/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/09/01/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phosh [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-2] (no packageset)00:03
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.182~22.04.1]00:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phosh [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-2] (no packageset)00:59
jbichavorlon: libgovirt currently only builds on some arches 🤷01:02
jbichathere's a second blocker bug if you want to let it into kinetic anyway01:04
jbichaI'm working on fixing gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect so no need to remove it fully from kinetic yet01:07
jbicha(but I'm ok either way with libgovirt)01:07
vorlonjbicha: well, built on some arches is not a regression vs built on no arches02:22
vorlonwhich is, after all, the consequence of it having been removed from the release pocket02:22
rs2009vorlon and tsimonq2: I actually get the same build error locally, just with archive.ubuntu.com instead of ftpmaster.internal, and looks the contents of /etc/resolv.conf are empty after running 'apt install' the first time06:27
rs2009s/looks/looks like/g06:27
rs2009hey sil210007:07
rs2009hey sil2100, thanks for your vote :) also, was wondering if it would be possible to update https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live (made some changes in https://code.launchpad.net/~unity7maintainers/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-unity just now)07:32
rs2009^ sil2100 and vorlon07:33
acibasil2100: if you have SRU vanguard review time, cloud-init has an unapproved upload 22.3-13 from SRU to Bionic, Focal and Jammy. We've sync'd changes for two bug fixes found and fixed before our previous 22.3.-3 SRU unapproved upload was accepted https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318, thanks!07:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1987318 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress]07:40
sil2100rs2009: I'm a bit occupied with 20.04.5, but I should have more time next week if anything :)07:45
sil2100aciba: hey! Sure o/07:45
rs2009also, it looks like lb's using syslinux as the bootloader if BINARYFORMAT=iso, and that seems to result in this error: "E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/ubuntu-oneiric - no such directory."07:46
rs2009ah sil2100, completely forgot about 20.04.5 :facepalm: I'll start working on it too now07:47
sil2100Wimpy: hey hey Martin! I still see no test results for Ubuntu Mate for .5, are there some Mate people around to do some iso-testing? Thanks! :)07:48
rs2009I've started our 20.04.5 ISO build07:48
sil2100\o/07:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [10.4.0-4ubuntu1~22.04]08:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [18ubuntu1.1]08:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [19ubuntu1.1]08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04]08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11ubuntu1.1]08:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [8ubuntu1.1]08:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04]08:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5ubuntu2.2]08:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1.1]08:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04]08:48
schopinWould it be reasonable to hint rust-object/s390x through? It fails not because of a regression but because new tests uncovered an old bug, and it's not fixable without breaking API (see LP: #1988385)08:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988385 in rust-object (Ubuntu) "rust-object: endianness issue in s390x" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198838508:51
sil2100Hello everyone! I'd appreciate some help in testing .5 images - we're still missing test results for Xubuntu and Ubuntu Mate flavors, can someone take a look at those?09:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready09:13
rbasaksil2100: o/ I can spare some time today to work on more SRUs if that's not going to step on your toes? As there's quite a backlog.09:52
tumbleweedschopin: that sounds reasonable to me. I'll hint it.09:56
stgraberwhat's going on with langpacks on focal ppc64el? https://jenkins.linuxcontainers.org/job/image-ubuntu/architecture=ppc64el,release=focal,variant=default/2126/console10:51
stgraberdid we miss a package in a SRU release or something?10:51
rs2009tested Ubuntu Unity 20.04.5, and releasing it now11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-mysql2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.5.3-3ubuntu4.22.04.1]11:11
jbichars2009: I think that ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live page gets updated automatically11:21
rs2009jbicha: yep, looks like it got updated automatically11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready11:43
sil2100rbasak: that's fine, I'll just get back to it after .511:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
sil2100Marking server as ready since all is green12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ovn [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.03.1-0ubuntu2]12:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5]12:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sudo [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1]12:20
sil2100rbasak: in-between stuff I'll review cloud-init12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready12:26
rbasakack12:28
rbasakvorlon, juliank: I just noticed that Focal and Bionic unapproved also have a hidden source for grub2-unsigned. I don't know if that was the case before or not.12:30
rbasakHowever I probably won't end up reviewing these anyway12:30
julianknothing has changed there12:31
=== leosilva1 is now known as leosilva
halveshello ubuntu-release! could I kindly ask for a coredev to review LP: #1986611 for K, when you have some time?12:32
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1986611 in sosreport (Ubuntu Jammy) "[sru] sos upstream 4.4" [Medium, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198661112:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.14-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.18-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)12:34
rs2009thank you vorlon, sil2100 and rbasak for voting on our proposal :)12:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready13:01
sil2100Okay, marking Kubuntu as good as well, since I see all tests are passed13:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready13:02
sil2100Anyway, since I see sufficient testing for all, I'll now start the release o/13:06
sil2100THanks everyone for the swift testing!13:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.4 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist)13:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-json-jwt [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.13.0-1ubuntu0.1]13:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boxbackup [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1ubuntu2.20.04.1]13:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lighttpd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.66-1ubuntu1]13:48
mparilloWill you be able to post the URL of the release announcement?13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.17 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.18] (core, i386-whitelist)13:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] has been disabled14:00
sil2100Okay, time for the reelease14:00
sil2100mparillo: sure, but I usually send that thing last. I'll send it here once it's done o/14:01
mparilloTY.14:02
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, pandoc restore please?14:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10-cross-ports (jammy-proposed/universe) [19ubuntu1.1 => 19ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)14:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [19ubuntu1.1]14:40
sil2100We are now released!14:54
sil2100(well, mirrors still syncing)14:54
sil2100waveform: hey! Can you update the raspi installer JSON for .5?14:55
sil2100bdmurray: can you take care of updating the meta-release files?14:55
waveformsil2100, on it14:55
bdmurraysil2100: I'll do it after waveform's MP14:56
sil2100\o/14:56
sil2100Thanks!14:56
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: what do you mean by restore?15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross to i386-whitelist in jammy15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross-ports to i386-whitelist in jammy15:01
vorlonrs2009: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live gets updated automatically every 5 minutes15:02
rs2009vorlon: oh noice15:02
vorlonxnox: have you seen my request for a sourceful upload of linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency to drop the obsolete binaries from -proposed?15:20
icey[m]hey sil2100 : wanted to circle back around on what next steps are for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1967139 ?15:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1967139 in python-cheroot (Ubuntu Jammy) "unable to enable ceph-mgr dashboard module" [High, Fix Committed]15:21
sil2100icey[m]: hey! One moment, let me look15:22
icey[m]sil2100: thanks! NO super rush but it would be nice to get it done :)15:30
sil2100aciba: hey! Quick question about the debian/*.postinst of "fix_1978422_redact_sensitive_logs_on_invalid_userdata_schema()"15:30
sil2100aciba: could you give me an overview what is the purpose of this postinst? Is it to basically remove sensitive info from existing logs?15:31
sil2100(in the cloud-init SRU)15:33
falcojrsil2100: (aciba is at end of day), yes, it is to remove sensitive info from the logs. It is part of a hotfix that has already been released15:35
vorlonxnox: incidentally, if I just remove the binaries from -proposed, they'll grow back when britney copies the package to the release pocket :P15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (jammy-proposed/main) [17.2.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 17.2.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (ubuntu-server)15:37
waveformbdmurray, think I've managed to propose the rpi-imager changes to the right place; https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/meta-release/ubuntu/+merge/42930615:37
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: I have removed pandoc from -proposed, it's blocking netplan.io so I'll copy it back again once netplan.io has a change to build.  Any other packages that were dep-wait?15:37
bdmurraywaveform: that looks correct to me, thanks!15:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.13-2ubuntu0.5 => 2.0.29-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)15:50
vorlonginggs, schopin: wrt busco being arch: all, we don't require arch: all packages to actually be installable across archs for migration16:27
vorlonI believe in the current configuration we check for installability only an amd6416:28
ginggsi think debian are now checking on amd64 and arm64, previously it was amd64 and i38616:31
vorlonyeah, I don't see us switching to check on arm64; it would cost us a lot of time picking apart the uninstallables and there's no reason for us to preference arm64 over ppc64el and s390x (and contractual reasons not to ;)16:32
vorlonslyon, LocutusOfBorg: netplan.io built successfully on armhf, and pandoc copied back to -proposed16:34
vorlonI can always rip it out again if we need to16:34
slyonvorlon: yay! Thanks a lot16:44
vorlonhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.38-1/+build/23849534 <table flip>17:07
vorlonand did not happen in Debian17:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isa-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [13] (no packageset)17:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isa-support [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [13] (no packageset)17:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isa-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [13]18:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isa-support [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [13]18:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2]18:08
teward[m]any not-busy SRU members able to get something past unapproved and into -proposed for testing of the SRU?  universe, torbrowser-launcher has been broken since Jammy, Kinetic has a fix in it, just needs the Jammy SRU to go through.18:09
teward[m]https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/1963286 if you'd be so kind :)18:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1963286 in torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] torbrowser-launcher crashed with   move(self, int, int) in main(): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float'" [Medium, Confirmed]18:10
teward[m](this affects me which is the only reason I'm poking)18:10
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.04.1 Jammy Jellyfish, 20.04.5 Focal Fossa | Archive: kinetic open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Kinetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-unity-settings (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.10-1]18:35
guiverc[m]sil2100: focal.5 ML ETA?18:38
sil2100guiverc[m]: sent it out, but needs moderation!18:39
guiverc[m]ack & thanks18:39
bdmurraywill moderate18:43
guiverc[m]thanks bdmurray18:49
sil2100Thank you!19:04
sil2100https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2022-September/000283.html19:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]19:13
kanashiro[m]if anyone from the release team could take a look at this FFe bug would be appreciated: LP #198847419:28
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988474 in ruby-daemons (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sycn version 1.4.1-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198847419:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]19:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]20:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]20:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]20:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.3-6ubuntu1.22.04.1]20:49
kanashiro[m]ubuntu-archive: a removal request (also submitted to Debian) to unblock ruby-rack migration: LP #198847820:52
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1988478 in ruby-rack-mount (Ubuntu) "[RM] Abandoned upstream and blocking ruby-rack migration" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198847820:52
bdmurrayvorlon: Could you fully phased casper for focal given it was on the install media?21:21
vorlonbdmurray: done21:30
tewardfor whoever accepted torbrowser-launcher into jammy-proposed, thank you kindly!21:48
=== handsome_feng_ is now known as handsome_feng
=== mapreri_ is now known as mapreri
=== madhens_ is now known as madhens
=== Wimpy_ is now known as Wimpy
=== haggertk_ is now known as haggertk
=== Guest8328 is now known as krytarik
=== bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray
bdmurrayvorlon: Can I get a +1 on an early release of tzdata?22:57
bdmurrayor RAOF ^23:05
rbasakbdmurray: +1 in principle, if verification looks good23:07
rbasakBut can't you issue a +1 yourself? :)23:08
bdmurrayGiven that it's less than 7 days I thought having a second approval would be good.23:08
rbasakSure23:09
rbasakI had thought that we'd agreed an early release could be approved by any SRU team member on pretty weak grounds.23:09
rbasaktzdata seems like an obvious candidate to me; hence my +123:09
bdmurrayOkay, if that's what we'd agreed on!23:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!