[15:00] <slyon> o/
[15:01] <ginggs> o/
[15:01] <dbungert> o/
[15:01] <jawn-smith> o/
[15:01] <sil2100> o/
[15:01] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:01] <schopin> o/
[15:01] <meetingology> Meeting started at 15:01:58 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[15:02] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[15:02] <jawn-smith> The weekly status is here:
[15:02] <jawn-smith> #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-1st-september-2022/30351/
[15:02] <jawn-smith> Let's take our usual time to read and ask questions
[15:04] <jawn-smith> sil2100: how is 20.04.5 coming along?
[15:04] <sil2100> jawn-smith: released! Waiting for mirrors to pick up, but we're basically out
[15:04] <ginggs> \o/
[15:04] <jawn-smith> cool I should seed it
[15:05] <vorlon> slyon: I'm running networkmanager from the ppa now and forcibly updated the config of my default connection, nothing has exploded yet
[15:06] <slyon> vorlon: nice! :)
[15:06] <jawn-smith> Meant to thank waveform for testing my new pi images
[15:06] <vorlon> I am wondering about some repetition in the netplan yaml
[15:06] <jawn-smith> So thanks waveform
[15:06] <slyon> vorlon: yes, some settings use "passthrough" and might contain repetition
[15:07] <vorlon> slyon: the thing that surprises me is repetition of the uuid and name at both the device level and the access-point level
[15:08] <slyon> vorlon: ahh yes. I can't remember what exactly, but there was _some_ reason this was required in the current NM implementation
[15:09] <vorlon> I will have to roam with the laptop and see if autoconnection works correctly across different networks
[15:10] <jawn-smith> Any other questions?
[15:10] <bdmurray> That sounds like a good way to get out of the office
[15:11] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[15:11] <jawn-smith>  #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:11] <jawn-smith> bug 1987679
[15:12] <jawn-smith> juliank: you tagged this
[15:12] <jawn-smith> also dbungert I think you've worked on os-prober a bit
[15:12] <jawn-smith> What do you both think of carding this?
[15:12] <juliank> more stuff happened since then, hmm
[15:13] <juliank> anyhow this needs fixing
[15:13] <dbungert> I think it's worth investigation.  We saw stuff like this but with different symptoms and it might cause an installer to underreport the OSes present.
[15:13] <jawn-smith> Okay let's go ahead and card it then
[15:13] <jawn-smith> Any volunteers to card this one?
[15:14] <slyon> o/
[15:14] <jawn-smith> Thanks!
[15:14] <slyon> I can do the carding
[15:14] <jawn-smith> bug 1097467
[15:14] <jawn-smith> That's an old one
[15:15] <jawn-smith> Seems like a doko question
[15:16] <jawn-smith> doko is out for the next couple of weeks. Should we card this for you to look at when you're back? Or defer the carding discussion until then?
[15:16] <jawn-smith> Seeing as how this bug is 9 years old it's probably not terribly urgent
[15:16] <bdmurray> I would defer carding
[15:16] <jawn-smith> Okay, carding deferred
[15:17] <dbungert> Frank has been tagging things like LP: #1988407, but they don't show in the report.  I'm content to triage and ensure they get worked on, should we enhance the report?
[15:18] <dbungert> I will card that
[15:18] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:18] <jawn-smith> bug 1986648
[15:18] <jawn-smith> Seems like a no brainer to card
[15:19] <jawn-smith> oh it looks like there already is a card
[15:19] <jawn-smith> 2629
[15:19] <bdmurray> And somebody already did that
[15:19] <bdmurray> so I'll just remove the tag
[15:19] <jawn-smith> Thanks!
[15:19] <jawn-smith> That's the only jj, and ff is empty
[15:20] <jawn-smith> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:20] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:20] <jawn-smith> vorlon:
[15:20] <vorlon> pretty short list
[15:20] <vorlon> python-secretstorage: juliank were you still looking at this?
[15:20] <vorlon> I didn't see any mention of it in weekly report
[15:20] <juliank> I did not get around to looking at excuses
[15:21] <vorlon> juliank: will you this week?
[15:21] <juliank> I'll try
[15:21] <vorlon> if you can't commit, we can give it to someone else
[15:21] <vorlon> there are only 6 of these to assign out :)
[15:22] <slyon> a netplan vs OVS fix is pending in the latest netplan upload. but Blocked by the pandoc/armhf build (which failed, timeout)
[15:22] <vorlon> let's give python-secretstorage to jawn-smith
[15:22] <jawn-smith> ack o/
[15:22] <vorlon> slyon: ok; will probably rollback pandoc to get netplan.io built, then re-publish it and continue fighting with ghc/armhf
[15:22] <slyon> vorlon: ok. thanks
[15:24] <vorlon> gobject-introspection depends on glib2.0, this is desktop team I believe
[15:24] <vorlon> u-boot missing builds: waveform are you working on this?
[15:24] <waveform> yup
[15:24] <vorlon> u-boot: waveform
[15:25] <vorlon> waveform: (are you going to try the easy way or the hard way? :)
[15:25] <vorlon> bash: doko do you have time to follow through on this?
[15:25] <waveform> vorlon, next step is to try the (presumably?) easy way of just forcing it to use gcc-10
[15:26] <vorlon> waveform: there's no installable gcc-10 mipsel cross either
[15:26] <doko> vorlon: no, don't want to commit
[15:26] <vorlon> can someone else take care of the bash autopkgtest regressions?
[15:27] <enr0n> vorlon: I can take a look
[15:27] <vorlon> enr0n: thanks
[15:27] <vorlon> bash: enr0n
[15:28] <vorlon> and boost1.74; one autopkgtest regression, someone want to look at this?
[15:28] <vorlon> (it was LocutusOfBorg's upload, so we could also leave it to him)
[15:29]  * waveform will nuke the mipsen bits in our u-boot
[15:29] <dbungert> I can take a look at boost
[15:30] <slyon> wrt. lintian MIR: If any AA feels like, libfreezethaw-perl & libhtml-tokeparser-simple-perl would be ready for promotion (LP: #1980662)
[15:30] <vorlon> boost1.74: dbungert
[15:30] <dbungert> ack
[15:30] <vorlon> and that's all
[15:30] <vorlon> jawn-smith:
[15:30] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[15:30] <slyon> I'll be out for a lengthy vacation. see email
[15:31] <vorlon> slyon: I was going to wait on promoting those until all the lintian MIRs were done
[15:31] <vorlon> otherwise they just show up for demotion on a different report
[15:31] <slyon> vorlon: ack
[15:31] <bdmurray> Monday is a US holiday
[15:31] <doko> I'll be away for two weels as well
[15:31] <doko> weeks even
[15:31] <jawn-smith> Oh right, forgot about the 3 day weekend
[15:32] <sil2100> slyon: have fun!
[15:32] <slyon> thanks! :)
[15:32] <sil2100> doko: same o/
[15:34] <jawn-smith> Anything else?
[15:34] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[15:34] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:34:54 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-09-01-15.01.moin.txt
[15:34] <vorlon> thanks, all!