[10:28] <bluca> enr0n: I noticed you synced systemd 251.4-1 from salsa
[10:28] <bluca> be aware that the .links approach in systemd-resolved had issues and installation was failing when /etc/resolv.conf was bind-mounted (chroot, container, etc)
[10:28] <bluca> I'd recommend to sync to 251.4-3
[10:32] <laney> nishit__: heya, are you aware of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1988119 by any chance? i'm getting a bit of 🔥 due to it
[10:33] <laney> it seems to be having a big impact on azure, wondering if you would have any opinion on us backing it out to stop the bleeding?
[10:33] <laney> or any info if it's being looked into elsewhere
[10:33] <laney> (brb)
[10:48] <slyon> bluca: hey! I reviewed your systemd-repart merge-proposal, thanks for that! And prepared all the changes around it. I have one last question: Why is libssl-dev added as a build dependency? That seems to be unrelated... https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/427557 Otherwise it looked good and all tests passed
[10:49] <slyon> I will be rolling it into the currently pending SRU for Jammy, once that question is resolved
[10:51] <sil2100> laney: I proposed to seb128 already that I could revert that systemd -security update to -proposed for now
[10:51] <sil2100> Won't help that much but always something
[10:51] <bluca> slyon: at the time it was required for an hmac calculation
[10:51] <bluca> in the latest version we removed that and used a simpler implementation
[10:52] <bluca> would you prefer me to backport some patches to do the same?
[10:53] <slyon> bluca: no, just having the rational should be good enough. If you could point me to those changes/commits (so I can add it as a reference to my merge-proposal comment), that'd be great!
[10:53] <bluca> sure, give me a sec
[10:53] <slyon> thanks!
[10:53] <laney> sil2100: sounds good, I think the main issue is at upgrade time (reboot seems to fix it) so probably the best we can do right now
[10:53] <bluca> btw since you just joined the channel, repeating:
[10:53] <bluca> I noticed you synced systemd 251.4-1 from salsa
[10:54] <laney> sil2100: do you want to handle the commands or me?
[10:54] <bluca> be aware that the .links approach in systemd-resolved had issues and installation was failing when /etc/resolv.conf was bind-mounted (chroot, container, etc)
[10:54] <bluca> I'd recommend to sync to 251.4-3
[10:54] <slyon> cc enr0n ^ (wrt systemd-resolved on 251.4)
[10:54] <sil2100> laney: eeek, if you have the time, could you do that? Since I have to handle an interview in 5 minutes, worried that I'll just hastily do stuff and f**k up
[10:55] <slyon> thanks for the heads-up, bluca!
[10:55] <laney> sure
[10:55] <laney> well it's probably equivalent to my rustiness on the tools :D
[10:55] <bluca> slyon: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/ade99252e2cdd9eeff78566789008996d27e4dc0
[10:56] <sil2100> laney: I have the cmdline for moving the update to -proposed, but the removals and copy-from-same will need to be done still
[10:56] <laney> yup, feel free to run the move
[10:56] <laney> I'll do the others
[10:57] <sil2100> laney: okay, done! And thanks ;)
[10:59] <laney> sil2100: np, happy interview!
[11:04] <laney> okay, should be reverting. sorry if I messed anything up 🙃
[11:07] <slyon> bluca: thanks! I think it's all prepared now: https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/427557/comments/1135060 pushed to https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/log/?h=ubuntu-jammy
[11:07] <slyon> FYI: enr0n will be driving the Jammy SRU, as I'll be out for a while starting next week
[11:09] <bluca> fab, thank you very much for taking care of it
[12:48] <enr0n> bluca: slyon: thanks, I've caught up on the scrollback now
[14:40] <bluca> laney, slyon, enr0n: just an unofficial and backchannel-y heads-up: the 18.04 resolved issue is becoming a bit more than "hot" in the A cloud, it's burning through the floors
[14:56] <schopin> Anyone here knowledgeable in nodejs? I'm a bit puzzled by a test that runs in 5s on the Debian CI arm64 runners, and 40s on ours :/
[14:56] <schopin> (on a JS package)
[15:27] <slyon> bluca: ACK. the security team is hard at work and rolled out updates as we speak
[15:30] <bluca> good to know, thanks