-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phosh [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-2] (no packageset) | 00:03 | |
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.182~22.04.1] | 00:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phosh [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.20.0-2] (no packageset) | 00:59 | |
jbicha | vorlon: libgovirt currently only builds on some arches 🤷 | 01:02 |
---|---|---|
jbicha | there's a second blocker bug if you want to let it into kinetic anyway | 01:04 |
jbicha | I'm working on fixing gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect so no need to remove it fully from kinetic yet | 01:07 |
jbicha | (but I'm ok either way with libgovirt) | 01:07 |
vorlon | jbicha: well, built on some arches is not a regression vs built on no arches | 02:22 |
vorlon | which is, after all, the consequence of it having been removed from the release pocket | 02:22 |
rs2009 | vorlon and tsimonq2: I actually get the same build error locally, just with archive.ubuntu.com instead of ftpmaster.internal, and looks the contents of /etc/resolv.conf are empty after running 'apt install' the first time | 06:27 |
rs2009 | s/looks/looks like/g | 06:27 |
rs2009 | hey sil2100 | 07:07 |
rs2009 | hey sil2100, thanks for your vote :) also, was wondering if it would be possible to update https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live (made some changes in https://code.launchpad.net/~unity7maintainers/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-unity just now) | 07:32 |
rs2009 | ^ sil2100 and vorlon | 07:33 |
aciba | sil2100: if you have SRU vanguard review time, cloud-init has an unapproved upload 22.3-13 from SRU to Bionic, Focal and Jammy. We've sync'd changes for two bug fixes found and fixed before our previous 22.3.-3 SRU unapproved upload was accepted https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1987318, thanks! | 07:40 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1987318 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (22.3 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, In Progress] | 07:40 |
sil2100 | rs2009: I'm a bit occupied with 20.04.5, but I should have more time next week if anything :) | 07:45 |
sil2100 | aciba: hey! Sure o/ | 07:45 |
rs2009 | also, it looks like lb's using syslinux as the bootloader if BINARYFORMAT=iso, and that seems to result in this error: "E: /usr/share/syslinux/themes/ubuntu-oneiric - no such directory." | 07:46 |
rs2009 | ah sil2100, completely forgot about 20.04.5 :facepalm: I'll start working on it too now | 07:47 |
sil2100 | Wimpy: hey hey Martin! I still see no test results for Ubuntu Mate for .5, are there some Mate people around to do some iso-testing? Thanks! :) | 07:48 |
rs2009 | I've started our 20.04.5 ISO build | 07:48 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 07:51 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [10.4.0-4ubuntu1~22.04] | 08:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [18ubuntu1.1] | 08:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [19ubuntu1.1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04] | 08:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [11ubuntu1.1] | 08:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [8ubuntu1.1] | 08:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04] | 08:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (jammy-proposed) [5ubuntu2.2] | 08:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1ubuntu1.1] | 08:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [sync] (jammy-proposed) [12.1-0ubuntu1~22.04] | 08:48 | |
schopin | Would it be reasonable to hint rust-object/s390x through? It fails not because of a regression but because new tests uncovered an old bug, and it's not fixable without breaking API (see LP: #1988385) | 08:51 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1988385 in rust-object (Ubuntu) "rust-object: endianness issue in s390x" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988385 | 08:51 |
sil2100 | Hello everyone! I'd appreciate some help in testing .5 images - we're still missing test results for Xubuntu and Ubuntu Mate flavors, can someone take a look at those? | 09:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 09:13 | |
rbasak | sil2100: o/ I can spare some time today to work on more SRUs if that's not going to step on your toes? As there's quite a backlog. | 09:52 |
tumbleweed | schopin: that sounds reasonable to me. I'll hint it. | 09:56 |
stgraber | what's going on with langpacks on focal ppc64el? https://jenkins.linuxcontainers.org/job/image-ubuntu/architecture=ppc64el,release=focal,variant=default/2126/console | 10:51 |
stgraber | did we miss a package in a SRU release or something? | 10:51 |
rs2009 | tested Ubuntu Unity 20.04.5, and releasing it now | 11:09 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-mysql2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.5.3-3ubuntu4.22.04.1] | 11:11 | |
jbicha | rs2009: I think that ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live page gets updated automatically | 11:21 |
rs2009 | jbicha: yep, looks like it got updated automatically | 11:22 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 11:43 | |
sil2100 | rbasak: that's fine, I'll just get back to it after .5 | 11:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
sil2100 | Marking server as ready since all is green | 12:06 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ovn [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.03.1-0ubuntu2] | 12:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (jammy-proposed) [20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5] | 12:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sudo [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1] | 12:20 | |
sil2100 | rbasak: in-between stuff I'll review cloud-init | 12:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 12:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 12:26 | |
rbasak | ack | 12:28 |
rbasak | vorlon, juliank: I just noticed that Focal and Bionic unapproved also have a hidden source for grub2-unsigned. I don't know if that was the case before or not. | 12:30 |
rbasak | However I probably won't end up reviewing these anyway | 12:30 |
juliank | nothing has changed there | 12:31 |
=== leosilva1 is now known as leosilva | ||
halves | hello ubuntu-release! could I kindly ask for a coredev to review LP: #1986611 for K, when you have some time? | 12:32 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1986611 in sosreport (Ubuntu Jammy) "[sru] sos upstream 4.4" [Medium, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1986611 | 12:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.14-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.18-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 12:34 | |
rs2009 | thank you vorlon, sil2100 and rbasak for voting on our proposal :) | 12:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 13:01 | |
sil2100 | Okay, marking Kubuntu as good as well, since I see all tests are passed | 13:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 13:02 | |
sil2100 | Anyway, since I see sufficient testing for all, I'll now start the release o/ | 13:06 |
sil2100 | THanks everyone for the swift testing! | 13:07 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 13:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 13:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 13:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.4 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-json-jwt [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.13.0-1ubuntu0.1] | 13:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted boxbackup [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1ubuntu2.20.04.1] | 13:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lighttpd [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.66-1ubuntu1] | 13:48 | |
mparillo | Will you be able to post the URL of the release announcement? | 13:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.17 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.18] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.5] has been marked as ready | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] has been disabled | 14:00 | |
sil2100 | Okay, time for the reelease | 14:00 |
sil2100 | mparillo: sure, but I usually send that thing last. I'll send it here once it's done o/ | 14:01 |
mparillo | TY. | 14:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, pandoc restore please? | 14:21 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10-cross-ports (jammy-proposed/universe) [19ubuntu1.1 => 19ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 14:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10-cross-ports [sync] (jammy-proposed) [19ubuntu1.1] | 14:40 | |
sil2100 | We are now released! | 14:54 |
sil2100 | (well, mirrors still syncing) | 14:54 |
sil2100 | waveform: hey! Can you update the raspi installer JSON for .5? | 14:55 |
sil2100 | bdmurray: can you take care of updating the meta-release files? | 14:55 |
waveform | sil2100, on it | 14:55 |
bdmurray | sil2100: I'll do it after waveform's MP | 14:56 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 14:56 |
sil2100 | Thanks! | 14:56 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: what do you mean by restore? | 15:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross to i386-whitelist in jammy | 15:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-10-cross-ports to i386-whitelist in jammy | 15:01 | |
vorlon | rs2009: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu-unity.kinetic/live gets updated automatically every 5 minutes | 15:02 |
rs2009 | vorlon: oh noice | 15:02 |
vorlon | xnox: have you seen my request for a sourceful upload of linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency to drop the obsolete binaries from -proposed? | 15:20 |
icey[m] | hey sil2100 : wanted to circle back around on what next steps are for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1967139 ? | 15:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1967139 in python-cheroot (Ubuntu Jammy) "unable to enable ceph-mgr dashboard module" [High, Fix Committed] | 15:21 |
sil2100 | icey[m]: hey! One moment, let me look | 15:22 |
icey[m] | sil2100: thanks! NO super rush but it would be nice to get it done :) | 15:30 |
sil2100 | aciba: hey! Quick question about the debian/*.postinst of "fix_1978422_redact_sensitive_logs_on_invalid_userdata_schema()" | 15:30 |
sil2100 | aciba: could you give me an overview what is the purpose of this postinst? Is it to basically remove sensitive info from existing logs? | 15:31 |
sil2100 | (in the cloud-init SRU) | 15:33 |
falcojr | sil2100: (aciba is at end of day), yes, it is to remove sensitive info from the logs. It is part of a hotfix that has already been released | 15:35 |
vorlon | xnox: incidentally, if I just remove the binaries from -proposed, they'll grow back when britney copies the package to the release pocket :P | 15:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (jammy-proposed/main) [17.2.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 17.2.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (ubuntu-server) | 15:37 | |
waveform | bdmurray, think I've managed to propose the rpi-imager changes to the right place; https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/meta-release/ubuntu/+merge/429306 | 15:37 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: I have removed pandoc from -proposed, it's blocking netplan.io so I'll copy it back again once netplan.io has a change to build. Any other packages that were dep-wait? | 15:37 |
bdmurray | waveform: that looks correct to me, thanks! | 15:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.13-2ubuntu0.5 => 2.0.29-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 15:50 | |
vorlon | ginggs, schopin: wrt busco being arch: all, we don't require arch: all packages to actually be installable across archs for migration | 16:27 |
vorlon | I believe in the current configuration we check for installability only an amd64 | 16:28 |
ginggs | i think debian are now checking on amd64 and arm64, previously it was amd64 and i386 | 16:31 |
vorlon | yeah, I don't see us switching to check on arm64; it would cost us a lot of time picking apart the uninstallables and there's no reason for us to preference arm64 over ppc64el and s390x (and contractual reasons not to ;) | 16:32 |
vorlon | slyon, LocutusOfBorg: netplan.io built successfully on armhf, and pandoc copied back to -proposed | 16:34 |
vorlon | I can always rip it out again if we need to | 16:34 |
slyon | vorlon: yay! Thanks a lot | 16:44 |
vorlon | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.38-1/+build/23849534 <table flip> | 17:07 |
vorlon | and did not happen in Debian | 17:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isa-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [13] (no packageset) | 17:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: isa-support [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [13] (no packageset) | 17:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isa-support [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [13] | 18:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted isa-support [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [13] | 18:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2] | 18:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2] | 18:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2] | 18:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2] | 18:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phosh [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.20.0-2] | 18:08 | |
teward[m] | any not-busy SRU members able to get something past unapproved and into -proposed for testing of the SRU? universe, torbrowser-launcher has been broken since Jammy, Kinetic has a fix in it, just needs the Jammy SRU to go through. | 18:09 |
teward[m] | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/1963286 if you'd be so kind :) | 18:10 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1963286 in torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] torbrowser-launcher crashed with move(self, int, int) in main(): argument 1 has unexpected type 'float'" [Medium, Confirmed] | 18:10 |
teward[m] | (this affects me which is the only reason I'm poking) | 18:10 |
=== sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.04.1 Jammy Jellyfish, 20.04.5 Focal Fossa | Archive: kinetic open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Kinetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-unity-settings (kinetic-proposed/primary) [22.10-1] | 18:35 | |
guiverc[m] | sil2100: focal.5 ML ETA? | 18:38 |
sil2100 | guiverc[m]: sent it out, but needs moderation! | 18:39 |
guiverc[m] | ack & thanks | 18:39 |
bdmurray | will moderate | 18:43 |
guiverc[m] | thanks bdmurray | 18:49 |
sil2100 | Thank you! | 19:04 |
sil2100 | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2022-September/000283.html | 19:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] | 19:13 | |
kanashiro[m] | if anyone from the release team could take a look at this FFe bug would be appreciated: LP #1988474 | 19:28 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1988474 in ruby-daemons (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sycn version 1.4.1-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988474 | 19:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 19:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 20:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-3-g9f0efc47-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 20:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [22.3-13-g70ce6442-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 20:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.3.3-6ubuntu1.22.04.1] | 20:49 | |
kanashiro[m] | ubuntu-archive: a removal request (also submitted to Debian) to unblock ruby-rack migration: LP #1988478 | 20:52 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1988478 in ruby-rack-mount (Ubuntu) "[RM] Abandoned upstream and blocking ruby-rack migration" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988478 | 20:52 |
bdmurray | vorlon: Could you fully phased casper for focal given it was on the install media? | 21:21 |
vorlon | bdmurray: done | 21:30 |
teward | for whoever accepted torbrowser-launcher into jammy-proposed, thank you kindly! | 21:48 |
=== handsome_feng_ is now known as handsome_feng | ||
=== mapreri_ is now known as mapreri | ||
=== madhens_ is now known as madhens | ||
=== Wimpy_ is now known as Wimpy | ||
=== haggertk_ is now known as haggertk | ||
=== Guest8328 is now known as krytarik | ||
=== bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray | ||
bdmurray | vorlon: Can I get a +1 on an early release of tzdata? | 22:57 |
bdmurray | or RAOF ^ | 23:05 |
rbasak | bdmurray: +1 in principle, if verification looks good | 23:07 |
rbasak | But can't you issue a +1 yourself? :) | 23:08 |
bdmurray | Given that it's less than 7 days I thought having a second approval would be good. | 23:08 |
rbasak | Sure | 23:09 |
rbasak | I had thought that we'd agreed an early release could be approved by any SRU team member on pretty weak grounds. | 23:09 |
rbasak | tzdata seems like an obvious candidate to me; hence my +1 | 23:09 |
bdmurray | Okay, if that's what we'd agreed on! | 23:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!