[01:30] <augustin> Hey
[01:31] <arraybolt3[m]> augustin: 👋
[01:40] <ylwghst> Hey, I'm aware of two bug in the kinetic daily build.
[01:41] <ylwghst> 1. gnome-shell crash when you try open file with gnome-text-editor from nautilus context menu.
[01:43] <ylwghst> What can I do to help debug?
[01:43] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: Just knowing that the bugs are there and how to reproduce them will help immensely with resolving them.
[01:44] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: As for debugging, that depends entirely on the nature of the bug itself :)
[01:44] <arraybolt3[m]> Maybe it's a coding error, in which case identifying the bad code is the solution. Or maybe a config file is messed up, or...
[01:45] <ylwghst> This first #1 is kinda critical it completely crashes back to GDm. Ig there should be logs to get using journactl rigt?
[01:45] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: Yeah, there probably are. What you probably want to do is run "ubuntu-bug nautilus" in a terminal, that should help you get started bug reporting.
[01:46] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: You'll have to make an account on Launchpad (really Ubuntu One, the single sign-on system). The command will upload critical debugging files to Launchpad, and ask you to make a bug report.
[01:46] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: Then describe in detail the steps to reproduce the issue, the expected result, the actual result, and the hardware that you are able to reproduce the issue on.
[01:53] <ylwghst> Can someone try to reproduce?
[01:53] <ylwghst> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1988234
[02:45] <ylwghst> The second bug is that opening Settings at Appearance resets every time dark mode to light mode (gtk legacy theme).
[02:46] <ylwghst> Anyone experienced this?
[02:47] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: I think I've seen something similar, but maybe not. You might try asking in #ubuntu-next (though it doesn't get a whole lot of activity).
[02:47] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: Also, nice job on that first bug report, that looks great.
[03:02] <ylwghst> I probably know why this happen.
[03:03] <ylwghst> is the ubuntu control center being patched?
[03:03] <ylwghst> to enable the accent funcionality?
[03:03] <ylwghst> where fix can be provided?
[03:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> ylwghst: Thanks for providing that bug report, but devs are volunteers and can't work 24/7. You'll have to have patience. Doing the bug report is the right thing, but posting in here won't get it fixed any faster.
[03:12] <Eickmeyer[m]> Support help is in #ubuntu, not here.
[03:12] <arraybolt3[m]> ylwghst: (Also note that #ubuntu-next is the channel for support of the development release of Ubuntu, that's probably where you want to be.)
[04:54] <ylwghst> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1988246
[09:00] <ginggs> didrocks: hi! did you see gregoa's question in LP: #1980662 ?  i was going to ask the same, but he beat me to it
[09:02] <didrocks> ginggs: hum, seems that my answer was not clear enough as I mentioned those tests
[09:08] <ginggs> didrocks: my understanding is the autodep8-perl-recommends test does a full build (including build tests) before running the autopkgtest bit
[09:09] <ginggs> if you scroll up a bit in the autopkgtest logs, you can see the same tests that are run during the build
[09:12] <didrocks> ginggs: ah, you‘re right, as I was scrolling down too much (after the second package install), I only saw the syntax checkers, not the package build + test build itself
[09:12] <didrocks> ok, answering on the bug then, thanks ginggs!
[09:14] <ginggs> didrocks: thanks
[09:15] <ginggs> i think it's actually autodep8-perl-build-deps that does the build test, not autodep8-perl-recommends as i wrote above
[09:16] <didrocks> yeah, it looks like it
[09:17] <didrocks> it’s nice to have this package rebuild tests automatically for nothing
[09:19] <ginggs> yeah, Debian Perl Group have some nice tooling
[10:47] <mitya57> vorlon: Hi! rs2009 asked me if I can be an official uploader for Ubuntu Unity flavor. I already upload unity, compiz and indicator-* packages quite frequently, so I agreed.
[11:03] <rs2009> hey mitya57 :) ty for your help and support
[11:03] <rs2009> would be great if you could also send your statement to the Technical Board mailing list at technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
[11:28] <mitya57> Done
[15:40] <teward> mitya57: ping
[15:41] <mitya57> Hi
[15:41] <teward> mitya57: remind me your upload privs?  MOTU?  Core Dev?  I ask only because I can't access it easy here (still rebuilding all my links and util scripts)
[15:41] <mitya57> Core Dev
[18:30] <nicolasbock> Hi! After the latest update yesterday my gdm3 / gnome / wayland session is not starting anymore
[18:30] <nicolasbock> Not sure if this here is the right place to discuss this, please feel free to redirect me in case it's not :)
[18:36] <vorlon> nicolasbock: #ubuntu+1 if you're on the devel series, otherwise #ubuntu
[18:37] <nicolasbock> This is on kientic
[19:47] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: FYI upgrades from Groovy and Impish to Jammy are now supported so I don't think your response in bug 1988109 is correct
[19:48] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I was under the impression that the groovy repo had been moved to old-releases.
[19:49] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: sure but it shouldn't matter
[19:50] <Eickmeyer> OK, then I'll retract my comment and set to New. :)
[19:51] <Eickmeyer> Though, it seems kind of odd that they installed groovy *that day*.
[19:51] <bdmurray> That's not what I see InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-24 (523 days ago)
[19:52] <Eickmeyer> Oh, I was looking at the installation media, and "Upgraded to groovy 0 days ago".
[19:52]  * Eickmeyer 's brain is all over the place today
[19:52] <bdmurray> You were caught by bug 1315559 then
[19:53] <Eickmeyer> Ha! Looks familiar.