=== leftyfb_ is now known as leftyfb [01:50] arraybolt3[m]: that's what we call a "regular" troll https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/SZtfvZmkPt/ [01:51] leftyfb: oh nice! [01:51] I liked the 2.5 hours of patience [01:51] Ah, so just call ops when I see that particular line? [01:52] I used to run a bot on EFnet that had all sorts of common text to immediately kick/ban on [01:56] leftyfb: That sounds really helpful. [03:34] good morning [06:27] why canonical is pushing on snap? [06:30] money. eventually they'll surely monetize the snap store, once everyones used to using it after being force dfor a decade or something [06:31] and also probably they were listening to records backwards [06:38] enigma9o7: I don't know of anything that would suggest anything about "monetizing" stuff is true. [06:39] From what I see, Snap has several very good advantages in the realms of security, modularity, and ease-of-use for developers, at a cost of speed, size, and feature compatibility in some instances. [06:40] The most recent "push" of Snap, the transition of Firefox from an apt package to a Snap package, was Mozilla's doing AFAIK. [06:40] Which may have been a bit premature on the part of Mozilla, but I get why they did it (sandboxing a browser is a good idea to avoid catastrophic damage in the event of a browser compromise). [06:42] Also Snap acts as the heart of Ubuntu Core, which is a different OS than Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Server - it uses only Snaps. [06:57] To me the best thing about having Mozilla build the snaps is that security-related fixes get out to all the supported releases immediately, instead of a chain of Mozilla fixes>Ubuntu integrates fix in each supported release [06:59] rfm: 👍️ [06:59] just a bit harder to fix bugs this way if the user has to go upstream === mmebsd is now known as linsux === coconut_ is now known as coconut === crap is now known as Guest1750