whatever is better feel free to do it please
[21:23] <mwhudson> vorlon: also 1.0e+0l is a long double right? those are funky on ppc64el (for now)
[21:25] <mwhudson> vorlon: although having that error on a header from libstdc++-12-dev is a bit special (i hadn't clocked the path)
[21:26] <LocutusOfBorg> big packages is probably better, but I don't know if other archs will be bitten by this soon
[21:28] <mwhudson> oh templates, never mind
[22:08] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please let me know once you add to big_packages so I can retry the test!
[22:09] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done
[22:10] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks! retried
[22:11] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... it was already there for arm64 and ppc64el, this explains a lot
[22:11] <LocutusOfBorg> it would be awesome if britney could report "big package" near the autopkgtest result :)
[22:17] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ruby-uglifier is affected by Debian: #981224
[22:17] <LocutusOfBorg> and node-source-map can migrate if we kick it out...
[22:19] <LocutusOfBorg> and the only reverse-deps nanoc is affected by Debian bug: #1013492
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librm (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.2.2+really2.1.4-0.1build1 => 2.2.2+really2.2.2-0ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)